Separating facts from propaganda on alleged civilian casualties in Yankuzo, Zamfara

By: Zagazola Makama

In the aftermath of the 4 August precision airstrike in Yankuzo Ward, Tsafe LGA, a familiar and tired script began circulating, claims that Nigerian Air Force (NAF) jets “bombed a civilian wedding” and killed innocents. It is a narrative so recklessly peddled, one wonders if the authors even bothered to look at what happened next.

Within hours of the strike, surviving members of Ado Allero’s gang the same men supposedly attending this “civilian” gathering, stormed Yankuzo and abducted its traditional ruler, Alhaji Babangida Kogo. Their reason? They suspected he provided intelligence for the strike that killed more than 30 armed terrorists and injured many more. The monarch was later released when they confirmed he had nothing to do with the strike, but the message was clear: the people at that “wedding” were not farmers and traders, they were bandits preparing for war.

If the gathering had truly been a harmless wedding of non-combatants, why would the immediate retaliation be the abduction of a monarch over alleged military collaboration? The logic collapses under its own weight.

Even more telling is what followed: Ado Allero deployed fighters to lay an ambush against troops moving to exploit the success of the strike. That encounter left one soldier dead and another wounded. Again, the so-called “wedding guests” if we follow the propagandists’ claims turned out to be well-armed, battle-ready militants on more than 10 motorcycles, mounting deliberate attacks on security forces. That is not the profile of civilians caught in crossfire; it is the textbook behaviour of a routed but still dangerous insurgent cell.

The strike hit exactly what it was intended to hit: armed combatants. No credible source not local residents, not field operatives, not even the so-called “eye witnesses” whispered about by detractors has produced verifiable evidence of civilian casualties. On the contrary, those closest to the scene confirm that the targets were militants.

So, where exactly are these supposed civilian casualties? Not one credible community source, medical facility, or independent observer has produced evidence of dead or injured non-combatants. On the contrary, residents of Yankuzo and surrounding areas have openly expressed relief at the neutralisation of the fighters who had been terrorising them. If the “civilian casualties” story had any substance, we would expect to see mourning families, burial records, or at the very least photographic evidence flooding the same channels pushing the accusation. The absence of any genuine civilian victim list, contrasted with the very visible armed reprisals by the terrorists, should embarrass anyone still pushing this hollow propaganda.

Those pushing the civilian casualty line must now answer the only question that matters: where are these so-called victims? Names? Families? Graves? Or are we meant to accept yet another recycled propaganda trope from those who have made a cottage industry out of dressing up armed terrorists as misunderstood locals?

Zagazola Makama is a Counter Insurgency Expert and Security Analyst in the Lake Chad

Separating facts from propaganda on alleged civilian casualties in Yankuzo, Zamfara

NIMC Issues Important Information on NIN’s
Self-Service Modification

By: Michael Mike

The National Identity Management Commission (NIMC) has informed the general public of important guidelines on the access to the self-service modification portal of the National Identification Number (NIN).

The Commission in a statement by its spokesman, Dr. Kayode Adegoke on Thursday asked that applicants for the NIN Data Modification should note that for the Single Browser and Device Access, the self-service account is uniquely tied to the browser and device used during registration as such access to the account is therefore limited to that specific browser on that particular device.

Adegoke said to change the NIN record, the user must log in using the same browser and device originally used to register the account, stressing that any attempt to use a different browser or device may result in access issues.

He also warned that clearing the browser cache will reset the browser and may lock the account, noting that If this occurs, the account will require an unlinking process to regain access.

Adegoke said once a browser and device are locked, the users are permitted a maximum of five (5) unlock attempt requests, warning that no further requests will be processed after this limit is exceeded.

He noted that: “These are some of the measures put in place by the Commission to safeguard and protect the Identity of the users of the self-service modifications portal.”

“NIMC urges all users to carefully follow these guidelines to avoid unnecessary disruptions and delays. Your cooperation is greatly appreciated as the Commission continue to safeguard your data and improve service delivery,” Adegoke said.

NIMC Issues Important Information on NIN’s
Self-Service Modification

Doubts trail dialogue with Bello Turji despite release of 32 captives

By: Zagazola Makama

The recent release of 32 kidnapped victims by notorious bandit leader Bello Turji, following behind-the-scenes dialogue with Islamic clerics and representatives of federal authorities, has triggered cautious reactions and deep scepticism from stakeholders in the North-West, particularly in Zamfara State long considered the epicentre of Nigeria’s banditry crisis.

Though the development has been hailed by some as a potential opening for peace, others see it as déjà vu, a replay of failed dialogue attempts that emboldened criminal elements and undermined justice for thousands of victims across rural communities in Zamfara, Sokoto, Katsina, and Kebbi States.

One of the most vocal critics is Alhaji Sani Shinkafi, a prominent political leader in Shinkafi LGA and former Chairman of the Zamfara State Committee on Prosecution of Banditry-Related Offences.

Speaking in a monitored programme on Tuesday, Shinkafi rejected the peace overtures with Turji, describing them as “unsustainable and morally indefensible,” citing past betrayals and the broader scale of insecurity that extends beyond a single warlord.

According to Shinkafi, the latest round of engagements with Turji was facilitated not just by local clerics but included emissaries from the Office of the National Security Adviser and the Chairman of the Senate Committee on Intelligence and Security, Senator Shehu Buba Umar.

“These meetings reportedly happened about three times in July in Turji’s hideout,” Shinkafi disclosed, adding that though 32 victims were released, the process lacked transparency and structure. Where were these victims taken after release? Was the traditional protocol followed Emir’s palace, state government, medical evaluation? Nothing of such was done,” he queried.

Observers note that peace dialogues with bandit leaders are not new to Zamfara. Under former governors Abdul’aziz Yari and Bello Matawalle, multiple deals were initiated particularly through the efforts of Sheikh Ahmad Gumi. Each time, initial gains in the form of temporary ceasefires or prisoner swaps were followed by renewed violence, extortion, and further territorial expansion by criminal groups.

“This is the irony of the latest ‘peace talk’,” Shinkafi said. “We’ve seen this before, and each time we empower these criminals further.”

He added that making peace with Turji ignores the broader network of armed actors operating across the region, including Mallam Ila, Kanawa, Dan Bokolo, Sani Black, Dogo Gide and others.

“Sani Black recently demanded ransom payment in gold not naira from Zumi communities. What peace are we talking about when over 40 local governments across the North-West are under siege?”he said.

He argued that one major concern is the narrow focus of the dialogue. While Turji remains one of the most prominent warlords operating in Sokoto and Zamfara’s eastern axis, other factions continue to abduct, kill, and extort villagers.

Communities such as Sabon Birni, Goronyo, Issa, Kamarawa, Bafarawa, and Gatawa in Sokoto East remain under persistent attack, with dozens of hostages still in captivity. Just days ago, in Sabon Garin Damri (Bakura LGA), 70 people were reportedly kidnapped, with 11 confirmed dead.

Shinkafi argued that peace talks with a single actor like Turji, no matter how well-intentioned risk creating a perception of state weakness and selective negotiation.

“Even if Turji releases 32 victims with very fee arms and ammunitions, what about the rest? What about the others he didn’t release? What about the commanders who didn’t sit at the table?” he asked.

Malam Ibrahim Issa, another activist, said Dogo Gide recently claimed that he has seized fire in Kaduna state, but his boyz recently carried out attack on Nigerian army troops in Niger and few days later, he carried out another attack in Kebbi state.

“Likewise Yellow Jambros, who also surrendered in Kaduna and stopped hostilities in Katsina but he men are still attack Plateau and Benue state,”he said.

Banditry without ideology

Shinkafi further argued that unlike Niger Delta militants, who were driven by environmental degradation and resource control, the North East insurgents driven by religious ideologies, the North-West’s bandits are not guided by ideology or political grievances.

“These men are building a criminal enterprise. They extort farmers, kidnap schoolchildren, kill villagers, and run illegal mining operations. What ideology are they promoting?” he asked.

He said Turji’s sudden interest in peace is likely tactical to regroup, seek legitimacy, or avoid military pressure.

While the release of any kidnapped person should be welcomed, experts warn that fragmented negotiations, especially those lacking legal oversight and accountability, may set dangerous precedents.

“There must be a coordinated national framework for any engagement. Anything short of this is appeasement,” said a retired senior intelligence officer who declined to be named.

In the meantime, voices like Shinkafi’s are pushing for a more resolute military and judicial approach to end the cycle of violence and impunity.

“The only peace worth having is one anchored on justice, disarmament, and state authority,” he said.

Another layer of complication is the apparent lack of coordination with the Zamfara State Government. Governor Dauda Lawal, elected on a reformist platform, has publicly distanced himself from any peace overture with criminal elements.

“Governor Lawal is not part of this. He has maintained a clear position that no dialogue will be held with armed bandits unless they lay down their weapons unconditionally,” a senior government source told Zagazola.

Most of the bandits are not ready to lay down their arms. And even if they do, they are not willing to surrender themselves to the government for any form of rehabilitation. Most of the fulani bandits have large livestock and families too. Where do you want to keep them when you decide to confined them to a rehabilitation camp. What are you rehabilitating them for?

This policy divergence between federal-backed actors and the state government risks undermining a coherent security strategy and emboldening factions looking to exploit disunity between security stakeholders.

Doubts trail dialogue with Bello Turji despite release of 32 captives