Connect with us

Uncategorized

Niger incidents underline rising Sahel spillover threat to Nigeria’s security

Published

on

Niger incidents underline rising Sahel spillover threat to Nigeria’s security

By: Zagazola Makama

A series of deadly incidents in neighbouring Niger between Feb. 6 and Feb. 10 has again exposed the fragility of security across the central Sahel and the growing risk of spillover into Nigeria.

Zagazola report from the period show a grim pattern: an air raid that killed mostly civilians in Tillaberi Region; a mass abduction in Diffa Region near Nigeria’s border; and a roadside bomb attack that claimed at least 11 lives.

On Feb. 6, coordinated drone strikes hit a crowded market in Kokoloko, about 120 kilometres from Niamey. While the strikes were said to be aimed at terrorist elements, the outcome was devastating for civilians.

At least 17 civilians, including three minors, were killed, with only three terrorists reportedly neutralised. Several properties were destroyed in the fires that followed.

Two days later, suspected ISWAP elements invaded Gagamari Village in the Chettimari Commune of Diffa Region, just six kilometres from Gargada and close to Nigeria’s border. The attackers reportedly focused on youths, abducting about 28 males. On Feb. 9, the group released the youngest of the victims with a warning to authorities that they would return for more youths.

On Feb. 10, tragedy struck again when a commuter vehicle drove into a remotely emplaced improvised explosive device (RSBIED) lane at Baroua in Diffa. The blast killed a National Guard soldier on leave and 10 other passengers, destroying the vehicle.

These incidents reflect a broader and worrying trend: the steady southward creep of jihadist violence from the Sahel into West Africa’s coastal and near-coastal states. Niger’s security crisis is increasingly intertwined with developments in Mali and Burkina Faso under the Alliance of Sahel States (AES), whose withdrawal from ECOWAS and pivot to Russian Wagner mercenaries have reshaped regional security dynamics.

The resulting vacuum has been exploited by jihadist groups such as ISWAP and ISIS-linked elements, which are now linking operations across north-central Niger, Nigeria’s North-East and North-West, and through intermediaries in the Sahel.

The convergence is evident in recent atrocities, including the February 2026 massacre in Kwara State where JAS-linked extremists reportedly killed nearly 200 civilians, a signal that the threat is edging closer to Nigeria’s economic heartlands.

For Nigeria, reactive containment is no longer sufficient. A proactive, multi-layered strategy is required, one that combines hardened borders, pragmatic diplomacy and internal resilience.

Nigeria must accelerate border fortification with advanced surveillance, drone patrols and rapid-response units in high-risk corridors such as the Lake Chad Basin axis and the Sokoto–Kebbi route. Porous borders remain the main arteries for the flow of arms, fighters and logistics.

Abuja needs a recalibrated diplomatic posture. Bilateral intelligence-sharing pacts with AES regimes, even outside ECOWAS frameworks are essential to disrupt cross-border networks. Ongoing talks with the United States on drone logistics could provide technological leverage, but Nigeria must assert autonomy to avoid perceptions of external puppetry that fuel anti-Nigerian rhetoric in Sahelian propaganda.

Third, internal resilience is non-negotiable. Poverty, youth unemployment and governance deficits in border communities continue to feed recruitment and the spread of ransom camps from Borno to Kwara. Without visible improvements in livelihoods and local administration, security gains will remain fragile.

The Sahel now accounts for more than half of global terrorism deaths. If Nigeria does not move decisively on sealed borders, pragmatic diplomacy and socioeconomic fortification, it risks turning its northern frontiers into a permanent jihadist conduit.

The Niger incidents are not isolated tragedies. They are warnings. The window for preventive action is narrowing, and the price of delay will be paid in lives, stability and the future of regional integration in West Africa.

Zagazola Makama is a Counter Insurgency Expert and Security Analyst in the Lake Chad Region

Niger incidents underline rising Sahel spillover threat to Nigeria’s security

Continue Reading
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Uncategorized

Kogi police neutralize armed robber in Lokoja community

Published

on

Kogi police neutralize armed robber in Lokoja community

By: Zagazola Makama

The Kogi State Police Command has neutralized an armed robber during a shootout in Indori Community, Lokoja, the police reported.

Sources said that the incident occurred at about 4:30 a.m. on Feb. 8 when about 20 armed robbers engaged security forces in a dual exchange of fire. One of the robbers, a middle-aged man yet to be identified, was hit in the chest and rushed to the Federal Teaching Hospital, Lokoja, where he was confirmed dead. The corpse was deposited at the hospital mortuary.

Recovered at the scene were a navy blue school bag containing multiple mobile phones, seven power banks, an earpod, a silver wristwatch, a cutlass, two kitchen knives, slippers, a black fez cap, and a black polo. Security operatives also retrieved seven empty AK-47 cartridges, five empty cartridges, and four spent teargas shells.

The police confirmed that photographs of the scene were taken and investigations, intelligence gathering, and surveillance are ongoing to arrest the fleeing perpetrators.

Kogi police neutralize armed robber in Lokoja community

Continue Reading

Uncategorized

NIS Dismisses Claims of Regional Exclusion in Passport Issuance

Published

on

NIS Dismisses Claims of Regional Exclusion in Passport Issuance

By: Michael Mike

The Nigeria Immigration Service (NIS) has debunked reports circulating online alleging that a particular region of the country has been barred from obtaining Nigerian passports, describing the claim as false and misleading.

In a statement issued on Saturday, the Service said the reports wrongly interpreted ongoing reforms aimed at modernising the country’s passport administration system.

According to NIS, no region or group of Nigerians has been excluded from passport issuance.

The Service explained that it is currently implementing a phased onboarding process to migrate passport offices—both within Nigeria and at foreign missions—to a centralised passport production framework.

The statement said the initiative, which commenced in 2024, is intended to improve efficiency, enhance security, and strengthen the integrity of the passport production process.

It added that as part of the reforms, passport offices in several North-East and North-Central states—including Borno, Yobe, Benue, Kogi, Nasarawa, Niger, and Plateau—have already been successfully integrated into the new system. In addition, 35 international passport stations across Africa, Asia, Europe, and South America have been onboarded.

The Service further disclosed that the migration of passport offices in the five South-East states—Abia, Anambra, Ebonyi, Enugu, and Imo—alongside five additional foreign missions in Italy, Greece, Spain, Switzerland, and Austria, is currently underway and scheduled for completion within the first quarter of 2026.

To ensure a smooth transition, NIS said it has put in place a structured work-plan calendar designed to prevent disruptions and maintain service delivery timelines throughout the migration period.

The Service urged members of the public to disregard speculative reports capable of creating unnecessary tension, reiterating its commitment to equitable service delivery, national interest, and operational excellence.

NIS Dismisses Claims of Regional Exclusion in Passport Issuance

Continue Reading

Uncategorized

Tinubu’s Diplomatic Offensive, Foreign Trips, and Strategic Gains

Published

on

Tinubu’s Diplomatic Offensive, Foreign Trips, and Strategic Gains
•A harvest Nigeria cannot ignore

By Jude Obioha

In Nigerian politics, perception often travels faster than facts. Few issues illustrate this better than the chorus of criticism surrounding President Bola Ahmed Tinubu’s foreign trips. For months, critics have framed his diplomatic engagements as excessive travel, as political optics over substance. But that narrative is increasingly collapsing under the weight of tangible outcomes. The truth is that Tinubu’s foreign engagements are not leisurely excursions; they are deliberate economic and geopolitical missions, and Nigeria is already harvesting the dividends.

Democracy indeed demands scrutiny, and no president should be immune from public questioning. Yet accountability must be grounded in evidence. After nearly three years in office, the President’s diplomatic drive has begun to reshape Nigeria’s global standing, unlock investments, deepen security cooperation, and reposition the country as a confident actor on the international stage. What critics dismiss as frequent travel is, in reality, a recalibration of Nigeria’s foreign policy, moving from its hitherto passive diplomacy to assertive economic statecraft.

Consider the administration’s approach to global partnerships. Tinubu has revived Nigeria’s relevance as a strategic player across multiple power blocs by working simultaneously with the United States, China, the European Union, Türkiye, Brazil, and the Gulf states, amongst others, without surrendering national autonomy. For decades, Nigeria oscillated between dependence and isolation. Under Tinubu, engagement is now transactional but mutually beneficial and balanced, guided by national interest rather than old master–servant dynamics. The renewed geopolitical confidence is evident in security cooperation, intelligence sharing, and the willingness of global partners to treat Nigeria as a regional anchor in West Africa’s fragile security landscape.

The economic dividends are equally compelling. The President’s visit to China delivered more than ceremonial handshakes; it secured billions in investments aimed at industrialisation and job creation. The $3.3 billion Brass Industrial Park and Methanol Complex alone has the potential to reduce petrochemical imports and strengthen local manufacturing capacity. Agreements with automotive and technology giants are advancing local vehicle assembly, smart city development, and digital infrastructure, which are practical steps toward modernising Nigeria’s urban economy. Added to this are currency cooperation initiatives designed to ease pressure on the naira, making the picture clear: diplomacy is being weaponised for economic stabilisation.

In the United Arab Emirates (UAE), Tinubu’s diplomacy resolved a tense standoff that had grounded flights and restricted visas for Nigerians. The restoration of travel ties was only the beginning. A sweeping economic partnership now offers the UAE duty-free access to thousands of Nigerian products as well as new infrastructure financing and investment frameworks across defence, agriculture, and logistics. The symbolism was powerful: Nigeria negotiated from a position of strength, securing concessions without immediate conditions for debt repayment; an outcome that restored confidence among investors and citizens alike.

Brazil provided another strategic breakthrough. The $1.1 billion Green Imperative Project promises agricultural mechanisation on a scale Nigeria has long struggled to achieve. At the same time, direct Lagos–São Paulo flights under a renewed aviation agreement could unlock billions of dollars in investment. At the same time, by the end of the decade. Meanwhile, partnerships in renewable energy, biotechnology, and local drug manufacturing position Nigeria to reduce import dependence and expand its technological capacity.

Türkiye, often overlooked in public discourse, represents one of the most consequential security partnerships. Agreements covering advanced drone technology, intelligence cooperation, and specialised military training directly strengthen Nigeria’s counter-terrorism operations. Trade relations are also projected to more than double, reflecting a pragmatic blend of defence and economic diplomacy.

Beyond the numbers, Tinubu’s diplomatic posture has demonstrated crisis management. When tensions escalated with the United States over Nigeria’s “Country of Particular Concern” designation, the administration chose dialogue over confrontation. Through structured engagement coordinated by the National Security Adviser (NSA), Mallam Nuhu Ribadu, Nigeria secured deeper defence collaboration and access to much-needed security equipment, as well as training, logistics, and intelligence sharing. It was diplomacy with measurable outcomes.

None of this suggests that criticism should cease. Nigerians are right to demand transparency, cost-efficiency, and clear metrics for every foreign trip. But fairness requires acknowledging results. The administration’s travels have delivered investments, restored diplomatic bridges, opened markets for Nigerian products, and strengthened security alliances at a time when global competition for capital and influence is intense.

The gloves may be off in Nigeria’s political discourse, but facts must remain the referee. Tinubu’s foreign trips are not a distraction from governance; they are a core instrument of his diplomatic, economic and security strategy. In a rapidly shifting global order, a president who stays home risks leaving his country behind. By contrast, Nigeria’s current diplomatic offensive is gradually yielding a bounty, one that could define the nation’s economic and geopolitical trajectory for years to come.

Obioha is the Director of Strategy, Hope Alive Initiative (HAI), a group dedicated to good governance in Nigeria

Continue Reading

Trending

Verified by MonsterInsights