Connect with us

National News

Tinubu Asked to Stop Shell from Selling Remaining Shares

Published

on

Tinubu Asked to Stop Shell from Selling Remaining Shares

By: Michael Mike

A conglomerate of Civil Society Organisations, community leaders, and concerned citizens have called on President Bola Tinubu to sustain the Nigeria Upstream Petroleum Regulatory Commission’s (NUPRC) rejection of Shell’s request to sell its remaining shares in the Shell Petroleum Development Company (SPDC) to the Renaissance consortium.

The group while alleging that other international oil corporations, such as TotalEnergies, are also attempting to sell their stakes in SPDC and other Nigerian onshore oil assets, stated that any approval of Shell’s and Total’s requests would weaken regulatory independence, ignore the interests of the Niger Delta communities, jeopardize the environmental and social well-being of the region for generations to come, and undermine Nigeria’s sovereignty.

Signatories to the request are Nnimmo Bassey (Health of Mother Earth Foundation (HOMEF)), Dr. Isaac ‘Asume’ Osuoka (Social Action Nigeria), Olanrewaju Suraju (HEDA Resource Centre), Emem Okon (Kebetkache Women Development and Resource Centre),
Akinbode Oluwafemi (Corporate Accountability and Public Participation Africa (CAPPA)), Idoreyin Bassey (League of Queens International Empowerment),
Tijah Bolton-Akpan (Policy Alert), Ken Henshaw (We the People), Rita Uwaka (Environmental Rights Action/Friends of the Earth Nigeria), David Ugolor (Africa Network for Environment and Economic Justice (ANEEJ)) Mfon Utin (Healthy Life Development initiative), Comr. Cynthia Buluebiere Bright (Gbolekekro Women Empowerment And Development Organization (GWEDO)), Auwal Musa Rafsanjani (Civil Society Legislative Advocacy Centre (CISLAC)), Cookey Tammy (Centre for Environment, Human Rights and Development (CEHRD)), Umo Isua-Ikoh (Peace Point Development Foundation),
Friday Nbani (Lekeh Development Foundation)

Others are Amanie Stella  (Society for Women and Youths Affairs (SWAYA)), Martha Agbani (Lokiaka Community Development Centre), Akpobari Celestine (People’s Advancement Centre
Ogoni Solidarity Forum), Chido Onumah (Africa Centre for Media and Information Literacy (AFRICMIL)), Ibrahim Zikirullahi (Resource Centre for Human Rights & Civic Education (CHRICED)), Odey Friday (Accountability Lab International Peace and Civic Responsibility Centre (IPCRC)), Arochukwu Ogbonna (Civil Rights Council) and Josesphine Alabi (Keen and Care Initiative)

The group stated that: “We are, again, compelled to ask for a comprehensive halt to all divestment requests from oil corporations in the Niger Delta, including Shell, Total, and other IOCs with similar plans, until the issues of concerned are addressed.”

Among the issues include: It is critical to emphasize that the Nigerian Petroleum Industry Act (PIA) and the NUPRC’s responsibility to uphold this law were clearly outlined when  Shell’s divestment request was initially rejected. NUPRC’s refusal was based on legitimate concerns, including Shell’s failure to adequately address the significant environmental and social liabilities associated with its operations in the Niger Delta, as was independently assessed and recommended by international assessors contracted by the country. Among the reasons for rejecting the sale, NUPRC cited the inability of the Renaissance consortium, a shady company with links to past Shell executives and Nigerian political actors, to demonstrate its financial and technical capacities to manage the assets and the pressing need for proper environmental remediation.
NUPRC’s rejection was in line with the responsibilities outlined under Nigerian law and global best practices for corporate accountability. It is a decision rooted in national interest — protecting the health, safety, and environment of the Niger Delta communities. Any attempt to approve Shell’s sale despite these valid concerns would risk undermining regulatory independence and signaling that Nigerian law can be bypassed to serve the interests of multinational corporations.
The Legacy of Pollution and Health Crisis
The environmental and health crises caused by Shell and other oil corporations operating in the Niger Delta are well documented. The United Nations Environment Programme’s (UNEP) report on Ogoniland describes an ecological disaster of immense proportions. UNEP’s findings revealed that:

  •    Drinking water sources are contaminated with dangerous levels of hydrocarbons, making them unsafe for human consumption.
  •    Oil spills have destroyed entire ecosystems, killing marine life and damaging the biodiversity that is crucial for the livelihood of local communities.
  •    The soil in Ogoniland has been contaminated with toxic substances, rendering it infertile and unsuitable for farming, exacerbating food insecurity in the region.
    UNEP’s assessment concluded that the cost of remediating the “environmental catastrophe” in Ogoniland alone would exceed $1 billion over the initial five years, with the cleanup expected to last more than 30 years. Yet, these costs are still insufficient to cover the broader environmental impacts of oil extraction across the Niger Delta, where similar damages exist.
    The Bayelsa State Oil and Environment Commission’s (BSOEC) report provides a detailed analysis of the severe pollution caused by Shell’s and other multinational companies’  operations, including health impacts on local populations. According to the BSOEC:
  •    High levels of toxins from oil pollution, such as total petroleum hydrocarbons (TPHs) and heavy metals (HMs), have infiltrated the air, water, and soil across the region, contributing to a public health emergency.
  •    Communities are suffering from respiratory issues, skin diseases, and cancers linked to oil pollution, and these problems are worsening by the year.
  •    The economic cost of these health impacts and the degradation of natural resources is incalculable, leaving most of the people in poverty and unable to sustain themselves through traditional means like farming and fishing.
    The BSOEC report also estimates that the cost of remediating the damage in Bayelsa State alone would exceed $12 billion over 12 years. Based on the UNEP and BSOEC reports, it would take about $100 billion to address the environmental damage in the entire Niger Delta comprehensively. Following the Deepwater Horizon oil spill in the United States, BP, the company responsible, paid over $60 billion to address the impacts of one oil spill incident alone. The environmental damage of the Niger Delta is much worse and has spanned decades. Therefore, to allow Shell, TotalEnergies, or any other company to walk away from their responsibilities would mean transferring these liabilities to the Nigerian state, the Niger Delta states, and the Nigerian people. This is an unjust and unsustainable burden that would further exacerbate the challenges faced by communities already suffering from the effects of pollution and environmental neglect.
    Dangerous Lessons from Past Asset Sales
    The experiences from past asset sales by Shell, ENI/AGIP, and ExxonMobil offer grave lessons. In the case of Shell’s divestment in Nembe to Aiteo, for instance, the local communities were left with unresolved pollution and no proper remedy for the environmental damage caused by decades of oil extraction. Environmental destruction has worsened in the area. Similarly, when ExxonMobil divested some of its assets, the responsibility for remediation was inadequately transferred to new operators, who were ill-prepared to manage the legacy of contamination. In ENI/AGIP’s case, the sale of assets to Oando continued to worsen the situation in the host communities as there were no comprehensive cleanup efforts undertaken.
    These sales not only failed to address the critical environmental liabilities but also deepened the social tensions in the Niger Delta, as new operators took over without addressing the root causes of community unrest or the longstanding health and environmental challenges. This pattern of irresponsible divestment must not be repeated, and the Nigerian government has a responsibility to stop it.
    The National Interest and the Urgency for Action
    We ask Mr. President to ensure that the immediate financial interests of a few multinational corporations and local profiteers do not outweigh the health, future, and survival of millions of Nigerians who have suffered for decades. President Tinubu must safeguard the future of Nigeria, ensuring that all its people, especially those in the Niger Delta, are not sacrificed for the benefit of global capital and a few local profiteers.
    An Approval of the Sale of Shell’s and Total’s Assets Would Be a Declaration of War with the Niger Delta
    We want to make it absolutely clear: approving Shell’s or TotalEnergies’ divestment in its current form without addressing the profound environmental and social costs would be a grave injustice to the people of the Niger Delta and could lead to significant unrest in the region. It would be an affront to the generations of Niger Deltans who have fought and died for environmental justice, their homes, and their livelihoods.
    Approving Shell’s SPDC share sale would send a dangerous message to all multinational corporations operating in Nigeria that they can extract our resources, leave devastation behind, and walk away without consequence. This is not just a question of corporate accountability; it is about Nigeria’s sovereignty, dignity, and the right of its people to live in a clean and safe environment.
    They demanded that President Tinubu: “Immediately halt all divestment processes until a transparent, comprehensive, and inclusive review is undertaken that addresses Shell’s and TotalEnergies’ historical environmental and social liabilities.

“Ensure inclusive and transparent consultation with state governments and the people of the sites of oil and gas extraction in the Niger Delta before any further divestment of IOC assets.

“Hold Shell, TotalEnergies, and all other IOCs accountable for their past and ongoing environmental damage, and ensure they fund a full cleanup and remediation program across the Niger Delta.

“Uphold the regulatory independence of NUPRC and allow it to fulfill its statutory duties without political interference.

“Respect the resolution of the National Assembly, which has called for a halt to all divestments by international oil companies in Nigeria.

“Ensure that new operators are properly vetted and committed to responsible environmental management and community welfare.

“Create an Environmental Restoration Fund that is sufficiently funded to meet the full and complete costs of environmental cleanup and reparations based on credible estimates of independent international experts and contributed to by Shell, TotalEnergies, and other international oil companies and future operators to address the long-term damage caused by their operations.

“Provide community profit-sharing opportunities for host communities as part of any divestment agreement, ensuring that the local people benefit from the oil resources they have hosted for decades.

“Mandate full disclosure of all environmental liabilities before divestment, requiring Shell, TotalEnergies, and any future operators to publicly declare and address all damages.

“Include gas flaring cessation and decommissioning plans in any divestment agreement, with clear timelines for ending harmful practices.

“Account for carbon emissions related to the divested assets and propose mitigation plans that align with Nigeria’s climate commitments.”

They stated that: “This is a defining moment in Nigeria. We urge President Tinubu to stand with the people of the Niger Delta and uphold the values of justice, fairness, and environmental protection. By halting Shell’s, TotalEnergies’ and any other IOC divestment and demanding accountability,

“President Tinubu will send a powerful message that Nigeria’s sovereignty and the welfare of its citizens are paramount.
We ask President Tinubu not to undermine Nigeria’s national interest and the oversight of democratic institutions. We stand ready to continue our advocacy but need President Tinubu to show leadership to ensure a just, sustainable, and prosperous future for all Nigerians.”

Tinubu Asked to Stop Shell from Selling Remaining Shares

Continue Reading
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

National News

From Ports to Food: How Partnership with China is Driving Nigeria’s Economic Transformation

Published

on

From Ports to Food: How Partnership with China is Driving Nigeria’s Economic Transformation

By: Adeola Adelabu

For years, Nigeria’s conversations around economic transformation have been long on ambition but short on execution. Increasingly, however, a more pragmatic pattern is emerging, one defined by structured partnerships, targeted investments, and a growing emphasis on delivery. Nowhere is this shift more visible than in the evolving relationship between Nigeria and China.

As bilateral cooperation deepens, a broad portfolio of projects spanning infrastructure, manufacturing, and agriculture is beginning to reshape Nigeria’s economic trajectory. The emerging signal is clear: development is no longer being framed solely around policy intent, but around measurable outcomes.

A clear demonstration of this shift is the operational success of the Lekki Deep Sea Port. Developed in partnership with China Harbour Engineering Company (CHEC), the port stands as one of the most significant private-sector-led infrastructure investments in Nigeria in recent years. With over $1 billion in equity contribution by CHEC, the facility is now fully operational, easing port congestion, improving cargo handling efficiency, and strengthening Nigeria’s position as a maritime gateway for West Africa.

Beyond its infrastructure value, Lekki Deep Sea Port is increasingly seen as a case study in what structured international partnerships can deliver when aligned with domestic priorities. It highlights a key lesson: investment alone is not sufficient; execution, governance, and operational sustainability are what convert capital into national value.
However, infrastructure is only the starting point of industrial transformation. The next frontier lies in rebuilding Nigeria’s productive base, particularly in steel. No modern economy achieves industrial depth without a functioning steel industry, and this reality places renewed attention on the revival of the Ajaokuta Steel Company.

For decades, Ajaokuta has remained an unfulfilled potential. Yet, renewed collaboration involving Chinese technical and investment partners has reopened the possibility of repositioning it as a core pillar of Nigeria’s industrial ecosystem. A functional steel plant would reduce import dependency, lower production costs across sectors, and stimulate downstream industries such as construction, fabrication, and manufacturing.

The strategic logic is further reinforced by Nigeria’s resource endowment, particularly iron ore deposits in Itakpe, Lokoja and Ogun state. Combined with improving logistics infrastructure, including rail and inland transport corridors, the fundamentals for a viable steel value chain are present. What remains critical is execution discipline and sustained policy continuity over time.

If infrastructure and steel represent the backbone of industrialisation, agriculture represents its most immediate and socially visible impact. In a context where food inflation continues to pressure household incomes, interventions that directly affect food supply and pricing carry both economic and political significance. This is where the National Integrated Poultry Project becomes particularly consequential.

According to Joseph Tegbe, the project is designed to address structural constraints in Nigeria’s poultry value chain, particularly high feed costs and supply inefficiencies. By integrating large-scale poultry production with domestic cultivation of key feed inputs such as maize and soybean, the initiative directly targets the most significant cost drivers in the sector.

The economic rationale is straightforward: reducing feed costs lowers production costs, and lower production costs improve affordability for consumers. In practical terms, this is expected to translate into more accessible prices for eggs and poultry products, which remain critical sources of affordable protein for millions of Nigerian households.

The implications extend beyond consumers to producers. Poultry farmers, many of whom operate under volatile input pricing and thin margins, stand to benefit from more stable feed supply chains and reduced production costs. This could enhance profitability, encourage sector expansion, and strengthen resilience across the agricultural value chain.

The scale of ambition is significant. Pilot phases are scheduled for Kaduna and Oyo States, with plans for national expansion thereafter. Each integrated facility is expected to operate at industrial scale, housing up over one million layer birds alongside substantial broiler capacity, and collectively producing millions of eggs daily.

The programme is projected to generate tens of thousands of direct jobs and hundreds of thousands of indirect opportunities across farming, logistics, processing, and distribution.

Yet, Nigeria’s development history underscores an important caution: ambition does not automatically translate into impact. The country has seen several large-scale agricultural and industrial programmes falter due to weak coordination, inconsistent policy implementation, and limited accountability mechanisms.

This makes execution the defining variable. Clear timelines, institutional coordination, and measurable performance indicators will determine whether these initiatives become transformational or remain under-realised potential.

Encouragingly, recent engagements under the Nigeria–China Strategic Partnership indicate that over $20 billion in investment commitments have been mobilised across agriculture, mining, automotive manufacturing, and energy.

While this signals strong investor confidence, commitments must ultimately be judged by outcomes, jobs created, food prices reduced, industries strengthened, and productivity improved.

Taken together, the trajectory from Lekki Deep Sea Port to Ajaokuta Steel and the National Integrated Poultry Project reflects a more integrated approach to economic development, one that connects infrastructure, industry, and food systems within a single framework of cooperation. The Nigeria–China partnership is therefore evolving beyond diplomacy into an economic delivery platform. The real question is no longer about the scale of ambition, but the consistency of execution.

If Nigeria succeeds, the impact will be tangible: lower food costs, stronger industrial capacity, and expanded employment opportunities. If it fails, these initiatives risk joining a long list of unrealised development plans. Ultimately, the difference will be defined not by vision, but by execution.

Adeola Adelabu is the Lead, Media and Public Relations at the Nigeria–China Strategic Partnership (NCSP).

From Ports to Food: How Partnership with China is Driving Nigeria’s Economic Transformation

Continue Reading

National News

Nigeria Launches Nationwide Drive to Safely Manage Small Battery Waste

Published

on

Nigeria Launches Nationwide Drive to Safely Manage Small Battery Waste

By: Michael Mike

Nigeria has taken a major step toward tackling a fast-growing but often overlooked environmental threat with the launch of a national initiative to ensure the safe collection and recycling of small-sized waste batteries.

Unveiled at the Federal Ministry of Environment’s Green Building in Abuja, the programme introduces a structured system for the environmentally sound management of discarded household batteries—ranging from button cells in wristwatches to AA and AAA batteries in remote controls, as well as lithium-ion units powering mobile phones and other portable devices.

Speaking at the event, Minister of Environment, Balarabe Lawal, described the initiative as a decisive intervention to close a long-standing gap in Nigeria’s waste management system.

He noted that while large batteries such as those used in vehicles often attract recycling value, smaller batteries are routinely ignored and improperly disposed of, posing serious risks to both human health and the environment.

“These small-sized batteries are deceptively dangerous,” the minister said. “They are easily discarded, yet they contain toxic substances that can contaminate our soil, water, and food systems. This initiative is about protecting lives—especially those of women and children who are most vulnerable to the impacts of environmental pollution.”

At the core of the programme is the deployment of specially designed collection receptacles across strategic locations in the Federal Capital Territory, including markets, schools, offices, and motor parks. The goal is to make safe disposal accessible at the point of use, ensuring that hazardous battery waste does not end up in dumpsites or informal recycling channels.

The initiative is being implemented in partnership with the Alliance for Responsible Battery Recycling (ARBR), the Producer Responsibility Organisation for Nigeria’s battery sector under the Extended Producer Responsibility (EPR) framework.

Established in 2019, ARBR is tasked with coordinating the collection, transportation, and environmentally compliant recycling of battery waste nationwide.

Providing an overview of the project, ARBR representatives highlighted the growing volume of small battery waste driven by increased technology use and energy access across Nigeria. Despite their widespread use, these batteries often enter general waste streams at the end of their lifecycle, releasing hazardous materials such as cadmium, mercury, nickel, lithium, and lead into the environment.

“Collection is the foundation of environmentally sound management,” ARBR stated. “Without it, the entire value chain—from transportation and storage to treatment and recycling—breaks down. This project is designed to ensure that these batteries are captured early and directed into safe, regulated systems.”

Beyond collection, the programme establishes a coordinated downstream process involving the evacuation of collected batteries to central aggregation hubs, from where they will be transported to licensed recycling facilities, including export where necessary under national regulations. Key partners, including the Abuja Environmental Protection Board (AEPB) and the Waste Pickers Association of Nigeria (WAPAN), are expected to play critical roles in ensuring the system’s efficiency and sustainability.

The initiative is anchored on Nigeria’s National Policy on Battery Waste Management (2022) and the National Environmental (Battery Control) Regulations (2024), which mandate the responsible lifecycle management of batteries in line with global environmental standards.

In a goodwill message, the Director General of the National Environmental Standards and Regulations Enforcement Agency (NESREA), Prof. Innocent Barikor, described the launch as a strong demonstration of Nigeria’s commitment to meeting its obligations under international environmental agreements, including the Basel Convention on hazardous waste.

He emphasized that the rapid proliferation of battery-powered devices has created an escalating waste stream that demands urgent and coordinated regulatory action.

“This is not just a technical exercise,” Barikor said. “It is a declaration of intent that Nigeria is ready to protect public health and preserve its ecosystems through science-based and enforceable solutions.”

He further noted that the initiative builds on groundwork laid under the PROBAMET project, which helped map informal sector activities, identify infrastructure gaps, and raise awareness among stakeholders in the battery value chain.

Stakeholders at the event commended the Federal Ministry of Environment for its leadership, while also acknowledging the role of international development partners in providing technical and financial support for the project.

Experts say the initiative could also unlock economic opportunities by integrating informal waste collectors into formal systems and advancing Nigeria’s circular economy agenda—where waste is treated as a resource rather than a burden.

As the programme rolls out, officials are calling on Nigerians to adopt responsible disposal habits, stressing that the success of the initiative depends not only on infrastructure but also on public participation.

“Every battery properly disposed of is a life protected and an ecosystem preserved,” the minister said. “This is the beginning of a nationwide movement toward cleaner, safer environmental practices.”

The launch marks what stakeholders describe as a critical turning point in Nigeria’s approach to hazardous waste management, with expectations that the model could be expanded beyond the Federal Capital Territory to other parts of the country in the near future.

Nigeria Launches Nationwide Drive to Safely Manage Small Battery Waste

Continue Reading

National News

US. Embassy Abuja Seals Landmark Tech Partnership with Ilorin Innovation Hub

Published

on

US. Embassy Abuja Seals Landmark Tech Partnership with Ilorin Innovation Hub

By: Michael Mike

The U.S. Embassy Abuja has signed a three-year Memorandum of Understanding (MOU) with the Ilorin Innovation Hub, launching its first public-private partnership outside the American Spaces Network and signaling a strategic expansion of U.S. engagement in Nigeria’s fast-growing technology ecosystem.

The agreement, formalized at a ceremony in Abuja, is set to deepen collaboration in artificial intelligence (AI), science, technology, engineering, and mathematics (STEM), as well as professional development, particularly targeting young innovators and tech professionals in Kwara State.

Speaking at the event, U.S. Embassy Public Diplomacy Counselor Lee McManis described the partnership as a significant step toward strengthening innovation-led economic ties between Nigeria and the United States. He noted that Kwara is steadily emerging as a technology hub, attracting growing interest from American companies eager to invest, compete, and collaborate within the region’s evolving digital economy.

Under the terms of the MOU, both parties will roll out a series of programs showcasing American leadership in technology and innovation. These initiatives will include business English training, STEM-focused education, and capacity-building workshops designed to align Nigerian talent with the demands of U.S. industries.

The partnership is also expected to create new pathways for knowledge exchange, entrepreneurship, and workforce development, reinforcing broader efforts to position Nigeria as a competitive player in the global tech landscape.

Officials say the initiative reflects a shared vision centered on innovation, education, and opportunity as drivers of sustainable economic growth. The collaboration is poised to not only empower local talent but also strengthen bilateral relations through practical, skills-based engagement.

With this move, the U.S. Embassy is extending its footprint beyond traditional platforms, embracing targeted partnerships that directly impact emerging innovation ecosystems across Nigeria.

US. Embassy Abuja Seals Landmark Tech Partnership with Ilorin Innovation Hub

Continue Reading

Trending

Verified by MonsterInsights