Connect with us

News

We are Not at War with Niger, Nigeriens- ECOWAS

Published

on

We are Not at War with Niger, Nigeriens- ECOWAS

By: Michael Mike

The Economic Community of West African States (ECOWAS) has said the plan military action in Niger is not a war on the country or its people but to give them back the good they deserved.

Speaking at a press conference on Friday, the President of the ECOWAS Commission, Omar Alieu Touray said that the regional bloc has not taken and would never take any action against the interest of Niger.

He said: “We would like to use the opportunity to reassure the good people of Niger Republic that our major concern is for their welfare as we work assiduously to restore civilian rule and political stability in the country, and indeed in the other ECOWAS Member States currently under military rule, in the spirit of solidarity and collective security which is at the heart of our integration agenda.”

Touray lamented that: “Coup d’etat is a tragedy for our regional efforts at consolidating democracy after the political crises of the 90’s exemplified by the civil wars in Liberia and Sierra Leone. Through collective efforts of our community, the region was stabilized and the foundation for democracy and the rule of law restored.

“Indeed, until about three years ago, all leaders in the ECOWAS region were democratically elected. Unfortunately, the ill winds of coups started blowing again recently and the region has experienced three successful coups and two failed coups. The current development in the Republic of Niger adds to the list of attempted coups d’état in the region. So, you can understand why the Heads of State and Government have decided that this is one coup too many and resolved that it was time to end the contagion. The situation in the Republic of Niger is particularly unfortunate as it comes at a time the country is doing comparatively well in terms of security and economic growth.”

Justifying the decision on the planned deployment of the standby force, Touray said: “The ECOWAS security architecture, which has informed other security arrangements within and outside the region, is anchored on a number of instruments. These include the 1991 ECOWAS Declaration of Political Principles; the Revised ECOWAS Treaty of 1993, the 1999 ECOWAS Protocol relating to the Mechanism for Conflict Prevention, Management, Resolution, Peacekeeping and Security as well as the 2001 Supplementary Protocol on Democracy and Good Governance.

“The deployment of the ECOWAS Standby force is provided for in the 1999 Mechanism. Specifically, Article 25 expressly stipulates the conditions for the deployment of such a force. Among other conditions, the article provides that the force can be deployed ‘in the event of… an overthrow or an attempted overthrow of a democratically elected government.’ Furthermore, the Supplementary Act of 2012 also provides for sanctions to be invoked against members that fail to honour their obligations to ECOWAS. It also provides for the use of legitimate force in the restoration of constitutional order. Niger Republic is a signatory to all these instruments. Those who challenge the legality of the decision of ECOWAS Heads of State need to do more research.”

He explained that: “In taking its decision of 30th July and 10th August 2023, the Authority of Heads of State and government was only activating these provisions. Unfortunately, this decision has been taken out of context and repeatedly misrepresented in the media as a declaration of war against Niger Republic or a planned invasion of the country. It is even tragic that some influential persons in the Community have promoted this narrative which has been hyped in the social media as the gospel truth. These persons have conveniently ignored the strenuous efforts of the community to engage with the junta to reverse the attempted coup.”

He added that: “For the avoidance of doubt, let me state unequivocally that ECOWAS has neither declared war on the people of Niger nor is there a plan, as it is being purported, to ‘invade’ the country. The ECOWAS Authority of Heads of State and Government has only activated a full-scale application of sanctions which includes the use of legitimate force to restore constitutional order.”

He said: “In the interim, the region is employing other elements of its instruments and engaging with the military authorities as can be attested to by the several missions that have been fielded to the country and our joint efforts with our partners, including the African Union and the UN. We are hopeful that these diplomatic efforts will yield the desired outcome and make it unnecessary for the deployment of the force.”

Touray while stating that there is no specified date for the use of force to return democratic governance back to Niger, said the military option is still on the table.

He said: “Nonetheless, preparations continue towards making the force ready for deployment. Consequently, the technical arms of the decision-making organs, which include the Committee of Chiefs of Defence Staff have also been directed to prepare the community enforcement mechanism in case it becomes compelling to deploy the force.”

He however said: “We believe that even now it is not too late for the military to reconsider its action and listen to the voice of reason as the regional leaders will not condone a coup d’état. ECOWAS also wishes to remind them of their responsibility for the security and safety of President Bazoum, members of his family and government.

“At this juncture let me reiterate that the real issue is the determination of the community to halt the spiral of coups d’etat in the region. We are all brothers irrespective of the artificial borders but the rule of law has to be upheld.

“The uncontitutional action of the military has plunged the people of Niger into serious socio-economic crises. In other words, Nigeriens are suffering today because a section of the military, which should be focused on its constitutional role, decided to hijack the political institutions and subvert democracy.

“The truth is, neither Niger nor the West African sub region needs such a major distraction at this time and we would all like to see the defence and security forces of Niger Republic immediately return to their constitutional role, a role in which they have performed creditably as exemplified in their fight against terrorism and sterling performance in the Multinational Joint Tasks Force in the Lake Chad Basin Area, and in many areas within the Liptako-Gourma region.

“The decision of the Heads of State and Government to activate the clause providing for the application of legitimate force in Niger was reached only after due consideration of how political dialogue alone has unfortunately failed to deter coup plotters in the region. The precedents in Mali, Guinea and Burkina Faso are unsettling and underline the reason why the Community was obliged to take such a hard but legitimate stance, backed by the ‘ECOWAS Community law which I must stress again was subscribed to by all the Member States, including Niger Republic.

“The actions of the Community have been guided by a recognition of the Community’s obligation within the context of the spirit of solidarity and collective responsibility that underlines the ECOWAS integration arrangement. We recognize Republic of Niger as an important member of the ECOWAS family, and it remains so to date. It is not a target for destruction by ECOWAS, and ECOWAS will never allow the people of Niger to suffer in the hands of enemies within or without.

We are deeply concerned about the wellbeing of the people and the country. Historically, military administrations have not demonstrated any capacity to better deal with complex political, social and security challenges. The security situation in countries under military government have rather deteriorated, as national territories are being lost to terrorists under their administration even though this has become the main justification for their intervention.

“In most cases, the rights and freedom of the citizens are also inevitably curtailed, with arbitrary arrests, detentions, and use of excessive force becoming the order of the day. The social cohesion in these countries is weakening by the day and it will take years to restore. We do not want this in Niger Republic.

He however lamented that “fifth columnists have unfortunately been misrepresenting our decisions and actions, deriding regional authorities as being tele-guided by foreign powers with nefarious intentions. Let me remind everyone that ECOWAS is a community of rules and regulations, norms, and values.
“These principles, which have been accumulated over the 48 years of its existence, and they underpin its actions. It is undeniable that these admirable principles have made the region an exemplar among Regional Economic Communities within and outside Africa, and many look up to it for inspiration. We are therefore not under the dictate of any extra-regional power or interests. Our interest is rather the protection of the rights of our people with the objective of building a rules-based community and fostering peace and prosperity for all in our region.”

He added that: “So, while we are determined to bend over backwards to accommodate diplomatic efforts, we are not unaware of the true intentions of some of the members of the Niger junta. At first, they snubbed our diplomatic efforts but recently began to show signs of being amenable, only for them to take a dangerous path by putting in place a government, and an unacceptable transition timeline.

He said that “the decision of the ECOWAS Authority of Heads of State and Government, which is currently chaired by HE Bola Ahmed Tinubu, the President of the Federal Republic of Nigeria, is to work for the peaceful restoration of civilian rule in Niger Republic without any delay and to use all the instruments at the disposal of ECOWAS towards the attainment of this goal.

“As for the other countries in transition, namely Mali, Burkina Faso and Guinea, ECOWAS will continue to support their transition processes, as directed by
the ECOWAS Authority of Heads of State and Government. We will continue to support their fight against terrorism to ensure the restoration of democracy, peace, and security in our community. We will also continue to work with them on their agreed transition timetables.”

He said: “Regarding the mercenaries, let me say this, ECOWAS and the African continent as a whole stand against the use of private military contractors and again, we have continental instruments as against the use of private military contractors on the continent.”

We are Not at War with Niger, Nigeriens- ECOWAS

Continue Reading
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

News

Alex Birbir’s Plateau False Narrative Collapses Under the Weight of Facts

Published

on

Alex Birbir’s Plateau False Narrative Collapses Under the Weight of Facts

By: Zagazola Makama

Once again, Mr. Alex Birbir, speaking comfortably from outside Nigeria and relying heavily on emotionally charged propaganda supplied by local conflict entrepreneurs, has attempted to distort the realities of the Plateau crisis into a simplistic and dangerous narratives designed for foreign audiences unfamiliar with the actual situation on ground.

His latest podcast is not only riddled with exaggerations, contradictions and outright falsehoods, but also dangerously seeks to demonize Nigerian security forces while justifying armed Berom militia mobilisation under the deceptive banner of “self-defense.”

At the fore of Birbir’s claim is the allegation that Nigerian troops “fought alongside Fulani terrorists” against Berom youths who, according to him, merely wanted to defend their communities after attacks in Barkin Ladi.

But the actual sequence of events completely destroys this narrative. What truly happened on Wednesday, May 6, 2026, was that a large group of armed Berom youths mobilized toward the predominantly Fulani settlement of Jong following the killing of seven locals at Nding Sesut community the previous day.

Security sources confirmed that before the mobilisation, some of the youths allegedly contacted the Army commander in the area and demanded that troops “step aside” so they could carry out a retaliatory raid on Jong community.

That request was refused. Instead of abandoning their constitutional responsibility, troops of Operation Enduring Peace (OPEP) deployed to prevent the reprisal attack and stop what could have turned into a mass casualty event against innocent civilians.

That singular action is now being twisted by Birbir into “the military fighting alongside Fulani terrorists.” Think carefully about the absurdity of that argument. Since when did preventing a retaliatory raid on an entire civilian settlement become “supporting terrorists”?

If armed youths from any ethnic group mobilize toward another community carrying weapons and threatening reprisals, is the military supposed to simply fold its arms and allow bloodshed because activists overseas have already chosen their preferred victims and villains? The troops prevented a revenge attack.
And because they refused to allow armed youths to storm Jong community, propaganda merchants like Birbir became angry.

What Birbir deliberately refuses to mention is that when the armed youths arrived near Jong, shooting started from their own side and a firefight followed involving armed Fulani elements in the area. Troops were immediately alerted and swiftly intervened, dominating the general area and preventing total escalation.

Troops Operation Enduring Peace also deployed Quick Response Forces which helped stabilize the situation and prevent further reprisals. That is what professional soldiers are supposed to do. Yet in Birbir’s fictional version, stopping armed youths from invading another community somehow translates into “fighting Christians.” Even more reckless is his repeated attempt to frame the Plateau crisis as some grand “Islamic jihad” to establish a caliphate in Nigeria.

There is absolutely no evidence that Boko Haram, ISWAP or any international jihadist organization is operating inside Barkin Ladi, Riyom, Bassa or Mangu as part of a coordinated Islamic conquest.

What Plateau is suffering from is a brutal cycle of communal reprisals involving armed groups from multiple sides, fueled by cattle rustling, land disputes, attacks on herders, revenge killings, illegal mining disputes and long-standing ethnic grievances which we have consistently documented.

The violence is tragic.But it is not the Hollywood-style “Christianity versus Islam” fantasy Birbir and his cohort are selling online. In fact, many of the incidents he ignores completely expose how selective and dishonest the propaganda has become.

For example, on May 10, 2026, troops of Sector 6 Operation Enduring Peace came under direct ambush from armed Berom militia while responding to reports of attacks on cattle around Gero area in Jos South LGA. The attackers reportedly attempted to encircle troops from surrounding hills before soldiers responded with superior firepower, forcing them to retreat toward Nyango and Daron communities.

During the attack, nine cows were killed, five injured and a Fulani herder identified as Aliyu Yusuf sustained gunshot wounds. Hours later, another soldier, Warrant Officer Rex Okang, was brutally attacked and badly injured by armed youths in Dorowa Tsoho, Barkin Ladi.

So the same military Birbir accuses of “supporting Fulani terrorists” is now also being attacked by the very armed groups he portrays as helpless victims. This is now becoming a very consistent and dangerous pattern of insurrection.

Whenever troops refuse to permit retaliatory attacks, attempt arrests, recover illegal weapons or block armed mobilisations, they are immediately blackmailed with accusations of “supporting Fulani terrorists.” When checkpoints are maintained, troops are accused of bias.
When checkpoints are withdrawn after attacks on soldiers, troops are accused of abandonment. When troops stop reprisals, they are accused of supporting one side.
When they arrest armed suspects, activists suddenly scream “targeting indigenous people.”

It is a propaganda carefully designed to delegitimize security operations anytime armed militias fail to get what they want. The reality on ground is that Nigerian troops have repeatedly risked their lives protecting communities across Plateau regardless of ethnicity. Troops have responded to attacks on Berom communities. Troops have also responded to attacks on Fulani settlements. Troops have recovered rustled cattle. Troops have evacuated wounded civilians from both sides.

Troops have prevented reprisals. Troops have died trying to restore peace. In the same plateau troops under attack of bandits and lost many officers and men.

Only recently in Mangu, a senior Nigerian Army officer was brutally killed after they came under heavy fire by the local Militia in Plateau. At different times, they have been attacked by Berom youths. But none of these matter to some propagandists whose primary interest is sustaining outrage and exporting a false genocide narrative abroad.

Perhaps the most dramatic chapter in Alex Birbir’s latest online fiction series was his now-famous “Burial Attack” story, where he attempted to convince international audiences that heavily armed Fulani jihadists surrounded a Christian burial ground in Barkin Ladi, launched a coordinated massacre operation, exchanged gunfire for “four to five hours,” while the Nigerian military conveniently disappeared into thin air.

During the tense atmosphere surrounding the burial, armed local youths were already positioned around the area and gunfire was reportedly initiated from within the local militia side toward surrounding hills after rumors spread about possible movements nearby.

According to Birbir, mourners were abandoned, Christians were left “with sticks and machetes,” machine guns echoed everywhere, terrorists almost overran the burial ground, and only brave local youths prevented “dozens and dozens” from being massacred. Even more revealing was Birbir’s own statement where he proudly declared that local youths “took up arms” to defend the area. In the aftermath, not one casualty, not one corpse, not one verified gunshot victim. No hospital admission. No medical evacuation. No emergency death report, was recorded.

Mr Birbir should therefore tell us how does a supposed four-to-five-hour terrorist assault involving machine guns and sniper rifles end without a single confirmed casualty? Did the terrorists suddenly forget how to shoot? Or perhaps, just perhaps, the entire event was massively exaggerated and manipulated for propaganda purposes.

Birbir also made another astonishing claim, insisting that “Christians defended themselves with sticks and stones against machine guns and AK-47s.” Again, facts expose the dishonesty. Security operations in Plateau have repeatedly uncovered Ak47 riffles, pistols, locally fabricated rifles, illegal arms factories, ammunition components and armed Berom militia networks linked to criminal elements operating in the state.

Several suspects involved in illegal weapons fabrication, robbery, and targeted attacks have already been arrested by troops while credible information has uncovered more arms factories. Only recently, troops recovered another fabricated rifle from a Berom militia member during operations in Barkin Ladi. If people are only carrying “sticks and stones,” where are these rifles, ammunition and fabricated weapons suddenly coming from?

Do illegal assault rifles or Ak47 now grow naturally inside Plateau or Berom farmlands? Even more revealing was Birbir’s own statement where he admitted that local youths “took up arms” to defend themselves. That statement alone destroys the entire “helpless civilians” narrative being marketed internationally. Mention a single scenario where they have defended their communities, instead those arms were used to perpetuate targeted attacks, armed robbery and cattle rustling. This year alone, the Berom militia have rustled or killed more than 400 cattle belonging to the fulani. None of these reports was acknowledge by Me Birbir.

Nobody denies that communities have suffered terrible losses in Plateau as a result of the attacks by Fulani bandits. Both Berom and Fulani communities have buried victims. Both sides have suffered same level of attacks. Both sides have experienced reprisals.

But what Birbir and similar propagandists are doing is dangerously reframing a complex communal conflict into a false one-directional religious extermination narrative. And that distortion is extremely dangerous because it radicalizes youths, fuels retaliation and undermines peace efforts.

Perhaps the greatest irony of all is this,
the same armed groups now attacking soldiers are often from the same communities loudly accusing the military of not protecting them enough. Troops are insulted when they intervene. Troops are attacked when they maintain neutrality. Troops are blackmailed when they stop reprisals. Troops are demonized when they arrest suspects. Naked women run to the street to protest. In one instant, they attacked troops, dismantled their check point and burnt some of their equipment.

Yet if the military withdraws completely and violence escalates uncontrollably, the same voices will again blame the military for “abandoning Christians.” This endless contradiction exposes the real problem:
Some actors no longer want peace.
They want validation for retaliation.

The unfortunate truth is that Plateau’s violence will never end if every attempt to enforce neutrality is interpreted as “supporting the enemy.” No military operation can succeed where armed militias are defended, illegal weapons are normalized and propaganda rewards revenge narratives over accountability.

Accusing troops of “aiding terrorists” simply because they prevented armed youths from attacking another civilian settlement is not only dishonest, it is reckless and inflammatory.

Peace in Plateau will only come through truth, accountability, disarmament and honest dialogue, not through emotional podcasts designed to inflame international outrage while ignoring the full complexity of the conflict.

Alex Birbir’s Plateau False Narrative Collapses Under the Weight of Facts

Continue Reading

News

Zulum Appoints Prof. Bukar Usman as Pioneer Chairman of Zakkat, Waqf Commission, Names New Secondary Education Board Member

Published

on

Zulum Appoints Prof. Bukar Usman as Pioneer Chairman of Zakkat, Waqf Commission, Names New Secondary Education Board Member

By: Our Reporter

Borno State Governor, Professor Babagana Umara Zulum, has approved the appointment of Prof. Bukar Muhammad Usman as the pioneer Executive Chairman of the newly established Zakkat and Waqf Collection and Distribution Commission.

The Commission, which became operational in 2025 following the passage of its enabling law by the State Assembly and the Governor’s subsequent assent, is mandated to oversee the collection, administration, and equitable distribution of Zakkat and Waqf across the state.

The appointment of the Executive Chairman is in accordance with the powers conferred on the Governor under Section 4 (1) and (2) of the Commission’s Law, 2025.

Prof. Bukar Muhammad Usman, a Professor of Arabic Literature and a distinguished Islamic scholar, brings to the role expertise in Islamic jurisprudence and academic leadership.

He began his academic career at the Nigerian Arabic Language Village, Gamboru Ngala, where he served as a lecturer from 2006 to 2018. Following the completion of his Ph.D., he joined the Department of Arabic at Yobe State University, where he currently holds the rank of professor.

Before his appointment, Prof. Bukar served as Head of the Department of Arabic at Yobe State University and was a member of both the university’s Senate and Council. He also served on the editorial board of Al-Nur Journal, a scholarly publication of the Department of Arabic.

He participated in numerous seminars, workshops, and conferences both nationally and internationally. He has published several scholarly papers in reputable local and international journals and also supervised many Master’s and Ph.D. theses across various institutions.

In a related development, Governor Zulum has also approved the appointment of Malam Muhammad Ibrahim Muhammad as a member of Borno State Senior Secondary Education Board, representing Southern Borno.

The appointment follows the demise of Alhaji Ibrahim Sarki in January 2026 and is in line with the provisions of Section 4 (1)(a) of the Borno State Senior Secondary Education Board (Amendment) Law, 2024.

Until his appointment, Malam Muhammad Ibrahim Muhammad was a lecturer at the College of Education, Gashua, and holds a Master’s degree in Fundamentals of Religion.

Governor Zulum congratulated the appointees and urged them to deploy their experience, integrity, and commitment toward strengthening their respective institutions.

Both appointments are for an initial term of four years and are subject to confirmation by the Borno State House of Assembly.

Zulum Appoints Prof. Bukar Usman as Pioneer Chairman of Zakkat, Waqf Commission, Names New Secondary Education Board Member

Continue Reading

News

Zulum elated by Tinubu’s approval of 3 federal institutions for Borno in 3 years

Published

on

Zulum elated by Tinubu’s approval of 3 federal institutions for Borno in 3 years

.. Says Borno will reciprocate the gesture in 2027

By: Our Reporter

Borno State Governor, Professor Babagana Umara Zulum, has commended President Bola Ahmed Tinubu for approving three major federal institutions for the state within three years of assuming office.

Zulum made the commendation on Sunday in Bama, shortly after a sympathy visit to residents affected by a devastating windstorm that struck part of the town last week.

Zulum specifically noted that since President Tinubu took office, he has approved the take-off of three vital federal institutions, including the Federal College of Education, Gwoza; the National Orthopaedic Hospital, Azare; and the Federal University of Agriculture and Entrepreneurship, Bama.

He expressed delight that the institutions would directly transform the lives of the people of Borno through job creation, improved access to quality education, and specialised healthcare delivery.

Zulum commended President Tinubu for his sustained attention to Borno’s recovery and development needs, noting that the three federal institutions would significantly accelerate post-insurgency reconstruction and economic revitalisation.

“I want to draw your attention to the establishment of the Federal University of Agriculture and Entrepreneurship, Bama, by the President of the Federal Republic of Nigeria, Bola Ahmed Tinubu, just two days ago.

“The pioneer principal officers were appointed. This is a remarkable achievement, and we want to hail the President for what he has done.”

“The take-off of the Federal College of Education, Gwoza, and the National Orthopaedic Hospital, Azare, was achieved under the administration of President Tinubu; therefore, I want to commend him and assure him that the people of Borno State will reciprocate the kind gesture at the appropriate time.”

Zulum had last year announced the handover of Umar Ibn Ibrahim El-Kanemi College of Education, Science, and Technology, Bama, for the immediate commencement of academic activities at the newly established Federal University of Agriculture and Entrepreneurship, Bama. The Governor also approved one billion naira for the immediate take-off of the University.

The Governor has consistently offered similar support to the Federal Polytechnic, Monguno; Federal College of Education, Gwoza; and National Orthopaedic Hospital, Azare, approving over N5 billion to facilitate a seamless take-off.

The Governor also inspected ongoing construction work for the 19 Brigade headquarters in Bama, underscoring his administration’s determination to consolidate security gains and restore full civil authority around the Bama general area.

Zulum elated by Tinubu’s approval of 3 federal institutions for Borno in 3 years

Continue Reading

Trending

Verified by MonsterInsights