National News
Tinubu Asked to Stop Shell from Selling Remaining Shares
Tinubu Asked to Stop Shell from Selling Remaining Shares
By: Michael Mike
A conglomerate of Civil Society Organisations, community leaders, and concerned citizens have called on President Bola Tinubu to sustain the Nigeria Upstream Petroleum Regulatory Commission’s (NUPRC) rejection of Shell’s request to sell its remaining shares in the Shell Petroleum Development Company (SPDC) to the Renaissance consortium.
The group while alleging that other international oil corporations, such as TotalEnergies, are also attempting to sell their stakes in SPDC and other Nigerian onshore oil assets, stated that any approval of Shell’s and Total’s requests would weaken regulatory independence, ignore the interests of the Niger Delta communities, jeopardize the environmental and social well-being of the region for generations to come, and undermine Nigeria’s sovereignty.
Signatories to the request are Nnimmo Bassey (Health of Mother Earth Foundation (HOMEF)), Dr. Isaac ‘Asume’ Osuoka (Social Action Nigeria), Olanrewaju Suraju (HEDA Resource Centre), Emem Okon (Kebetkache Women Development and Resource Centre),
Akinbode Oluwafemi (Corporate Accountability and Public Participation Africa (CAPPA)), Idoreyin Bassey (League of Queens International Empowerment),
Tijah Bolton-Akpan (Policy Alert), Ken Henshaw (We the People), Rita Uwaka (Environmental Rights Action/Friends of the Earth Nigeria), David Ugolor (Africa Network for Environment and Economic Justice (ANEEJ)) Mfon Utin (Healthy Life Development initiative), Comr. Cynthia Buluebiere Bright (Gbolekekro Women Empowerment And Development Organization (GWEDO)), Auwal Musa Rafsanjani (Civil Society Legislative Advocacy Centre (CISLAC)), Cookey Tammy (Centre for Environment, Human Rights and Development (CEHRD)), Umo Isua-Ikoh (Peace Point Development Foundation),
Friday Nbani (Lekeh Development Foundation)
Others are Amanie Stella (Society for Women and Youths Affairs (SWAYA)), Martha Agbani (Lokiaka Community Development Centre), Akpobari Celestine (People’s Advancement Centre
Ogoni Solidarity Forum), Chido Onumah (Africa Centre for Media and Information Literacy (AFRICMIL)), Ibrahim Zikirullahi (Resource Centre for Human Rights & Civic Education (CHRICED)), Odey Friday (Accountability Lab International Peace and Civic Responsibility Centre (IPCRC)), Arochukwu Ogbonna (Civil Rights Council) and Josesphine Alabi (Keen and Care Initiative)
The group stated that: “We are, again, compelled to ask for a comprehensive halt to all divestment requests from oil corporations in the Niger Delta, including Shell, Total, and other IOCs with similar plans, until the issues of concerned are addressed.”
Among the issues include: It is critical to emphasize that the Nigerian Petroleum Industry Act (PIA) and the NUPRC’s responsibility to uphold this law were clearly outlined when Shell’s divestment request was initially rejected. NUPRC’s refusal was based on legitimate concerns, including Shell’s failure to adequately address the significant environmental and social liabilities associated with its operations in the Niger Delta, as was independently assessed and recommended by international assessors contracted by the country. Among the reasons for rejecting the sale, NUPRC cited the inability of the Renaissance consortium, a shady company with links to past Shell executives and Nigerian political actors, to demonstrate its financial and technical capacities to manage the assets and the pressing need for proper environmental remediation.
NUPRC’s rejection was in line with the responsibilities outlined under Nigerian law and global best practices for corporate accountability. It is a decision rooted in national interest — protecting the health, safety, and environment of the Niger Delta communities. Any attempt to approve Shell’s sale despite these valid concerns would risk undermining regulatory independence and signaling that Nigerian law can be bypassed to serve the interests of multinational corporations.
The Legacy of Pollution and Health Crisis
The environmental and health crises caused by Shell and other oil corporations operating in the Niger Delta are well documented. The United Nations Environment Programme’s (UNEP) report on Ogoniland describes an ecological disaster of immense proportions. UNEP’s findings revealed that:
- Drinking water sources are contaminated with dangerous levels of hydrocarbons, making them unsafe for human consumption.
- Oil spills have destroyed entire ecosystems, killing marine life and damaging the biodiversity that is crucial for the livelihood of local communities.
- The soil in Ogoniland has been contaminated with toxic substances, rendering it infertile and unsuitable for farming, exacerbating food insecurity in the region.
UNEP’s assessment concluded that the cost of remediating the “environmental catastrophe” in Ogoniland alone would exceed $1 billion over the initial five years, with the cleanup expected to last more than 30 years. Yet, these costs are still insufficient to cover the broader environmental impacts of oil extraction across the Niger Delta, where similar damages exist.
The Bayelsa State Oil and Environment Commission’s (BSOEC) report provides a detailed analysis of the severe pollution caused by Shell’s and other multinational companies’ operations, including health impacts on local populations. According to the BSOEC: - High levels of toxins from oil pollution, such as total petroleum hydrocarbons (TPHs) and heavy metals (HMs), have infiltrated the air, water, and soil across the region, contributing to a public health emergency.
- Communities are suffering from respiratory issues, skin diseases, and cancers linked to oil pollution, and these problems are worsening by the year.
- The economic cost of these health impacts and the degradation of natural resources is incalculable, leaving most of the people in poverty and unable to sustain themselves through traditional means like farming and fishing.
The BSOEC report also estimates that the cost of remediating the damage in Bayelsa State alone would exceed $12 billion over 12 years. Based on the UNEP and BSOEC reports, it would take about $100 billion to address the environmental damage in the entire Niger Delta comprehensively. Following the Deepwater Horizon oil spill in the United States, BP, the company responsible, paid over $60 billion to address the impacts of one oil spill incident alone. The environmental damage of the Niger Delta is much worse and has spanned decades. Therefore, to allow Shell, TotalEnergies, or any other company to walk away from their responsibilities would mean transferring these liabilities to the Nigerian state, the Niger Delta states, and the Nigerian people. This is an unjust and unsustainable burden that would further exacerbate the challenges faced by communities already suffering from the effects of pollution and environmental neglect.
Dangerous Lessons from Past Asset Sales
The experiences from past asset sales by Shell, ENI/AGIP, and ExxonMobil offer grave lessons. In the case of Shell’s divestment in Nembe to Aiteo, for instance, the local communities were left with unresolved pollution and no proper remedy for the environmental damage caused by decades of oil extraction. Environmental destruction has worsened in the area. Similarly, when ExxonMobil divested some of its assets, the responsibility for remediation was inadequately transferred to new operators, who were ill-prepared to manage the legacy of contamination. In ENI/AGIP’s case, the sale of assets to Oando continued to worsen the situation in the host communities as there were no comprehensive cleanup efforts undertaken.
These sales not only failed to address the critical environmental liabilities but also deepened the social tensions in the Niger Delta, as new operators took over without addressing the root causes of community unrest or the longstanding health and environmental challenges. This pattern of irresponsible divestment must not be repeated, and the Nigerian government has a responsibility to stop it.
The National Interest and the Urgency for Action
We ask Mr. President to ensure that the immediate financial interests of a few multinational corporations and local profiteers do not outweigh the health, future, and survival of millions of Nigerians who have suffered for decades. President Tinubu must safeguard the future of Nigeria, ensuring that all its people, especially those in the Niger Delta, are not sacrificed for the benefit of global capital and a few local profiteers.
An Approval of the Sale of Shell’s and Total’s Assets Would Be a Declaration of War with the Niger Delta
We want to make it absolutely clear: approving Shell’s or TotalEnergies’ divestment in its current form without addressing the profound environmental and social costs would be a grave injustice to the people of the Niger Delta and could lead to significant unrest in the region. It would be an affront to the generations of Niger Deltans who have fought and died for environmental justice, their homes, and their livelihoods.
Approving Shell’s SPDC share sale would send a dangerous message to all multinational corporations operating in Nigeria that they can extract our resources, leave devastation behind, and walk away without consequence. This is not just a question of corporate accountability; it is about Nigeria’s sovereignty, dignity, and the right of its people to live in a clean and safe environment.
They demanded that President Tinubu: “Immediately halt all divestment processes until a transparent, comprehensive, and inclusive review is undertaken that addresses Shell’s and TotalEnergies’ historical environmental and social liabilities.
“Ensure inclusive and transparent consultation with state governments and the people of the sites of oil and gas extraction in the Niger Delta before any further divestment of IOC assets.
“Hold Shell, TotalEnergies, and all other IOCs accountable for their past and ongoing environmental damage, and ensure they fund a full cleanup and remediation program across the Niger Delta.
“Uphold the regulatory independence of NUPRC and allow it to fulfill its statutory duties without political interference.
“Respect the resolution of the National Assembly, which has called for a halt to all divestments by international oil companies in Nigeria.
“Ensure that new operators are properly vetted and committed to responsible environmental management and community welfare.
“Create an Environmental Restoration Fund that is sufficiently funded to meet the full and complete costs of environmental cleanup and reparations based on credible estimates of independent international experts and contributed to by Shell, TotalEnergies, and other international oil companies and future operators to address the long-term damage caused by their operations.
“Provide community profit-sharing opportunities for host communities as part of any divestment agreement, ensuring that the local people benefit from the oil resources they have hosted for decades.
“Mandate full disclosure of all environmental liabilities before divestment, requiring Shell, TotalEnergies, and any future operators to publicly declare and address all damages.
“Include gas flaring cessation and decommissioning plans in any divestment agreement, with clear timelines for ending harmful practices.
“Account for carbon emissions related to the divested assets and propose mitigation plans that align with Nigeria’s climate commitments.”
They stated that: “This is a defining moment in Nigeria. We urge President Tinubu to stand with the people of the Niger Delta and uphold the values of justice, fairness, and environmental protection. By halting Shell’s, TotalEnergies’ and any other IOC divestment and demanding accountability,
“President Tinubu will send a powerful message that Nigeria’s sovereignty and the welfare of its citizens are paramount.
We ask President Tinubu not to undermine Nigeria’s national interest and the oversight of democratic institutions. We stand ready to continue our advocacy but need President Tinubu to show leadership to ensure a just, sustainable, and prosperous future for all Nigerians.”
Tinubu Asked to Stop Shell from Selling Remaining Shares
National News
EbonyLife Place Opens in London, Deepens UK-Nigeria Creative Ties
EbonyLife Place Opens in London, Deepens UK-Nigeria Creative Ties
EbonyLife Place, a new cultural and entertainment destination dedicated to African and Black creativity, has opened in London, in a development expected to further strengthen creative, trade and investment ties between Nigeria and the United Kingdom.
The venue, created by Nigerian media entrepreneur and EbonyLife Group Founder and Chief Executive Officer, Mo Abudu, officially opened on Thursday and is located at 208 Wandsworth Road, between Battersea Power Station and Nine Elms.
The opening is being positioned as a significant milestone in UK-Nigeria creative collaboration and is expected to create about 40 direct jobs in London.
It also aligns with the ongoing UK-Nigeria Economic, Trade and Investment Partnership (ETIP), which seeks to deepen economic cooperation between both countries, including through stronger links in the creative industries.
EbonyLife Place London brings film, food, fashion, art, music and entertainment together under one roof, providing a platform for established and emerging creative talents from Africa and the wider Black diaspora.
At the centre of the new destination is the 160-seat Amani Auditorium, described as the UK’s only cinema dedicated exclusively to African and Black film.
The auditorium will showcase Nollywood and other African films alongside productions from the UK, Caribbean, United States and other parts of the global Black diaspora.
Beyond cinema, the auditorium will host masterclasses, industry panels, fireside conversations, keynote sessions, live acoustic performances as well as cultural and business events.
Speaking on the development, Abudu said the new venue was designed to bring the richness of African and Black creativity together through films, food, fashion, art, music and stories.
She said the vision extended beyond Nigeria to Africa and the global Black diaspora, adding that the venue would provide a platform for creators from cities including Lagos, London, Accra, Kingston and New York.
The Mayor of London, Sadiq Khan, welcomed the development, describing EbonyLife Place London as a “fantastic addition” to the city’s cultural offering.
Khan said the venue would showcase films by African and Black filmmakers alongside music, art, fashion and food, describing it as a destination for celebrating Black creativity from around the world.
The Mayor had visited EbonyLife Place in Lagos last year during his trade mission to Africa, where he and Abudu hosted a London edition of Lagos Canvas, bringing together figures from Lagos’ art and entertainment industries to promote creative links and partnerships.
Lagos State Governor, Babajide Sanwo-Olu, also welcomed the London expansion, describing it as an international extension of a vision that originated in Lagos.
“EbonyLife Place was born in Lagos in 2019, and it is wonderful to see this proudly Lagosian vision now taking its place in London,” Sanwo-Olu said.
He described the London venue as more than a new cultural destination, saying it represented a celebration of African creativity, culture and storytelling and a bridge between Lagos and the rest of the world.
The London destination also features The Afrobeat, a 40-seat restaurant offering contemporary African cuisine; Fèhìntì Lounge; Maji Concession and Bar; Zuri Retail, an African concept store; and the Living Wall Gallery for contemporary African and diaspora art and photography.
Music will also feature prominently in its programme, with live performances, listening parties and curated experiences involving established African and diaspora artistes as well as emerging musicians, DJs and new sounds.
The venue’s opening programme includes a partnership with Film Africa, described as the UK’s largest annual festival celebrating African cinema.
According to the organisers, EbonyLife Place will operate a year-round programme of screenings, performances, exhibitions, conversations, networking events, showcases and collaborations involving African and Black creative communities.
A membership scheme is also expected to be introduced, although details of the various membership tiers will be announced later.
The opening marks another stage in Abudu’s long-standing effort to build international platforms for African storytelling and creative talent.
EbonyLife was established as an African media brand and has subsequently developed partnerships with major international entertainment organisations, including Netflix, Sony Pictures and BBC Studios.
Abudu has also received international recognition, including being named among TIME magazine’s 100 Most Influential People in the World and Forbes’ 100 Most Powerful Women.
The establishment of EbonyLife Place in London therefore extends an existing Lagos-based creative brand into one of the world’s major cultural and entertainment markets.
The development also comes as Nigeria and the UK continue efforts to expand economic cooperation beyond traditional sectors, with the creative economy increasingly viewed as an area capable of generating jobs, investment and international opportunities for Nigerian talent.
With its focus on Nigerian, African and Black stories and creators, EbonyLife Place London is expected to provide another platform through which Nigerian creative products can reach international audiences while strengthening links between the country’s creative industry and the wider global market.
EbonyLife Place Opens in London, Deepens UK-Nigeria Creative Ties
National News
UNESCO, FG Seek Ethical Framework for Neurotechnology in Nigeria
UNESCO, FG Seek Ethical Framework for Neurotechnology in Nigeria
By: Michael Mike
The United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organisation (UNESCO), the Federal Government and the scientific community have called for the development of an ethical and regulatory framework to guide the responsible development and application of neurotechnology in Nigeria.
The call was made on Wednesday in Abuja at a two-day stakeholders’ roundtable on the ethics of neurotechnology, where experts warned that rapid advances in technologies capable of interacting with the human nervous system could create profound challenges for human dignity, privacy, autonomy and fundamental rights.
Speaking at the event, UNESCO Representative to Nigeria, Dr. Isaias Barreto da Rosa, said neurotechnology was opening extraordinary possibilities in healthcare, rehabilitation, education and inclusion, but warned that the closer technology came to the human brain, the more fundamental the ethical questions became.
He said neurotechnology could improve understanding of the brain, enhance diagnosis and treatment, support rehabilitation and enable people living with disabilities to communicate and live more independently.
However, Barreto da Rosa said neurodata could be among the most sensitive forms of personal information, raising questions about who controls such data, how meaningful consent could be guaranteed, and how mental privacy, autonomy and freedom of thought could be protected.
He also warned against the possibility of neurotechnology widening existing inequalities rather than reducing them.
“These questions cannot be addressed after the technology has already transformed our societies. Ethics must evolve alongside innovation, not struggle to catch up with it,” he said.
The UNESCO representative recalled that the organisation’s member states adopted the Recommendation on the Ethics of Neurotechnology in November 2025, describing it as the first global normative framework dedicated to the field.
He said the recommendation built on UNESCO’s longstanding work on bioethics, science and emerging technologies, including its Recommendation on the Ethics of Artificial Intelligence.
According to him, the central principle was that scientific progress must remain at the service of humanity, human rights and the common good.
Barreto da Rosa noted that Nigeria had already contributed to the international process that produced the recommendation, with Nigerian experts and the Neuroscience Society of Nigeria participating in consultations that helped shape the global framework.
He said the task before Nigerian stakeholders was to translate the global principles into national reflection, policies and action.
“For Nigeria, this is also a question of opportunity,” he said, noting that the country’s universities, research institutions, medical community, technology ecosystem and young innovators had the capacity not only to participate in the future of neurotechnology but also to help shape its governance in Africa.
He urged stakeholders to examine who benefits from neurotechnology, who bears its risks, who has access to it, whose rights must be protected and who should be accountable when things go wrong.
The National Project Focal Point in the Federal Ministry of Innovation, Science and Technology, Dr. Adebayo Adeyemi, said the Federal Government considered the consultation timely, given the opportunities and risks associated with neurotechnology.
Adeyemi, who conveyed the goodwill of the Minister of Innovation, Science and Technology, Dr. Kingsley Udeh, said the minister was passionate about the initiative and welcomed the appointment of a national project focal point.
He said the UNESCO recommendation adopted in November 2025 provided clear boundaries and safeguards for the use, application and promotion of neurotechnology globally.
According to him, the immediate task was to interpret those recommendations within the Nigerian context.
“What is expected from this two-day meeting is that we are to be able to put those recommendations in a perspective that represents Nigeria, a perspective that will be able to speak to our realities,” he said.
Adeyemi said developing a Nigerian perspective would make it easier to formulate relevant policies and enforce regulations capable of responding to the country’s specific circumstances.
He also described the consultation as an opportunity for Nigeria to assume a leadership role in contributing to the global framework on neurotechnology.
He urged participants to bring their expertise and diverse professional experiences to the deliberations to produce practical outcomes applicable to Nigeria and Africa.
The President of the Neuroscience Society of Nigeria, Prof. Angela Danborno, said the ethical debate had become more urgent as advances in neuroscience and technology were transforming understanding of the human brain and opening new possibilities for diagnosis, treatment, rehabilitation, education and human-machine interaction.
Danborno identified brain-computer interfaces, neuroimaging, artificial intelligence, neuromodulation and other emerging neurotechnologies as areas with enormous potential to improve human health and wellbeing.
She noted that the importance of the subject was reflected in the theme of the society’s 2026 conference, “Neuroeducation and Neurotechnology.”
However, she said the benefits of emerging technologies must be weighed against their potential implications for individual rights and freedoms.
“Who owns and controls neural data? Who has the right to access information about a person’s brain? How do we protect mental privacy and cognitive liberty? How do we ensure informed consent when technologies become increasingly complex?” she asked.
Danborno stressed that the questions were not theoretical but required immediate consideration as neurotechnology continued to advance globally and found greater application in Nigerian society.
She particularly drew attention to optogenetics, an emerging neurotechnology involving the precise investigation and modulation of neural circuits.
According to her, the technology’s potential to manipulate specific neural circuits raised ethical questions around autonomy, informed consent, safety, genetic modification, identity, privacy and the possibility of altering behaviour or cognition.
Danborno said these concerns made emerging technologies particularly relevant to discussions on ethics and governance.
She called for Nigeria’s approach to be grounded in its unique social, cultural, economic and healthcare realities.
“For Nigeria, the conversation must also be grounded in our unique social, cultural, economic, and health-care system,” she said.
The neuroscientist stressed that scientific progress and ethical responsibility must advance together, warning that innovation should not come at the expense of human dignity, autonomy, privacy, justice and fundamental human rights.
Also speaking, a representative of the Federal Ministry of Health, Ado Danladi, said the ministry was particularly interested in the initiative because of the health benefits and ethical concerns associated with neurotechnology.
Danladi, who conveyed the greetings of the Minister of Health, the Permanent Secretary of the Federal Ministry of Health and Social Welfare, and the Director of Planning, Research and Statistics, said neurotechnology could play an important role in addressing a range of health conditions.
He cited Parkinson’s disease among organic conditions that could benefit from neurotechnology, while also noting its potential application in addressing conditions such as anxiety and depression.
However, he said the growing availability of neurotechnological devices and applications had raised important questions about the ethical implications of their use, particularly where they generated sensitive neurodata.
“How should this data be protected? Who uses this data? To what benefit, and all that?” he asked.
Danladi said the questions were particularly important as Nigeria sought to establish appropriate safeguards for the use of emerging neurotechnologies.
He described the UNESCO initiative as a pioneering effort and said Nigeria had an opportunity to position itself among countries taking the lead in protecting human dignity and maintaining ethical standards in scientific research.
He assured that the Federal Ministry of Health would align with UNESCO on the initiative to ensure that Nigeria was properly positioned to contribute to the emerging global governance of neurotechnology.
Danladi said the ministry would support efforts to promote ethical standards in research and the responsible application of neurotechnology in healthcare.
He urged participants to use the two-day consultation to develop recommendations capable of guiding Nigeria’s response to the opportunities and risks presented by the rapidly evolving field.
Barreto da Rosa, meanwhile, urged scientists, policymakers, medical professionals and innovators to go beyond asking whether a technological possibility existed.
He challenged them to also ask whether it should be done, under what conditions and for whose benefit.
He said the measure of scientific progress was not only what humanity could discover but how wisely and fairly such discoveries were applied.
UNESCO, he assured, would continue working with Nigeria to advance ethical governance, scientific capacity, inclusive innovation and international cooperation as neurotechnology continues to evolve.
UNESCO, FG Seek Ethical Framework for Neurotechnology in Nigeria
National News
FG Declares October 1 Public Holiday as Nigeria Mark’s 66th Independence Anniversary
FG Declares October 1 Public Holiday as Nigeria Mark’s 66th Independence Anniversary
By: Michael Mike
The Federal Government has declared Thursday, October 1, 2026, a public holiday to commemorate Nigeria’s 66th Independence Anniversary.
The Minister of Interior, Dr. Olubunmi Tunji-Ojo, announced the declaration on behalf of the Federal Government in a statement issued on Wednesday by the Permanent Secretary of the Ministry, Dr. Magdalene Ajani.
The minister congratulated Nigerians at home and abroad, urging citizens to use the anniversary to reflect on the nation’s journey since independence and renew their commitment to building a more united, peaceful and prosperous country.
Tunji-Ojo emphasised the importance of peace and stability to national development, calling on Nigerians to emulate the patriotism and love for country demonstrated by the nation’s founding fathers.
He said Nigeria’s diversity remains a major strength and expressed optimism that a better and more prosperous nation is achievable through collective determination.
“As we celebrate 66 years of our independence, we should always remember that there is hope for our country and our diversity is our strength, and our collective determination remains the foundation upon which a stronger and more prosperous nation will be built,” the minister said.
The minister also reaffirmed the Federal Government’s commitment to the Renewed Hope Agenda of President Bola Ahmed Tinubu, stating that the administration would continue working towards a better Nigeria for all citizens.
He urged Nigerians to make the Independence anniversary an opportunity to demonstrate unity, patriotism, peaceful coexistence and mutual respect, while honouring the sacrifices of the country’s past heroes.
Tunji-Ojo further assured citizens that the Federal Government remains committed to strengthening national security, improving public safety and creating an environment where Nigerians can live, work and pursue their legitimate aspirations with confidence.
Nigeria gained independence from British colonial rule on October 1, 1960, and will mark its 66th Independence Anniversary on Thursday.
The minister wished Nigerians a happy 66th Independence Anniversary.
FG Declares October 1 Public Holiday as Nigeria Mark’s 66th Independence Anniversary
-
News3 years agoRoger Federer’s Shock as DNA Results Reveal Myla and Charlene Are Not His Biological Children
-
Opinions5 years agoTHE PLIGHT OF FARIDA
-
News1 year agoFAILED COUP IN BURKINA FASO: HOW TRAORÉ NARROWLY ESCAPED ASSASSINATION PLOT AMID FOREIGN INTERFERENCE CLAIMS
-
News3 years agoEYN: Rev. Billi, Distortion of History, and The Living Tamarind Tree
-
Opinions5 years agoPOLICE CHARGE ROOMS, A MINTING PRESS
-
ACADEMICS3 years agoA History of Biu” (2015) and The Lingering Bura-Pabir Question (1)
-
Columns3 years agoArmy University Biu: There is certain interest, but certainly not from Borno.
-
Politics1 year ago2027: Why Hon. Midala Balami Must Go, as Youths in Hawul and Asikira/Uba Federal Constituency Reject ₦500,000 as Sallah Gift
