National News
Tinubu Asked to Stop Shell from Selling Remaining Shares
Tinubu Asked to Stop Shell from Selling Remaining Shares
By: Michael Mike
A conglomerate of Civil Society Organisations, community leaders, and concerned citizens have called on President Bola Tinubu to sustain the Nigeria Upstream Petroleum Regulatory Commission’s (NUPRC) rejection of Shell’s request to sell its remaining shares in the Shell Petroleum Development Company (SPDC) to the Renaissance consortium.
The group while alleging that other international oil corporations, such as TotalEnergies, are also attempting to sell their stakes in SPDC and other Nigerian onshore oil assets, stated that any approval of Shell’s and Total’s requests would weaken regulatory independence, ignore the interests of the Niger Delta communities, jeopardize the environmental and social well-being of the region for generations to come, and undermine Nigeria’s sovereignty.
Signatories to the request are Nnimmo Bassey (Health of Mother Earth Foundation (HOMEF)), Dr. Isaac ‘Asume’ Osuoka (Social Action Nigeria), Olanrewaju Suraju (HEDA Resource Centre), Emem Okon (Kebetkache Women Development and Resource Centre),
Akinbode Oluwafemi (Corporate Accountability and Public Participation Africa (CAPPA)), Idoreyin Bassey (League of Queens International Empowerment),
Tijah Bolton-Akpan (Policy Alert), Ken Henshaw (We the People), Rita Uwaka (Environmental Rights Action/Friends of the Earth Nigeria), David Ugolor (Africa Network for Environment and Economic Justice (ANEEJ)) Mfon Utin (Healthy Life Development initiative), Comr. Cynthia Buluebiere Bright (Gbolekekro Women Empowerment And Development Organization (GWEDO)), Auwal Musa Rafsanjani (Civil Society Legislative Advocacy Centre (CISLAC)), Cookey Tammy (Centre for Environment, Human Rights and Development (CEHRD)), Umo Isua-Ikoh (Peace Point Development Foundation),
Friday Nbani (Lekeh Development Foundation)
Others are Amanie Stella (Society for Women and Youths Affairs (SWAYA)), Martha Agbani (Lokiaka Community Development Centre), Akpobari Celestine (People’s Advancement Centre
Ogoni Solidarity Forum), Chido Onumah (Africa Centre for Media and Information Literacy (AFRICMIL)), Ibrahim Zikirullahi (Resource Centre for Human Rights & Civic Education (CHRICED)), Odey Friday (Accountability Lab International Peace and Civic Responsibility Centre (IPCRC)), Arochukwu Ogbonna (Civil Rights Council) and Josesphine Alabi (Keen and Care Initiative)
The group stated that: “We are, again, compelled to ask for a comprehensive halt to all divestment requests from oil corporations in the Niger Delta, including Shell, Total, and other IOCs with similar plans, until the issues of concerned are addressed.”
Among the issues include: It is critical to emphasize that the Nigerian Petroleum Industry Act (PIA) and the NUPRC’s responsibility to uphold this law were clearly outlined when Shell’s divestment request was initially rejected. NUPRC’s refusal was based on legitimate concerns, including Shell’s failure to adequately address the significant environmental and social liabilities associated with its operations in the Niger Delta, as was independently assessed and recommended by international assessors contracted by the country. Among the reasons for rejecting the sale, NUPRC cited the inability of the Renaissance consortium, a shady company with links to past Shell executives and Nigerian political actors, to demonstrate its financial and technical capacities to manage the assets and the pressing need for proper environmental remediation.
NUPRC’s rejection was in line with the responsibilities outlined under Nigerian law and global best practices for corporate accountability. It is a decision rooted in national interest — protecting the health, safety, and environment of the Niger Delta communities. Any attempt to approve Shell’s sale despite these valid concerns would risk undermining regulatory independence and signaling that Nigerian law can be bypassed to serve the interests of multinational corporations.
The Legacy of Pollution and Health Crisis
The environmental and health crises caused by Shell and other oil corporations operating in the Niger Delta are well documented. The United Nations Environment Programme’s (UNEP) report on Ogoniland describes an ecological disaster of immense proportions. UNEP’s findings revealed that:
- Drinking water sources are contaminated with dangerous levels of hydrocarbons, making them unsafe for human consumption.
- Oil spills have destroyed entire ecosystems, killing marine life and damaging the biodiversity that is crucial for the livelihood of local communities.
- The soil in Ogoniland has been contaminated with toxic substances, rendering it infertile and unsuitable for farming, exacerbating food insecurity in the region.
UNEP’s assessment concluded that the cost of remediating the “environmental catastrophe” in Ogoniland alone would exceed $1 billion over the initial five years, with the cleanup expected to last more than 30 years. Yet, these costs are still insufficient to cover the broader environmental impacts of oil extraction across the Niger Delta, where similar damages exist.
The Bayelsa State Oil and Environment Commission’s (BSOEC) report provides a detailed analysis of the severe pollution caused by Shell’s and other multinational companies’ operations, including health impacts on local populations. According to the BSOEC: - High levels of toxins from oil pollution, such as total petroleum hydrocarbons (TPHs) and heavy metals (HMs), have infiltrated the air, water, and soil across the region, contributing to a public health emergency.
- Communities are suffering from respiratory issues, skin diseases, and cancers linked to oil pollution, and these problems are worsening by the year.
- The economic cost of these health impacts and the degradation of natural resources is incalculable, leaving most of the people in poverty and unable to sustain themselves through traditional means like farming and fishing.
The BSOEC report also estimates that the cost of remediating the damage in Bayelsa State alone would exceed $12 billion over 12 years. Based on the UNEP and BSOEC reports, it would take about $100 billion to address the environmental damage in the entire Niger Delta comprehensively. Following the Deepwater Horizon oil spill in the United States, BP, the company responsible, paid over $60 billion to address the impacts of one oil spill incident alone. The environmental damage of the Niger Delta is much worse and has spanned decades. Therefore, to allow Shell, TotalEnergies, or any other company to walk away from their responsibilities would mean transferring these liabilities to the Nigerian state, the Niger Delta states, and the Nigerian people. This is an unjust and unsustainable burden that would further exacerbate the challenges faced by communities already suffering from the effects of pollution and environmental neglect.
Dangerous Lessons from Past Asset Sales
The experiences from past asset sales by Shell, ENI/AGIP, and ExxonMobil offer grave lessons. In the case of Shell’s divestment in Nembe to Aiteo, for instance, the local communities were left with unresolved pollution and no proper remedy for the environmental damage caused by decades of oil extraction. Environmental destruction has worsened in the area. Similarly, when ExxonMobil divested some of its assets, the responsibility for remediation was inadequately transferred to new operators, who were ill-prepared to manage the legacy of contamination. In ENI/AGIP’s case, the sale of assets to Oando continued to worsen the situation in the host communities as there were no comprehensive cleanup efforts undertaken.
These sales not only failed to address the critical environmental liabilities but also deepened the social tensions in the Niger Delta, as new operators took over without addressing the root causes of community unrest or the longstanding health and environmental challenges. This pattern of irresponsible divestment must not be repeated, and the Nigerian government has a responsibility to stop it.
The National Interest and the Urgency for Action
We ask Mr. President to ensure that the immediate financial interests of a few multinational corporations and local profiteers do not outweigh the health, future, and survival of millions of Nigerians who have suffered for decades. President Tinubu must safeguard the future of Nigeria, ensuring that all its people, especially those in the Niger Delta, are not sacrificed for the benefit of global capital and a few local profiteers.
An Approval of the Sale of Shell’s and Total’s Assets Would Be a Declaration of War with the Niger Delta
We want to make it absolutely clear: approving Shell’s or TotalEnergies’ divestment in its current form without addressing the profound environmental and social costs would be a grave injustice to the people of the Niger Delta and could lead to significant unrest in the region. It would be an affront to the generations of Niger Deltans who have fought and died for environmental justice, their homes, and their livelihoods.
Approving Shell’s SPDC share sale would send a dangerous message to all multinational corporations operating in Nigeria that they can extract our resources, leave devastation behind, and walk away without consequence. This is not just a question of corporate accountability; it is about Nigeria’s sovereignty, dignity, and the right of its people to live in a clean and safe environment.
They demanded that President Tinubu: “Immediately halt all divestment processes until a transparent, comprehensive, and inclusive review is undertaken that addresses Shell’s and TotalEnergies’ historical environmental and social liabilities.
“Ensure inclusive and transparent consultation with state governments and the people of the sites of oil and gas extraction in the Niger Delta before any further divestment of IOC assets.
“Hold Shell, TotalEnergies, and all other IOCs accountable for their past and ongoing environmental damage, and ensure they fund a full cleanup and remediation program across the Niger Delta.
“Uphold the regulatory independence of NUPRC and allow it to fulfill its statutory duties without political interference.
“Respect the resolution of the National Assembly, which has called for a halt to all divestments by international oil companies in Nigeria.
“Ensure that new operators are properly vetted and committed to responsible environmental management and community welfare.
“Create an Environmental Restoration Fund that is sufficiently funded to meet the full and complete costs of environmental cleanup and reparations based on credible estimates of independent international experts and contributed to by Shell, TotalEnergies, and other international oil companies and future operators to address the long-term damage caused by their operations.
“Provide community profit-sharing opportunities for host communities as part of any divestment agreement, ensuring that the local people benefit from the oil resources they have hosted for decades.
“Mandate full disclosure of all environmental liabilities before divestment, requiring Shell, TotalEnergies, and any future operators to publicly declare and address all damages.
“Include gas flaring cessation and decommissioning plans in any divestment agreement, with clear timelines for ending harmful practices.
“Account for carbon emissions related to the divested assets and propose mitigation plans that align with Nigeria’s climate commitments.”
They stated that: “This is a defining moment in Nigeria. We urge President Tinubu to stand with the people of the Niger Delta and uphold the values of justice, fairness, and environmental protection. By halting Shell’s, TotalEnergies’ and any other IOC divestment and demanding accountability,
“President Tinubu will send a powerful message that Nigeria’s sovereignty and the welfare of its citizens are paramount.
We ask President Tinubu not to undermine Nigeria’s national interest and the oversight of democratic institutions. We stand ready to continue our advocacy but need President Tinubu to show leadership to ensure a just, sustainable, and prosperous future for all Nigerians.”
Tinubu Asked to Stop Shell from Selling Remaining Shares
National News
Tinubu commends Buni over successful primaries in Yobe
Tinubu commends Buni over successful primaries in Yobe
By: Yahaya Wakili
The President of the Federal Republic of Nigeria, President Ahmed Bola Tinubu GCFR, has commended Governor Mai Mala Buni CON of Yobe State and other stakeholders of the party for the successful primary election that produced Alhaji Baba Mallam Wali MNI as the party’s governorship candidate.
The President gave the commendation when he received Governor Buni and the APC gubernatorial candidate, Alhaji Baba Mallam Wali, MNI, at Aso Villa, Abuja.
President Tinubu expressed appreciation for the healthy political developments in Yobe State ahead of the forthcoming general elections.
The President described Governor Mai Mala Buni, CON, as a political strategist with invaluable strategies that have consistently contributed to the success of the All Progressives Congress (APC) and remain a worthy treasure for the party.
According to the president, “With Governor Buni at the helm of affairs, I have no doubt that Yobe State will always be delivered to the party.
“Yobe State is blessed to have a seasoned bureaucrat with a huge wealth of experience who has consistently been part of the system as the governorship candidate of the party,” President Tinubu said.
He said, “I am sure you will bring your wealth of experience to continue with the legacies of the Buni administration to add to the achievements in education, healthcare, road infrastructure, agriculture empowerment, and the rest,” President Tinubu told Baba Mallam Wali.
Governor Mai Mala Buni further described the candidate as fully prepared for the job and noted that he has been part of the system for a long time, and it will be continuity without wasting time.
He expressed the appreciation of the government and people of Yobe State for the support extended by the Tinubu-led federal government to the state to improve the lives of the people.
Tinubu commends Buni over successful primaries in Yobe
National News
Over 90% of Nigeria’s Inmates are State Offenders, Between 30-50% Shouldn’t Have Been Jailed – Tunji-Ojo
Over 90% of Nigeria’s Inmates are State Offenders, Between 30-50% Shouldn’t Have Been Jailed – Tunji-Ojo
Reveals How FG freed over 4,000 inmates in one day, cut recidivism from 13,000 to 1,000
By: Michael Mike
The Federal Government has disclosed that 93 per cent of inmates in Nigeria’s custodial facilities are being held for state offences, with only seven per cent facing federal offences, even as it revealed that between 30 and 50 per cent of inmates may be serving time for offences that do not warrant imprisonment.
The Minister of Interior, Dr Olubunmi Tunji-Ojo, made the disclosure on Wednesday in Abuja at the Regional Conference on the Classification of Prisoners and the Use of Technology in Prisons in Africa.
The conference was jointly organised by the United Nations Office on Drugs and Crime (UNODC) and the African Correctional Services Association (ACSA).
Tunji-Ojo said the figures had exposed the need for a fundamental rethink of the way Nigeria and other African countries classify offenders and deploy imprisonment as a response to crime.
“93% of our inmates in Nigeria are state offenders. Only 7% are federal offenders. And of this 93%, I want to tell you before this president came on board, a lot of them were for minor offences that had no need for incarceration,” the minister said.
He said the Federal Government, upon his assumption of office, undertook an audit of inmates incarcerated over minor fines and compensation orders, a process that resulted in the release of more than 4,000 inmates.
“When I became minister, I called my permanent secretary, I called the Controller General of the Correctional Service, and I said, listen, give me the data, the record of people who are in correctional centres for fines and compensation of less than 500,000 or something. And guess what? Over 4,000 people,” he said.
According to the minister, the continued detention of such inmates was economically irrational, as the government spent far more feeding and maintaining them than the value of the fines or compensation involved.
“I said, what is the sense in this? Because I feed them in a year with more than 10 times of the fine. So how is the government benefiting?” he asked.
Tunji-Ojo said the government subsequently cleared the affected cases, resulting in the decongestion of correctional facilities by five per cent in a single day.
“And we were able to clear that, and in one day, we decongested our correctional centre by 5% in one day. In one day,” he said.
The minister said the experience raised a broader question about the rationale behind overcrowding in correctional facilities, insisting that the number of inmates alone should not be the only measure of the crisis.
“The question is this. Is your correctional centre rightfully overcrowded? That is the question. You have to look at those particular offences. You will realise that more than 30, 40, 50 percent are offences that do not warrant incarceration,” he said.
The disclosure comes against the background of Nigeria’s long-running prison congestion crisis. Correctional facilities across the country have for years struggled with overcrowding, placing enormous pressure on feeding, healthcare, security, rehabilitation and other essential services.
A significant proportion of the inmate population comprises persons awaiting trial. In many cases, detainees spend prolonged periods in custody before their cases are concluded, with some eventually discharged for lack of evidence or after spending periods in detention that exceed the sentences they might have received if convicted.
The situation has fuelled concerns over access to justice, the presumption of innocence and the impact of poverty on the criminal justice system, particularly where suspects are unable to meet bail conditions or secure effective legal representation.
The minister’s position suggests that the problem cannot be solved simply by constructing more prisons. Rather, it requires a more rigorous classification of inmates, faster trials and greater use of non-custodial measures for minor and non-violent offences.
Beyond decongestion, Tunji-Ojo said the Federal Government had also recorded significant progress in reducing recidivism through education, skills acquisition and rehabilitation.
He disclosed that the number of inmates returning to crime had fallen sharply from about 13,000 cases annually in 2023 to approximately 1,000 last year.
The minister attributed the improvement to increased access to education and vocational training within correctional facilities.
He said 62 inmates were currently pursuing postgraduate studies, while 261 were enrolled in undergraduate programmes. Another 1,125 inmates were participating in formal education.
He further disclosed that 18 National Open University of Nigeria centres had been established within correctional facilities, while 9,582 inmates were enrolled in vocational and non-formal rehabilitation programmes.
The figures, he said, reflected a deliberate shift in the philosophy of corrections from mere confinement to rehabilitation and reintegration.
Tunji-Ojo also said Nigeria had gone three consecutive years without recording a jailbreak or an attack on a correctional facility, attributing the achievement partly to improved data management and information sharing among security agencies.
He cited the case of an escaped inmate who was rearrested after attempting to obtain a Nigerian passport.
According to him, the inmate’s biometric information triggered an alert when he approached the Nigeria Immigration Service.
“Immediately he put his finger at the level of Nigeria Immigration Service to procure a passport. Immigration saw it immediately that he was an inmate. And immediately they reached out to Correctional Service and he was arrested right there,” the minister said.
He said the incident demonstrated the importance of integrating technology and biometric data across government agencies in strengthening national security and improving correctional administration.
The Controller-General of the Nigerian Correctional Service, Sylvester Nwakuche, said the country had continued to modernise its correctional system through reforms anchored on the Nigerian Correctional Service Act, 2019.
Nwakuche said the classification of inmates had become a strategic instrument for identifying risks, protecting vulnerable prisoners, deploying resources efficiently and delivering rehabilitation programmes tailored to the needs of individual inmates.
He said the proper classification of prisoners was essential to ensuring that inmates were not managed as a homogenous group, stressing that the risks, needs and rehabilitation requirements of a convicted violent offender could not be treated in the same manner as those of a low-risk or vulnerable inmate.
The Controller-General also said the integration of technology into correctional administration would improve record management, strengthen information sharing and enhance institutional accountability.
He noted that correctional institutions across Africa faced complex security and rehabilitation challenges that could not be solved by any single institution acting alone.
“No single correctional service possesses all the solutions to today’s security and rehabilitation challenges,” Nwakuche said.
He added: “We have a unique opportunity to exchange ideas, share practical experiences and collectively develop solutions that will strengthen correctional systems across Africa.”
The Abuja conference therefore provided a platform for African correctional authorities and international partners to examine how prisoner classification and technology could be deployed to improve prison management, enhance security and promote rehabilitation.
For Nigeria, the discussions are particularly significant as the country continues to confront the challenge of overcrowded custodial centres and a criminal justice system in which many suspects remain in detention for extended periods before trial.
The latest figures have also brought renewed attention to the relationship between federal and state justice systems. Although the Nigerian Correctional Service is a federal institution, the minister said 93 per cent of inmates were being held for state offences.
This means that the Federal Government is responsible for the custody, feeding, healthcare and rehabilitation of a large population of inmates whose alleged offences fall under state jurisdiction.
The revelation is likely to intensify calls for states to take greater responsibility for the administration of criminal justice, particularly by strengthening their courts, improving prosecution, expanding legal aid and ensuring that minor offenders are not unnecessarily committed to custodial facilities.
Legal and human rights advocates have long argued that the nation’s prison congestion crisis is not simply a problem of inadequate infrastructure. They maintain that unnecessary arrests, prolonged investigations, delayed trials, inability to meet bail conditions and the overuse of imprisonment for minor offences are major drivers of overcrowding.
The Federal Government’s experience of releasing more than 4,000 inmates in a single day over fines and compensation orders of less than about N500,000 has now provided a stark illustration of the problem.
The development also highlights the economic cost of unnecessary incarceration. As Tunji-Ojo pointed out, the cost of feeding and maintaining an inmate for a year could be many times higher than the fine or compensation that led to the person’s imprisonment in the first place.
The challenge before Nigeria, therefore, is to ensure that imprisonment is used for offenders whose incarceration is necessary to protect society, while non-custodial alternatives are deployed for minor offences and low-risk offenders.
The minister’s disclosure has consequently transformed the debate over prison congestion from a question of how many more custodial facilities Nigeria needs to a more fundamental question: how many people should be in prison in the first place?
With 93 per cent of inmates reportedly held for state offences, between 30 and 50 per cent allegedly serving sentences for offences that may not warrant incarceration, more than 4,000 inmates freed in one day and recidivism reportedly falling from about 13,000 to 1,000 cases annually, the Federal Government says the future of Nigeria’s correctional system must lie in smarter classification, technology-driven administration, rehabilitation and a justice system that reserves imprisonment for those who truly need to be behind bars.
Over 90% of Nigeria’s Inmates are State Offenders, Between 30-50% Shouldn’t Have Been Jailed – Tunji-Ojo
National News
Judge Weighs Recusal in IGP Contempt Case Over Missing Man as Police Stay Away
Judge Weighs Recusal in IGP Contempt Case Over Missing Man as Police Stay Away
By: Michael Mike
Justice Binta Nyako of the Federal High Court in Abuja has deferred a decision on whether to continue presiding over contempt proceedings against the Inspector-General of Police (IGP), saying she is considering stepping aside because of her deep involvement in the case.
The contempt proceedings arise from allegations that the IGP failed to obey subsisting court orders directing the police to produce officers implicated in the disappearance of John Anozie and to present several case files linked to the matter. The court had also awarded N2 million in damages to Mr. Anozie’s wife, Nnenna Anozie.
At Monday’s proceedings, the IGP was not represented in court.
When the matter was called, counsel to Mrs. Anozie, Vincent Adodo, told the court that the applicant was ready to proceed with the application seeking to commit the IGP for contempt over the alleged non-compliance with the court’s orders.
Before the application could be argued, Justice Nyako disclosed that she had reflected extensively on the case and was contemplating transferring the contempt proceedings to another judge.
“I have been thinking about this matter, and I am of the opinion that I should send this case to one of my brother judges to take the contempt proceedings,” the judge said.
“I feel I have been so involved in the matter.”
However, Adodo urged the court to retain the case, stating that his client had confidence in the judge’s continued handling of the proceedings.
“We are comfortable with you handling the case, My Lord,” he said.
Justice Nyako said she would take one week to decide whether to continue hearing the contempt application or assign it to another judge.
The proceedings also revealed what appears to be a breakthrough in efforts to recover one of the missing police case files central to the dispute.
Adodo informed the court that the file had been located and temporarily released to his legal team for photocopying before it was returned to the respondents over two weeks ago.
“They have found the case file,” he said, adding that the only outstanding step was for the authorities to certify the document.
“The only thing they need to do is just to certify it,” he told the court.
Reacting, Justice Nyako remarked: “At least something is happening.”
Background
The case stems from the alleged abduction of John Anozie by operatives of the now-disbanded Special Anti-Robbery Squad (SARS) in Lagos in June 2017. His whereabouts have remained unknown since the incident, making the case one of the unresolved allegations of enforced disappearance linked to the former police unit.
The suit has become a test of police accountability and compliance with judicial orders. The pending contempt proceedings seek to determine whether the IGP should be sanctioned for allegedly failing to obey the court’s directives, with Justice Nyako expected next week to decide whether she will continue hearing the matter or transfer it to another judge.
Judge Weighs Recusal in IGP Contempt Case Over Missing Man as Police Stay Away
-
News2 years agoRoger Federer’s Shock as DNA Results Reveal Myla and Charlene Are Not His Biological Children
-
Opinions4 years agoTHE PLIGHT OF FARIDA
-
News1 year agoFAILED COUP IN BURKINA FASO: HOW TRAORÉ NARROWLY ESCAPED ASSASSINATION PLOT AMID FOREIGN INTERFERENCE CLAIMS
-
News2 years agoEYN: Rev. Billi, Distortion of History, and The Living Tamarind Tree
-
Opinions5 years agoPOLICE CHARGE ROOMS, A MINTING PRESS
-
ACADEMICS2 years agoA History of Biu” (2015) and The Lingering Bura-Pabir Question (1)
-
Columns2 years agoArmy University Biu: There is certain interest, but certainly not from Borno.
-
Politics1 year ago2027: Why Hon. Midala Balami Must Go, as Youths in Hawul and Asikira/Uba Federal Constituency Reject ₦500,000 as Sallah Gift
