Connect with us

News

Borno Health Sector coordination: How to build a contemporary risk communication sub sector against mounting emergencies

Published

on

Borno Health Sector coordination: How to build a contemporary risk communication sub sector against mounting emergencies.

By: Bodunrin Kayode

Sometimes the speed at which journalists poke their noses into important matters that concerns the truth when government authorities are involved is welcome. Especially when it involves sensitive sectors of the economy like health and the welfare of the people and it is obvious that the managers are inept or economical with some truths, it usually annoys such powers that be when reporters refuse to mind their businesses. Some senior public servants in government in Nigeria usually do not like being challenged when they do wrongs regardless of their professional learnings. They want to be the last to speak and it should be the final like we had during the likes of a former health minister, name withheld who always wanted to assert his weight in spite of his small stature on the union leaders who refused to be intimidated by him. Speaking after they have vomited their sometimes advertent mistakes in a meeting, is a taboo especially in the medical sector where life is involved directly. A pharmacist who tries to correct the mistakes of a medical doctor is frowned upon as insubordinate. A journalist contributing to make things work in the public health sector team by trying to rectify their excessive misuse of acronyms, makes some of them angry that someone is interfering in their business.They rather prefer the obvious disunity within the medical sector to linger instead of moving as team players as is the case in sanner climes.

But sadly the world does not work that way anymore. Some of those who express these worries hardly want to think outside the books especially when it comes to their turf even when the world has gone far in the realm of “risk communication” for instance in the public health sector. And most times big mistakes are made as a result of wrong communications from the so called experts from the world bodies charged with fixing health. And that has been the bane of the risk communication sector of the Borno Health sector partners coordination meeting before the advent of Dr Lawi Meshelia as incident manager. But thank God that for the first time in the last decade, 14 pillars have been created and professionals in the meeting are meant to think in one accord which is very important for the progress of the “emergency machinery” which Governor Babagana Zulum is interested in. We now have these pillars firmly rooted including the sensitive “surveillance” who are the epidemiological secret service who go around hunting down emergencies and ensuring that the house is fully briefed. The risk communication is also being straightened up to meet emerging emergencies as they come and collaborating with the surveillance and security which I had suggested should be made a pillar in one of our meetings and the head of the police hospital should be given that task. Whenever he is busy, he can always send a representative. There are many areas still marked as dangerous which the risk communication cannot penetrate because they will walk into the insurgents and be killed so they must be escorted by the security.

Before I proceed, we must keep in mind that “risk communication is the real time exchange of information, advice and opinions between experts or officials and people who face a hazard or threat to their survival, health, or economic or social well being.” Having said that, we should be mindful of the purposes and reasons for the risk communication pillar which is very vital in reaching out to the vulnerable people we are supposed to protect in the Borno insurgent war theatre. We cannot stop cholera from moving like a dangerous wizard from one council area to another if the risk communication is as brutally divided as it is now in the state and unprotected.
The WHO and UNICEF must work together as a team under the supervision of the state ministry of health and not the other way round. What we have is two world bodies flexing their muscles in different rooms, churning what they think is best for Borno but which is usually confusion. That is a wrong and it must be reversed as quickly as possible if the risk communication should be uplifted to where it should be. You cannot because you are spending donor funds treat people as if they are beneath you. It’s not right. Whatever meetings they want to hold in their respective agencies should never rubbish the risk communication pillar meeting which should have only one head from the state ministry of health who speaks for all of us during critically challenged periods of emergencies. The cliche of he who pays the piper dictates the tune can’t work in this instance because we are talking of our shared humanity with people dying for the wrong reasons. It’s a boring cliche that has killed this country and brought us to the sickening level we find ourselves now where humanity is thrown to the dogs. It is not permissible for Unicef and WHO to speak on behalf of the state in such meetings. They speak only when asked to contribute. What happens when that fellow is transferred? The head must be a ministry staff and both agencies must answer to him. That is the law and order which the present IM Dr Lawi brought in when he took charge.

Within the almost comatose health sector which existed in Borno from 2009 when the war started, health practitioners must be called to account to the people they claim to be dishing out dividends of democracy to even if it is on a humanitarian level which makes it free. And I believe it’s because of this accountability that the sector partners meeting was formed to evaluate and make progress.
It’s about ten years now into the rebuilding of the Borno emergency health sector and some of us who have been around since then can gladly say well done to all the managers who have passed through the system till date injecting their own expertise in one way or the other. The world bodies inclusive and the non governmental organizations.

Attracting more media practitioners into the risk communication

Colleagues, of a truth, the media practitioner is not out to witch hunt anyone but purely to ensure that every one accounts for his stewardship as leaders in the sector. A practitioner’s presence in the risk communication like myself or even Madam Pauline in the polio sub sector is to assist in disseminating the good news when there is need to do so. If Cholera has killed hundreds in the last ten years, we say so. Why? So that the people will take corrections from the way they have been living to what the health authorities have designed for them to stay alive. This is because no Commissioner of Health or trained doctor wants his patients to die out of ignorance. So they need the risk communication which is definitely tied to latest skills in contemporary media practice. And if you lack knowledge of the workings of the media even if you are from the world health organization (WHO) or United Nations Children’s Fund (UNICEF) you will surely fail in most of your plannings as it concerns the people. Media related practice is needed in every profession that is involved in communication. From security to teaching to medicine. You cannot succeed in modern medicine without effective communication or even the media. And when I emphasize media, I am not talking about radio which is believed to be the widely used to hear from government by the northern illiterates in the country. The so called radio which is believed to reach at least 50% of the population is a luxurious instrument now in Borno because at least 40% of that 50 or 60% which could be reached if their surrounding transmitters have not been blown off by boko haram cannot afford to buy a mini radio of N1000. With the floating of the naira, this figure may even be an understatement in the market.
TV is ruled out for the most vulnerable who even if you give a free radio set to listen to cholera or covid jingles will rather sell same to buy his immediate needs. So how do we correct these lapses? Simple.
Ensure that over 60%of your communication is interpersonal by using megaphones and Outside broadcast vans to reach the vulnerables. It is the most reliable means for communication in Borno for now till the war ends.
And for the radio which the old fashioned people still hold on to, more practitioners should be attracted to health.
We should involve the media more proactively by creating of health desks in the media houses. Health desks cannot be just one person. I made this point during a round table at the NUJ in maiduguri recently and someone showed me a health correspondent in a radio station. The fellow obviously does not know the difference between an ideal health desk and just one correspondent. For maiduguri, just one correspondent covering emergencies and the entire health ministry is not right. In fact, that is a huge joke as long as insurgency persists. A minimum of three to five persons should form the fulcrum of a functioning health desk. A senior correspondent or line editor and a bevy of reporters ready to cover the primary, secondary and tertiary centres where things happen daily. One person is just a correspondent not a desk and is grossly inhibited. You do not parade just one person to handle emergencies and non emergencies it’s a sick joke that can fly anywhere without a war but not in Borno or Yobe because of our peculiarities and sometimes high mortality rates from infectious diseases. The creation of health desks in the near future will produce a massive army of professionals ready to handle the risk communication even in the entire BAY states. That is the ideal. And it is very much possible to handle if the Commissioner visits the general managers and advocates for their creation with support from them. Getting a sound professional as information officer in the parent ministry of health will also help because it is he who will be the go between after the courtesy calls which speaks more than a mere memo.

The voice of the journalist as the fourth estate of the realm is equally the voice of the people. So when they call for accountability within the news managers about the health sector for instance to appear before them in the Press Centre, they are simply saying account for your stewardship before the people. They do not mean to disrespect anyone who is a “big man” who may not want to appear before the gentlemen of the media as if they are before their Lordships in a court of law as it were.

Risk communication within the Borno health sector

Risk communication in Borno particularly can never succeed without the major imputes of journalists within or even outside the Health sector. This pillar equally needs the massive support of the translators in the programs department which may not necessarily be journalists but media practitioners in their own rights. We cannot go to northern Borno and be speaking English with resident internally displaced people (idps) for instance. Such messages must be knocked down into Kanuri not even hausa because these are people who do not understand the hausa language no matter how international you may think it is. These are some of the challenges that have characterized the health sector meetings. The Borno radio television can boast of translators in Shua Arab, Kanuri, kibaku, Bura, and margi languages any day we need them.
The world bodies will be harming the recipients of messages if they sit down in Abuja and draft messages for the risk communication sub sector only in English and Hausa and forgetting that there are about 15 dialects in Gwoza some of who barely understands the hausa language which was virtually forced on them by virtue of recolonization. That could be applicable in the north west of the country surely not north east and central. There are always willing hands in the media ready to help out to produce these sound bites if they make proper enquires. You do not go to Limankara in Gwoza and start speaking hausa if you want them to drop some daring wrong habits which invites killer diseases. You look for someone who understands their dialect and make him do the translation from hausa if you are one of the fixated professionals who assume wrongly that hausa is a general language in the north. It would sink better than hausa which is obviously general in the north west of the country. These are the solutions which would help us from watching people die from meningitis for instance when we could help keep them alive.

The Borno health sector is in a critical buildup situation in which some forms of basic communications must be handled by local people who studied, communication, journalism or even some form of social science or public relations. Risk communication is not something you can handle simply because you did general studies in medical school or in public health colleges. Far from it. Its something you must study to apply same so you save yourself from the pains and embarrassments being faced when it comes to the nitty gritty and you are watching people die from cholera, COVID-19 or diphtheria. That is why the intervention of the ministry of health into the various newsrooms by way of “lobby” for a health desk is very pertinent. No general manager will refuse sponsorship of reporters for refresher courses in the health sector as is applied in the more developed climes. Send them abroad for three months and by the time they come they will forget departments of politics or sports and follow health as if it was their initial calling. That is the only way we can attract more hands on deck to perfect further the myriads of mistakes being made by the risk communication pillar in the Borno health sector. I have tried severally to drag in my colleagues to join me in the sector meetings but they do not see the attraction to come in especially with the stereotypical mentality of some practitioners who do not in the speed of the social media. We have to create the attraction by following the tips I gave above. We are in an emergency and must carry a regimented mentality until all these pass us by.

Finally, now that we all know that a lot of damage has been done to our transmitters in the state rendering the capability of the old fashion radio to get to at least 50%of the population, the plan B option left to the sector is interpersonal communication as I stressed earlier and that is done by using vehicles to all the crannies of the state whenever there is an emergency to ensure that the people get to know what is going on. It’s is obvious that less than ten percent of this 50% of the affected population can afford phones. Let’s say we teach them how to tune to their radio in their phones, how many of them will be able to listen to jingles in their native dialects? When you have at least 70% of the population of the people as stark illiterates as alluded to by Governor Babagana Zulum, how then do you continue to reach out to them in English or hausa?
It is the duty of the risk communication people to size up the environment they want to penetrate and communicate in the language they will get maximum effect and not waste the scarce resources on radio stations that package programs purely for the elites. English language should be made a secondary language of communication in Borno until the war ends and emergencies subside.
Lastly, there are many areas that vehicles may not access in the local councils of Borno State. The director of health in the councils can be drafted into any of the pillars he is wired to handle. As they hold their sub sectoral meetings at council level, he should be able to produce his own army of translators who will be on standby to enter any corner where strange diseases are coming up to kill people. And they should be able to feed Mallam Modu and his team or directly to the EOC manager Dr Simon for onward transmission if they can’t get their pillar heads directly. By my assessment, risk communication volunteers in the entire council areas should not be less than 54 while that of the state should not be less than 20 very fluent in diverse languages and dialects of the people. That is the ideal. The
Commissioner of Health should be able to liaise with his colleague in transport ministry to ease the stress on the resident communicator in each council areas. By resident I mean each council area should have one personnel trained for the job because all the resident media houses in Borno cannot be able to supply enough personnel for the job even if they are just 20. The risk communication people should be given bikes and megaphones to get to those places and shout if need be to change the narrative of any wicked emergency. That is the drill my dear colleagues for excellence at these harsh emergency periods .

Borno Health Sector coordination: How to build a contemporary risk communication sub sector against mounting emergencies

Continue Reading
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

News

FG Raises Alarm Over Gambian Directive to Replace 57 Nigerian Bank Workers

Published

on

FG Raises Alarm Over Gambian Directive to Replace 57 Nigerian Bank Workers

…Commission seeks reversal of December deadline, warns against displacement of African professionals

By: Michael Mike

An agency of the Federal Government, the Nigerians in Diaspora Commission (NiDCOM) has called on the Central Bank of The Gambia to reverse a directive requiring banks operating in the country to replace non-Gambian employees with qualified Gambian nationals, warning that the policy could lead to the displacement of 57 Nigerian professionals.

The directive, reportedly issued on September 16, 2026, gives banks until December 31, 2026, to replace their existing non-Gambian employees with Gambians, a development NiDCOM said had raised serious concerns about the welfare and employment rights of affected Nigerians.

The Chairman/Chief Executive Officer of NiDCOM, Hon. Abike Dabiri-Erewa, described the development as deeply worrisome, particularly as the affected Nigerian professionals reportedly possess valid residency and work permits and have made significant contributions to The Gambia’s banking sector.

In a statement issued in Abuja on Tuesday, the Commission acknowledged The Gambia’s right to promote local employment and develop its workforce but insisted that such policies must respect existing employment arrangements, legitimate work authorisations and the principles of African solidarity and regional integration.

NiDCOM said information available to it indicated that 57 Nigerian professionals working in four Nigerian-origin banks operating in The Gambia could be affected by the directive.

The Commission also drew attention to the economic contributions of the four banks, which collectively account for approximately 37.2 per cent of total banking industry deposits, valued at 35.3 billion Gambian dalasi, and 32.6 per cent of loans, worth 7.67 billion dalasi.

The banks also reportedly control 37 per cent of the industry’s total assets, valued at 44.78 billion dalasi, while accounting for about 34.5 per cent of investments in Central Bank bonds.

More significantly, NiDCOM said the four institutions reportedly contributed 90 per cent of the funding supporting the operations of the National Water and Electricity Company (NAWEC), highlighting their importance to the Gambian economy
.
The Commission expressed concern that a blanket employment replacement policy could undermine the contributions of African professionals and investors to host economies, particularly at a time when African countries are seeking to deepen economic cooperation and regional integration.

It argued that encouraging African investment and the free movement of people while implementing policies capable of indiscriminately displacing qualified African professionals could undermine the objectives of continental economic integration.

NiDCOM therefore urged the Central Bank of The Gambia to immediately reconsider and reverse the directive, calling for consultations with the Nigerian High Commission in Banjul, the affected financial institutions and other relevant stakeholders to achieve an equitable resolution.

The Commission also appealed to Gambian authorities to uphold the spirit of the Economic Community of West African States (ECOWAS) integration framework and the longstanding cordial relationship between Nigeria and The Gambia.
It called for constructive diplomatic engagement to resolve the dispute without jeopardising the livelihoods of affected Nigerian professionals or the broader economic relationship between both countries.

The development comes against the backdrop of regional efforts to promote the free movement of people, capital and services, as well as stronger economic partnerships among African countries.

FG Raises Alarm Over Gambian Directive to Replace 57 Nigerian Bank Workers

Continue Reading

News

Leading Chinese Modernization Steadily Forward Through the Party’s Self-Revolution

Published

on

Leading Chinese Modernization Steadily Forward Through the Party’s Self-Revolution

By: Yu Dunhai, Chinese Ambassador to Nigeria

Days ago, the Fifth Plenary Session of the 20th Central Committee of the Communist Party of China concluded in Beijing. The session reviewed and adopted the Resolution of the Central Committee of the CPC on Certain Major Issues concerning Persevering with Full and Rigorous Party Self-Governance. It sets out systematic plans for continuing to exercise full and rigorous self-governance of the Party on the new journey in the new era, providing a strong political guarantee for advancing the great cause of building a strong country and achieving national rejuvenation through Chinese modernization.

Through this plenary session, the world has clearly seen that the Communist Party of China has grown stronger through self-revolution, that China’s development path has become clearer and more determined, and that China’s sincere willingness to share governance experience and work with other countries to create a better future has been further demonstrated.

To govern the country well, we must first govern the Party well; only when the Party thrives can the nation prosper. China’s success hinges on the Party, and on exercising full and rigorous Party self-governance. Since the 18th National Congress of the CPC, the Party has advanced full and rigorous self-governance with extraordinary historical courage and strategic resolve. The fight against corruption has achieved an overwhelming victory and been comprehensively consolidated. Practice has fully proven that, as the world’s largest Marxist governing party, the Communist Party of China possesses a powerful capacity to identify problems, correct deviations, and achieve self-purification, self-improvement, self-renewal, and self-enhancement through its own efforts. It has always been the core force leading China’s development and progress and safeguarding the fundamental interests of the people.

Self-revolution is not an abstract political concept; it is a realistic driving force that promotes national development and benefits hundreds of millions of people. It is precisely by consistently advancing full and rigorous Party self-governance that the CPC has been able to rally the entire society into a powerful, unified force, translating governance efficacy into tangible development results, and writing new chapters in the twin miracles of rapid economic growth and long-term social stability.

China has built the world’s largest and most complete industrial system. Its manufacturing value-added has long ranked first globally. It has nurtured a middle-income group of more than 400 million people, historically solved the problem of absolute poverty, and lifted hundreds of millions of rural residents out of poverty. These tangible development achievements are powerful evidence that the Party’s self-revolution empowers national governance and benefits the people.

China’s development cannot be separated from the world, and the world’s prosperity also needs China. As the world’s second-largest economy, China has the most promising super-large-scale market and has contributed around 30 percent to global economic growth for many consecutive years, serving as an important multiplier and stabilizer. The series of strategic arrangements made at the Fifth Plenary Session of the 20th CPC Central Committee are not only top-level designs for China’s own long-term development, but also contain development opportunities for the world.

A China that persists in self-revolution and continues to develop steadily will keep expanding high-level opening-up and inject lasting momentum into the stability of global industrial and supply chains and the recovery of the world economy.
At present, profound changes unseen in a century are accelerating, and the four deficits in peace, development, security, and governance continue to grow more pronounced. Developing countries’ desire to independently explore modernization paths is becoming ever stronger. Against this backdrop, the CPC’s practice of advancing national governance through self-revolution has drawn wide international attention.

This reflects recognition of China’s development path and governance effectiveness, as well as keen interest in the logic of self-revolution in Party and state governance.

China never exports its development model, attaches no political conditions, and never interferes in other countries’ internal affairs. We always respect every country’s independent choice of a development path suited to its national conditions and are ready to engage in equal exchanges of governance experience with political parties and organizations around the world.

China continues to put into practice the Global Development Initiative, the Global Security Initiative, the Global Civilization Initiative, and the Global Governance Initiative, working with all parties to explore solutions to global challenges and contributing Chinese wisdom, Chinese solutions, and Chinese strength to building a community with a shared future for mankind.

Africa is a continent full of hope, a key force in the Global South, and an important partner on the path of Chinese modernization. Within the framework of the Forum on China-Africa Cooperation(FOCAC), China has always upheld the principles of sincerity, real results, amity and good faith, as well as the correct approach to justice and interests, and has joined African countries in exploring modernization.

The 2024 FOCAC Beijing Summit was a success, when President Xi Jinping announced the “Ten Partnership Actions” for jointly advancing modernization, charting a clear blueprint for all-round China-Africa cooperation. Starting from 1 May this year, China has implemented zero-tariff treatment for all African countries that have diplomatic relations with China, further consolidating its position as Africa’s largest trading partner and helping African countries expand exports and advance industrial transformation.

The Communist Party of China is deepening exchanges of experience in Party governance and state administration with political parties across Africa, helping the China-Africa community with a shared future take root and becoming a vivid practice of building a community with a shared future for mankind.

Nigeria is Africa’s most populous country and a key engine driving the revitalization of the African continent. In more than two years as Chinese Ambassador to Nigeria, I have deeply felt the strong endogenous demand among all sectors of Nigerian society for good governance, stability and an independently chosen path of modernization. Nigeria is currently upholding strategic autonomy, pursuing a pragmatic foreign policy, advancing structural reforms, actively attracting foreign investment, expanding international trade, and promoting technological innovation, thereby continuously strengthening the foundations of independent development and demonstrating firm determination to follow a modernization path suited to its national conditions. Under the strategic guidance of President Xi Jinping and President Bola Ahmed Tinubu, the China-Nigeria comprehensive strategic partnership has entered a new stage of high-quality development.

The two sides continue to deepen exchanges of governance experience, closely align their development agendas, and make practical cooperation in various fields more solid, continuously benefiting the peoples of both countries.

Standing at a new historical starting point, China will take the spirit of the Fifth Plenary Session of the 20th CPC Central Committee as its guide, remain committed to the long-term task of self-revolution, unremittingly advance full and rigorous Party self-governance, firmly follow the path of Chinese modernization, unswervingly promote high-quality development and expand high-level opening-up, and steadfastly safeguard world peace and promote common development. China’s door of opening-up will only open wider.

The dividends of China’s development belong not only to the Chinese people but also to the whole world. We warmly look forward to walking hand in hand with friends in Nigeria on the path of equality, mutual learning and mutual benefit, jointly writing a new chapter of solidarity and revitalization among Global South countries.

Leading Chinese Modernization Steadily Forward Through the Party’s Self-Revolution

Continue Reading

News

Sanusi, Peterside, Adesina, Tijani, Oteh: Nigeria Must Move Beyond 4% Growth to Tackle Poverty

Published

on

Sanusi, Peterside, Adesina, Tijani, Oteh: Nigeria Must Move Beyond 4% Growth to Tackle Poverty

By: Michael Mike

Emir of Kano warns that GDP growth means little without improved living standards; Peterside blames corruption, political patronage for weak investment; Adesina urges investment in young people; Tijani identifies AI as key to productivity; Oteh calls for inclusive capital markets

Nigeria must move beyond celebrating modest economic growth and pursue a more ambitious growth target of 10 per cent, while ensuring that economic reforms translate into better living conditions for citizens, prominent Nigerian leaders and economic experts have said.

They spoke on Tuesday at the Oxford Global Think Tank Leadership Conference, with theme: “Leadership for a Prosperous Future,” where they examined Nigeria’s economic challenges, the need for stronger institutions, investment mobilisation, technological innovation and the development of its human capital.

The Emir of Kano, Muhammadu Sanusi II, cautioned that improvements in headline economic indicators should not be mistaken for improved welfare, insisting that the ultimate test of economic policy must be its impact on households.

Sanusi acknowledged that some macroeconomic indicators had improved and that the economy was recording growth of about 4.5 per cent. However, he argued that aggregate GDP figures did not adequately reflect the economic realities facing ordinary Nigerians.

He said the decline in GDP per capita since 2023, influenced by economic growth and currency depreciation, raised questions about whether the benefits of reform were reaching the wider population.

According to him, economic performance should be assessed not only through GDP growth, foreign reserves and other macroeconomic indicators, but also through improvements in education, healthcare, nutrition, employment, household incomes and poverty reduction.

The former Central Bank of Nigeria governor also cautioned against excessive reliance on portfolio inflows, which he said could be volatile and influenced by high interest rates and attractive short-term returns.

He stressed that sustainable economic progress required structural reforms that went beyond the removal of subsidies and changes to foreign exchange policy.

Sanusi called for investment in infrastructure, stronger accountability, transparency, reliable economic data and policies capable of expanding productive opportunities across the country.

He also warned that perceived regional imbalances in appointments, particularly in sensitive areas of national security, could undermine national cohesion, urging the government to pay greater attention to fairness and inclusion.

While acknowledging that the country’s economic situation was not entirely bleak, he maintained that reforms would have limited meaning if citizens continued to experience worsening living conditions.

Similarly, businessman and former Chairman of Stanbic IBTC Holdings, Atedo Peterside, said Nigeria should not be satisfied with economic growth of about four per cent when the country needed to grow at 10 per cent to create sufficient jobs, expand businesses and improve living standards.

Peterside identified weak investment as one of the major constraints to Nigeria’s economic expansion, arguing that the country could not achieve the required growth without a significant increase in investment as a proportion of GDP.

He blamed political patronage, corruption, regulatory harassment and the absence of a level playing field for discouraging investors and weakening the private sector.

According to him, businesses, particularly small and medium-scale enterprises, are often subjected to arbitrary demands and harassment by government regulators, making it difficult for them to operate, expand and create jobs.

He warned that public procurement had become a major avenue for the diversion of public resources, with inflated contract costs undermining the value of government expenditure.

Peterside described the abuse of procurement processes as a form of legalised theft, arguing that money meant for infrastructure and public services was being lost through inflated contracts and corrupt practices.

He said Nigeria needed to confront corruption and state capture if it hoped to attract the scale of domestic and foreign investment required to transform the economy.

The businessman also called for economic reforms to be implemented fairly, warning that citizens should not be made to bear the entire burden of adjustment while those benefiting from political connections and public resources remained insulated from its consequences.

He urged the government to strengthen institutions, protect businesses from arbitrary interference and ensure that public appointments and the allocation of national resources were guided by merit and national interest.

Former President of the African Development Bank, Dr Akinwumi Adesina, focused on the continent’s demographic advantage, arguing that Africa’s growing young population should be treated as an economic asset rather than a burden.

Adesina said population growth alone could not guarantee prosperity, stressing that the real advantage lay in building the capabilities of young people and connecting them to productive opportunities.

He noted that Africa’s population was projected to account for about a quarter of the world’s population by 2050, with young people making up a substantial proportion of the continent’s population.

He said the demographic trend presented an enormous opportunity, but warned that it could become a source of economic and social pressure if governments failed to invest adequately in education, healthcare, nutrition, technical skills and access to finance.

According to him, young Africans must be equipped not only to seek employment but also to create businesses, develop technologies and provide solutions to the continent’s challenges.

Adesina emphasised the need to expand digital and artificial intelligence capabilities, insisting that Africa should not remain merely a consumer of technologies developed elsewhere.

He called for stronger investment in human capital, affordable financing and infrastructure that would enable young people to turn their ideas into viable enterprises and productive ventures.

Minister of Communications, Innovation and Digital Economy, Dr Bosun Tijani, said Nigeria’s ability to convert knowledge and technology into productive economic activity would determine its future prosperity.

Tijani argued that natural resources alone could not guarantee national wealth, explaining that prosperity depended on how effectively a country applied knowledge, technology and technical expertise to the resources available to it.

Using the parable of the talents, he said countries that developed the capacity to improve and multiply the value of their resources would achieve greater prosperity than those that merely possessed them.

He cited the liberalisation of Nigeria’s telecommunications sector and the introduction of GSM services in 2001 as an example of how deliberate government policy, private investment and competition could transform an industry and create wider economic opportunities.

According to him, artificial intelligence represents another major productivity frontier, but Nigeria must first develop the capacity to absorb emerging technologies and apply them to its own economic needs.

He identified connectivity, computing and data infrastructure, skills and research, innovation capacity, and effective policies and institutions as the foundations required to build that capacity.

The minister disclosed that the Federal Government was pursuing an approximately 90,000-kilometre open-access fibre-optic network, backed by an estimated $2bn investment, to expand broadband connectivity across the country.

He also highlighted plans to strengthen shared computing infrastructure and develop a Nigerian large language model capable of supporting local languages, including Yoruba, Hausa and Igbo, as well as Nigerian-accented English.

Tijani said the government’s 3 Million Technical Talent programme was designed to build a pool of skilled Nigerians capable of participating in the global digital economy, while the National Artificial Intelligence Strategy would provide a framework for the responsible adoption and development of AI.

He also referred to the establishment of an AI community of practice, with initial support of $150,000, to encourage collaboration and practical application of the technology.

To illustrate the economic consequences of failing to adopt technology, Tijani compared agricultural productivity in Nigeria with that of countries such as Brazil and Argentina.

He said Nigerian maize yields were generally between 1.5 and 2.5 tonnes per hectare, compared with yields of about 10 tonnes per hectare in the South American countries, attributing part of the difference to the application of precision technologies and improved farming practices.

He urged businesses to take advantage of the digital infrastructure and other foundations being developed by government, stressing that the private sector must translate those investments into products, services, jobs and economic value.

Convener of the Oxford Global Think Tank Leadership Conference, Arunma Oteh, called for an ecosystem approach to economic development, arguing that sustainable growth required governments, businesses, investors, financial institutions and citizens to work together.

Oteh, a former Director-General of the Securities and Exchange Commission, said domestic capital markets had an important role to play in mobilising the resources needed to finance development and expand economic opportunities.

She emphasised the importance of increasing retail participation in capital markets, noting that broader participation would allow more Nigerians to invest in productive enterprises and share in the country’s economic growth.

She also highlighted the potential of pension funds to support long-term investment and democratise wealth creation, provided appropriate safeguards and investment frameworks were in place.

Oteh said Africa’s youthful population made investment in education, skills and employment particularly urgent, noting that about 70 per cent of the continent’s population was under the age of 30.

She argued that development efforts should not be excessively centralised, stressing that decentralisation could improve service delivery and allow communities to respond more effectively to local needs.

Using electricity supply in Aba, Abia State, as an example, she pointed to the possibilities offered by decentralised approaches to managing infrastructure and delivering essential services.

Oteh also stressed the importance of creating an enabling environment for businesses through reliable infrastructure, access to finance, regulatory certainty and a skilled workforce.

She cited the reported broad international participation in the Dangote Refinery’s proposed public offering as an indication of the potential of capital markets to attract investors beyond Nigeria’s borders.

The interventions converged on a central message: Nigeria’s economic challenge is not simply to record higher growth figures, but to build an economy in which investment, technology, human capital and accountable institutions combine to generate jobs, raise productivity and improve the welfare of citizens.

The speakers maintained that achieving such an outcome would require more than isolated policy announcements. It would depend on sustained reforms, a stronger private sector, effective public institutions and deliberate investment in the capabilities of Nigerians.

Sanusi, Peterside, Adesina, Tijani, Oteh: Nigeria Must Move Beyond 4% Growth to Tackle Poverty

Continue Reading

Trending

Verified by MonsterInsights