National News
Tinubu Asked to Stop Shell from Selling Remaining Shares
Tinubu Asked to Stop Shell from Selling Remaining Shares
By: Michael Mike
A conglomerate of Civil Society Organisations, community leaders, and concerned citizens have called on President Bola Tinubu to sustain the Nigeria Upstream Petroleum Regulatory Commission’s (NUPRC) rejection of Shell’s request to sell its remaining shares in the Shell Petroleum Development Company (SPDC) to the Renaissance consortium.
The group while alleging that other international oil corporations, such as TotalEnergies, are also attempting to sell their stakes in SPDC and other Nigerian onshore oil assets, stated that any approval of Shell’s and Total’s requests would weaken regulatory independence, ignore the interests of the Niger Delta communities, jeopardize the environmental and social well-being of the region for generations to come, and undermine Nigeria’s sovereignty.
Signatories to the request are Nnimmo Bassey (Health of Mother Earth Foundation (HOMEF)), Dr. Isaac ‘Asume’ Osuoka (Social Action Nigeria), Olanrewaju Suraju (HEDA Resource Centre), Emem Okon (Kebetkache Women Development and Resource Centre),
Akinbode Oluwafemi (Corporate Accountability and Public Participation Africa (CAPPA)), Idoreyin Bassey (League of Queens International Empowerment),
Tijah Bolton-Akpan (Policy Alert), Ken Henshaw (We the People), Rita Uwaka (Environmental Rights Action/Friends of the Earth Nigeria), David Ugolor (Africa Network for Environment and Economic Justice (ANEEJ)) Mfon Utin (Healthy Life Development initiative), Comr. Cynthia Buluebiere Bright (Gbolekekro Women Empowerment And Development Organization (GWEDO)), Auwal Musa Rafsanjani (Civil Society Legislative Advocacy Centre (CISLAC)), Cookey Tammy (Centre for Environment, Human Rights and Development (CEHRD)), Umo Isua-Ikoh (Peace Point Development Foundation),
Friday Nbani (Lekeh Development Foundation)
Others are Amanie Stella (Society for Women and Youths Affairs (SWAYA)), Martha Agbani (Lokiaka Community Development Centre), Akpobari Celestine (People’s Advancement Centre
Ogoni Solidarity Forum), Chido Onumah (Africa Centre for Media and Information Literacy (AFRICMIL)), Ibrahim Zikirullahi (Resource Centre for Human Rights & Civic Education (CHRICED)), Odey Friday (Accountability Lab International Peace and Civic Responsibility Centre (IPCRC)), Arochukwu Ogbonna (Civil Rights Council) and Josesphine Alabi (Keen and Care Initiative)
The group stated that: “We are, again, compelled to ask for a comprehensive halt to all divestment requests from oil corporations in the Niger Delta, including Shell, Total, and other IOCs with similar plans, until the issues of concerned are addressed.”
Among the issues include: It is critical to emphasize that the Nigerian Petroleum Industry Act (PIA) and the NUPRC’s responsibility to uphold this law were clearly outlined when Shell’s divestment request was initially rejected. NUPRC’s refusal was based on legitimate concerns, including Shell’s failure to adequately address the significant environmental and social liabilities associated with its operations in the Niger Delta, as was independently assessed and recommended by international assessors contracted by the country. Among the reasons for rejecting the sale, NUPRC cited the inability of the Renaissance consortium, a shady company with links to past Shell executives and Nigerian political actors, to demonstrate its financial and technical capacities to manage the assets and the pressing need for proper environmental remediation.
NUPRC’s rejection was in line with the responsibilities outlined under Nigerian law and global best practices for corporate accountability. It is a decision rooted in national interest — protecting the health, safety, and environment of the Niger Delta communities. Any attempt to approve Shell’s sale despite these valid concerns would risk undermining regulatory independence and signaling that Nigerian law can be bypassed to serve the interests of multinational corporations.
The Legacy of Pollution and Health Crisis
The environmental and health crises caused by Shell and other oil corporations operating in the Niger Delta are well documented. The United Nations Environment Programme’s (UNEP) report on Ogoniland describes an ecological disaster of immense proportions. UNEP’s findings revealed that:
- Drinking water sources are contaminated with dangerous levels of hydrocarbons, making them unsafe for human consumption.
- Oil spills have destroyed entire ecosystems, killing marine life and damaging the biodiversity that is crucial for the livelihood of local communities.
- The soil in Ogoniland has been contaminated with toxic substances, rendering it infertile and unsuitable for farming, exacerbating food insecurity in the region.
UNEP’s assessment concluded that the cost of remediating the “environmental catastrophe” in Ogoniland alone would exceed $1 billion over the initial five years, with the cleanup expected to last more than 30 years. Yet, these costs are still insufficient to cover the broader environmental impacts of oil extraction across the Niger Delta, where similar damages exist.
The Bayelsa State Oil and Environment Commission’s (BSOEC) report provides a detailed analysis of the severe pollution caused by Shell’s and other multinational companies’ operations, including health impacts on local populations. According to the BSOEC: - High levels of toxins from oil pollution, such as total petroleum hydrocarbons (TPHs) and heavy metals (HMs), have infiltrated the air, water, and soil across the region, contributing to a public health emergency.
- Communities are suffering from respiratory issues, skin diseases, and cancers linked to oil pollution, and these problems are worsening by the year.
- The economic cost of these health impacts and the degradation of natural resources is incalculable, leaving most of the people in poverty and unable to sustain themselves through traditional means like farming and fishing.
The BSOEC report also estimates that the cost of remediating the damage in Bayelsa State alone would exceed $12 billion over 12 years. Based on the UNEP and BSOEC reports, it would take about $100 billion to address the environmental damage in the entire Niger Delta comprehensively. Following the Deepwater Horizon oil spill in the United States, BP, the company responsible, paid over $60 billion to address the impacts of one oil spill incident alone. The environmental damage of the Niger Delta is much worse and has spanned decades. Therefore, to allow Shell, TotalEnergies, or any other company to walk away from their responsibilities would mean transferring these liabilities to the Nigerian state, the Niger Delta states, and the Nigerian people. This is an unjust and unsustainable burden that would further exacerbate the challenges faced by communities already suffering from the effects of pollution and environmental neglect.
Dangerous Lessons from Past Asset Sales
The experiences from past asset sales by Shell, ENI/AGIP, and ExxonMobil offer grave lessons. In the case of Shell’s divestment in Nembe to Aiteo, for instance, the local communities were left with unresolved pollution and no proper remedy for the environmental damage caused by decades of oil extraction. Environmental destruction has worsened in the area. Similarly, when ExxonMobil divested some of its assets, the responsibility for remediation was inadequately transferred to new operators, who were ill-prepared to manage the legacy of contamination. In ENI/AGIP’s case, the sale of assets to Oando continued to worsen the situation in the host communities as there were no comprehensive cleanup efforts undertaken.
These sales not only failed to address the critical environmental liabilities but also deepened the social tensions in the Niger Delta, as new operators took over without addressing the root causes of community unrest or the longstanding health and environmental challenges. This pattern of irresponsible divestment must not be repeated, and the Nigerian government has a responsibility to stop it.
The National Interest and the Urgency for Action
We ask Mr. President to ensure that the immediate financial interests of a few multinational corporations and local profiteers do not outweigh the health, future, and survival of millions of Nigerians who have suffered for decades. President Tinubu must safeguard the future of Nigeria, ensuring that all its people, especially those in the Niger Delta, are not sacrificed for the benefit of global capital and a few local profiteers.
An Approval of the Sale of Shell’s and Total’s Assets Would Be a Declaration of War with the Niger Delta
We want to make it absolutely clear: approving Shell’s or TotalEnergies’ divestment in its current form without addressing the profound environmental and social costs would be a grave injustice to the people of the Niger Delta and could lead to significant unrest in the region. It would be an affront to the generations of Niger Deltans who have fought and died for environmental justice, their homes, and their livelihoods.
Approving Shell’s SPDC share sale would send a dangerous message to all multinational corporations operating in Nigeria that they can extract our resources, leave devastation behind, and walk away without consequence. This is not just a question of corporate accountability; it is about Nigeria’s sovereignty, dignity, and the right of its people to live in a clean and safe environment.
They demanded that President Tinubu: “Immediately halt all divestment processes until a transparent, comprehensive, and inclusive review is undertaken that addresses Shell’s and TotalEnergies’ historical environmental and social liabilities.
“Ensure inclusive and transparent consultation with state governments and the people of the sites of oil and gas extraction in the Niger Delta before any further divestment of IOC assets.
“Hold Shell, TotalEnergies, and all other IOCs accountable for their past and ongoing environmental damage, and ensure they fund a full cleanup and remediation program across the Niger Delta.
“Uphold the regulatory independence of NUPRC and allow it to fulfill its statutory duties without political interference.
“Respect the resolution of the National Assembly, which has called for a halt to all divestments by international oil companies in Nigeria.
“Ensure that new operators are properly vetted and committed to responsible environmental management and community welfare.
“Create an Environmental Restoration Fund that is sufficiently funded to meet the full and complete costs of environmental cleanup and reparations based on credible estimates of independent international experts and contributed to by Shell, TotalEnergies, and other international oil companies and future operators to address the long-term damage caused by their operations.
“Provide community profit-sharing opportunities for host communities as part of any divestment agreement, ensuring that the local people benefit from the oil resources they have hosted for decades.
“Mandate full disclosure of all environmental liabilities before divestment, requiring Shell, TotalEnergies, and any future operators to publicly declare and address all damages.
“Include gas flaring cessation and decommissioning plans in any divestment agreement, with clear timelines for ending harmful practices.
“Account for carbon emissions related to the divested assets and propose mitigation plans that align with Nigeria’s climate commitments.”
They stated that: “This is a defining moment in Nigeria. We urge President Tinubu to stand with the people of the Niger Delta and uphold the values of justice, fairness, and environmental protection. By halting Shell’s, TotalEnergies’ and any other IOC divestment and demanding accountability,
“President Tinubu will send a powerful message that Nigeria’s sovereignty and the welfare of its citizens are paramount.
We ask President Tinubu not to undermine Nigeria’s national interest and the oversight of democratic institutions. We stand ready to continue our advocacy but need President Tinubu to show leadership to ensure a just, sustainable, and prosperous future for all Nigerians.”
Tinubu Asked to Stop Shell from Selling Remaining Shares
National News
Nigeria Launches 2026 Humanitarian Needs and Response Plan, Signals Shift to Resilience and Poverty Reduction
Nigeria Launches 2026 Humanitarian Needs and Response Plan, Signals Shift to Resilience and Poverty Reduction
By: Michael Mike
The Federal Government of Nigeria has launched the 2026 Nigeria Humanitarian Needs and Response Plan (HNRP), reaffirming its commitment to move beyond emergency relief toward prevention, resilience, and sustainable development.
Speaking at the launch held on Thursday at the UN House Auditorium in Abuja, the Honourable Minister of Humanitarian Affairs and Poverty Reduction, Dr. Bernard M. Doro, said Nigeria is at a critical turning point in its humanitarian journey and must transition from repeated crisis response to long-term solutions that reduce vulnerability and poverty.
Dr. Doro commended the United Nations Office for the Coordination of Humanitarian Affairs (OCHA) and humanitarian partners for their collaboration with the Federal Government in developing the 2026 plan and in responding to humanitarian crises across the country. He also acknowledged the leadership of the UN Humanitarian Coordinator in Nigeria, Mohamed M. Fall, and the efforts of donors, civil society organisations, and community-based actors.
According to the minister, humanitarian interventions over the years have played a crucial role in saving lives and alleviating suffering caused by conflict, displacement, climate shocks, and food insecurity, particularly in Borno, Adamawa, and Yobe states. However, he stressed that under the Renewed Hope Agenda of President Bola Ahmed Tinubu, humanitarian assistance must serve as a pathway to recovery and sustainable development rather than a permanent solution.
“The 2026 HNRP represents a strategic shift from repeated emergency response toward prevention, resilience, recovery, and durable solutions aligned with national development priorities,” Dr. Doro said.
He emphasized that the Federal Government would continue to provide leadership in humanitarian coordination, ensuring that interventions align with national policies, strengthen government systems at all levels, and contribute directly to poverty reduction and inclusive growth.
The minister highlighted prevention and preparedness as key priorities, noting that Nigeria can no longer afford to respond only after predictable crises occur. He called for stronger early warning systems, anticipatory action, and risk-informed planning as more humane and cost-effective approaches.
Localization was also identified as a central pillar of the government’s humanitarian strategy. Dr. Doro said Nigerian institutions, civil society groups, women-led and youth-led organisations, and community structures must play a leading role in response and recovery efforts. He added that increasing direct support to local actors and ensuring accountability to affected populations would help build a nationally owned and resilient humanitarian system.
On displacement, the minister stressed the need for durable solutions, stating that humanitarian assistance should not replace governance or development. Instead, efforts must focus on restoring livelihoods, expanding access to basic services, strengthening social protection, and addressing the root causes of vulnerability, including poverty and exclusion.
Dr. Doro reaffirmed Nigeria’s commitment to the Humanitarian–Development–Peace Nexus, describing it as essential for ensuring that humanitarian investments lead to lasting improvements in people’s lives and contribute to peace and social cohesion.
As Nigeria enters a phased humanitarian transition, the government called on international partners to continue working within nationally led frameworks aligned with national priorities. The minister expressed appreciation for the support of the international community while underscoring Nigeria’s determination to lead its humanitarian and poverty reduction agenda.
He concluded by urging stakeholders to see the launch of the 2026 HNRP as a clear move from dependency to resilience, from response to prevention, and from humanitarian management to sustainable human development.
The 2026 Nigeria Humanitarian Needs and Response Plan outlines priority actions aimed at protecting lives, restoring dignity, and building resilient communities across the country.
Nigeria Launches 2026 Humanitarian Needs and Response Plan, Signals Shift to Resilience and Poverty Reduction
National News
FG Moves to Strengthen National Policy on Drought and Desertification
FG Moves to Strengthen National Policy on Drought and Desertification
By: Michael Mike
The Federal Government has reiterated its commitment to tackling drought, desertification, and land degradation through an updated and more responsive national policy framework.
The Minister of Environment, Malam Balarabe Lawal, stated this on Tuesday in Abuja while delivering a keynote address at a two-day validation workshop on the review of the National Drought and Desertification Policy.
The workshop, brought together stakeholders from federal and state governments, development partners, civil society organisations, research institutions, and local communities.
Lawal described drought and desertification as serious environmental threats with far-reaching consequences for agriculture, water security, livelihoods, and national stability, particularly in Nigeria’s arid and semi-arid regions.
He noted that farmers and pastoralists are among the worst affected, as prolonged dry spells lead to crop failure, livestock loss, and increased poverty, while advancing desert conditions continue to reduce land productivity and strain natural resources.
The minister explained that the reviewed policy became necessary due to growing climate risks, population pressure, and changing land-use patterns.
He said the revision process began in July 2025 with an inception meeting involving representatives from all 36 states and the Federal Capital Territory.
According to him, the validation workshop is meant to ensure that the revised document is practical, inclusive, and implementable, with clear strategies, financing mechanisms, and monitoring systems.
Lawal assured participants that the final policy would not be shelved after approval, stressing that government would lead its implementation while working closely with the private sector, civil society, academia, and local communities.
He called on stakeholders to actively contribute during technical sessions, share experiences, and propose workable solutions that reflect the realities of different ecological zones across the country.
The minister also appreciated development partners for their continued support in strengthening Nigeria’s environmental and climate response initiatives.
Declaring the workshop open, Lawal expressed optimism that the revised policy would significantly improve national efforts to combat desertification, restore degraded lands, and build resilience against drought.
On his part, the Permanent Secretary of the Ministry of Environment, Mahmud Kambari, noted that Nigeria is increasingly vulnerable to drought, desertification, and land degradation, with serious implications for food security, livelihoods, biodiversity, and national development.
He said climate change and unsustainable land and water use practices have further deepened the country’s exposure to environmental risks.
Kambari explained that the existing policy framework, though useful in the past, no longer adequately addresses emerging climate realities and evolving national and international commitments. He said this necessitated a comprehensive review aimed at strengthening early warning systems, improving preparedness, and building resilience against environmental shocks.
He added that the revised policy must align with Nigeria’s obligations under the United Nations Convention to Combat Desertification (UNCCD), including its Land Degradation Neutrality targets. According to him, the ministry, through its Department of Desertification, Land Degradation and Drought Management, would ensure effective coordination and implementation of the new policy.
The Director Department of Desertification and Drought in the Ministry of Environment, Regina Nwaneri explained that the validation workshop is focuses on validating an updated Desertification, Land Degradation and Drought Management Policy, stressing that the existing policy dates back to 2007 and no longer reflects current realities.
FG Moves to Strengthen National Policy on Drought and Desertification
National News
2027: Vice President Kashim Shettima Standing Tall Amidst Misguided Oppositions
2027: Vice President Kashim Shettima Standing Tall Amidst Misguided Oppositions
By: Hon. Yusuf Adamu
In a country often marred by speculation and divisive rhetoric, the insinuations from opposition factions regarding the potential replacement of Shettima by “mischief-makers” are not only misguided but also reflective of a fundamental misunderstanding of the dynamics at play within Nigerian politics.
It is imperative to acknowledge the significance of partnerships in political leadership. Vice President Kashim Shettima has uniquely positioned himself as a pivotal figure in this administration, not merely as a subordinate but as a strategic ally to President Tinubu. Their relationship is rooted in mutual respect and shared goals, transcending partisan interests and religious affiliations.
Contrary to the narratives spun by opposition voices, there has been no indication from President Tinubu regarding any intention to replace his vice president. This sentiment is echoed by the general populace who recognize the necessity of stability and continuity during these critical times.
The intricacies of Tinubu and Shettima’s alliance are further underscored by their respective backgrounds and experiences. Both leaders have weathered the storms of political challenges and have showcased resilience that resonates with the Nigerian electorate.
It is essential not to reduce their achievements or the worth of their partnership to mere religious identities—Muslim – Muslim. Such simplifications undermine the rich tapestry of relationships that they have cultivated across different demographics throughout their political careers.
One cannot overlook the years of camaraderie, exemplified by Kashim Shettima’s longstanding friendships, particularly with notable figures such as Dr. James Bwala, who has written hundreds of articles in publications online either promoting or defending the vice president. This enduring relationship is illustrative of Shettima’s capacity to foster cross-cultural connections and to engage meaningfully with individuals from various backgrounds.
His engagement with Christians and their communities has been robust, demonstrating that his political strategy is inclusive rather than exclusionary. Shettima’s authentic relationships illustrate his commitment to unity and collaboration, affirming that the political landscape can be navigated without falling prey to division based on religious lines.
Also Shettima’s heritage plays a crucial role in this narrative. Hailing from the El-Kanemi lineage, he draws upon a rich historical legacy that reinforces his credibility. His familial and political roots in northern Nigeria provide a strategic advantage for Tinubu’s administration, enabling effective outreach and engagement in a region that holds considerable sway in national politics.
This familiarity, combined with Shettima’s adept handling of political maneuverings, ensures that the partnership remains compelling, maintaining its relevance well into the future.
The skepticism from opposition parties about the viability of this partnership is not new. Historically, political alliances in Nigeria have been fraught with uncertainty and betrayal. However, an examination of this particular partnership reveals a contrasting story marked by tenacity and strategic foresight.
As opposition narratives swirl, Tinubu and Shettima are focused on governance, leveraging their strengths to address the multifaceted challenges facing the nation. Shettima’s international representation on behalf of the President speaks volumes of the trust and confidence placed in him, a testament to his effectiveness as a vice president and a political partner.
As we reflect on the broader implications of this partnership, it becomes evident that the political landscape is evolving. The criticisms hurled by mischief-makers serve not to deter but to galvanize support for Tinubu’s administration. In fact, the apparent disconnect between the actions of the opposition and the realities on the ground may very well be hindering their ability to connect with the electorate.
People are increasingly discerning and capable of distinguishing between politically motivated rhetoric and genuine leadership. In light of this, it is critical to underscore the importance of vision and coherence in leadership. The synergy between Tinubu and Shettima can be characterized as emblematic of a larger movement aimed at fostering development, inclusivity, and progress within Nigeria.
Their collective vision, grounded in principles of governance that resonate across diverse groups, positions them as a formidable force against any opposition efforts that seek to undermine their mission.
Also, examining the socio-political context it reveals that the partnership extends beyond mere electoral calculations. It is about nurturing a cohesive Nigeria where all citizens can thrive irrespective of their religious beliefs. This notion should be taken into account when evaluating the efficacy of the administration.
As both leaders navigate complex political terrains, it is essential to recognize that their administration seeks to embody a spirit of unity, promoting peace and collaboration amongst varied sectors of the population. The partnership between President Bola Ahmed Tinubu and Vice President Kashim Shettima is not only enduring but also transformative.
Critics and naysayers may attempt to dismantle this alliance through speculation and unfounded allegations, yet the evidence supports a different narrative—one of resilience, unity, and a shared vision for Nigeria’s future. While the opposition may continue their machinations, the focus must remain on the substantive work that both leaders are undertaking in service to their country.
This partnership, built on strength, mutual respect, and a profound understanding of Nigeria’s socio-political landscape, is poised to remain intact and fruitful until at least 2031. Ours is a time for action, partnership, and unwavering commitment to the ideals that will propel Nigeria towards a brighter future.
Hon. Yusuf Adamu, writes from Maiduguri
2027: Vice President Kashim Shettima Standing Tall Amidst Misguided Oppositions
-
News2 years agoRoger Federer’s Shock as DNA Results Reveal Myla and Charlene Are Not His Biological Children
-
Opinions4 years agoTHE PLIGHT OF FARIDA
-
News9 months agoFAILED COUP IN BURKINA FASO: HOW TRAORÉ NARROWLY ESCAPED ASSASSINATION PLOT AMID FOREIGN INTERFERENCE CLAIMS
-
Opinions4 years agoPOLICE CHARGE ROOMS, A MINTING PRESS
-
News2 years agoEYN: Rev. Billi, Distortion of History, and The Living Tamarind Tree
-
ACADEMICS2 years agoA History of Biu” (2015) and The Lingering Bura-Pabir Question (1)
-
Columns2 years agoArmy University Biu: There is certain interest, but certainly not from Borno.
-
Opinions2 years agoTinubu,Shettima: The epidemic of economic, insecurity in Nigeria
