Connect with us

News

Defamation: Banire seeks redress from FIJ, threatens N1Billion libel suit

Published

on

Defamation: Banire seeks redress from FIJ, threatens N1Billion libel suit

By: Michael Mike

Senior Advocate of Nigeria and Convener of social advocacy group, United Action for Change, UAC, Dr. Muiz Banire has threatened to drag Foundation for Investigative Journalism, FIJ, to court for N1billion compensation if the organisation fails to meet his demands over damages done his 35 years legal and academic record.

This was disclosed in a letter titled “DEFAMATORY STATEMENTS AGAINST DR MUIZ BANIRE, SAN, OON PRE-ACTION PROTOCOL WRITTEN MEMORANDUM”, dated 7th May 2024 and addressed to FIJ by his lawyer, Kunle Adegoke SAN.

The letter whose copy was made available to journalists, read: “Our client Informed us, and we verily believe him, that: his attention was drawn to your organisation’s publication of
6th May 2024 with the caption: CONFIRMED: Muiz Banire Wrote the Petition That Triggered FIJ Reporter’s Abduction, published on your organisation’s website.

“In the said publication, your organisation wrote that our client is responsible for the abduction of one Daniel Ojukwu, a member of staff of your organisation.”

The letter further said “your publication deliberately conveyed the malicious
impression that our client engineered the kidnap of the aforementioned Daniel Ojukwu, thereby, suggesting that our client engages in criminal conduct; in this vein, your publication failed to mention that our client acted in line with his professional obligation in the representation of his client and that his office, M. A. Banire & Associates, authored the petition to the Inspector-General of Police on behalf of their client to report a case of
cyberbullying; your publication is, without a doubt, designed to damage the
reputation of our client, a purpose it is currently serving.

“Due to the popularity and effectiveness of your organisation’s online distribution network, millions of people have received and read your organisation’s defamatory publication; your organisation to note that your publication has dragged our client’s carefully nurtured good name in the mud and exposed our client to underserved public opprobrium; many that have read your publications, particularly his professional colleagues and associates, have expressed shock as to why our client would engage in the criminal behaviour your organisation attributed to him.

“Many also queried our client on the sins or transgressions of the said Daniel Ojukwu against the person of our client as to warrant our client resorting to the crime of engineering his abduction; to many of them, our client’s explanation that he had no personal relationship with the said Daniel Ojukwu and did not know him from Adam but only acted in his professional capacity as counsel to his client in the submission of a petition to the police on his client’s behalf fell on deaf ears; and your organisation has, through its false and heinous allegations, inflicted grievous damage on our client’s reputation.

“It is beyond cavil that the referenced publication casts a direct aspersion on the person of our client. To right-thinking members of society, you have presented
our client as a criminal who engages in abduction of people. Furthermore, your organisation’s publication has caused many to believe that our client, a Senior Advocate of Nigeria, a member of the Body of Benchers and a holder of a doctorate degree in Law, has no qualms in committing the heinous crime your organisation’s publications attributed to him.

“The gross implication of your organisation’s publication is that it has informed the world that our client is unfit to be a legal practitioner or an Officer of the Order of the Niger and is only fit for the four walls of a prison.”

The legal luminary therefore gave the organisation 14 days to retract and make amends, without which, he would be left with no other option than to drag FIJ before the court.

“It is in view of the foregoing that we, on behalf of our client, demand the following:
not later than 14 (fourteen) days from the delivery of this written memorandum to your organisation, your organisation immediately retracts the said publication and tenders an unreserved apology through all your organisation’s platforms and 5 (five) national daily newspapers circulating all over the federation, which must include the Punch Newspaper and ThisDay Newspaper;

“Not later than 14 (fourteen) days from the delivery of this letter on your organisation, pay the sum of N500,000,000.00 (Five Hundred Million Naira) as compensation for the reputation of our client that your organisation has maligned maliciously and/or recklessly.

As your organisation is aware, our client considers litigation only as a last resort. In this regard, our client is open to resolving this matter through conciliation, mediation, arbitration or other dispute resolution options you deem most suitable.”

At the expiration of the 14 days grace, the letter said Banire’s lawyers will pursue litigation to seek redress if the stated demands are not met. The court suit among other reliefs will seek “AN ORDER compelling your organisation to immediately withdraw the said publication and tender an unreserved apology in 5 (five) national daily newspapers, which must include Punch Newspapers and ThisDay Newspapers;

“An Order of the Honourable Court compelling your organisation to pay damages in the sum of N1,000,000,000.00 (One Billion Naira) as compensation for the person of our client that your organisation has defamed.”

Defamation: Banire seeks redress from FIJ, threatens N1Billion libel suit

Continue Reading
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

News

Zulum Apoints Hajiya Mairo Bunu Lawan as Chairperson of BOSCHMA

Published

on

Zulum Apoints Hajiya Mairo Bunu Lawan as Chairperson of BOSCHMA

By: Our Reporter

Borno State Governor, Professor Babagana Umara Zulum, has approved the appointment of Hajiya Mairo Bunu Lawan as Chairperson of the Board of the Borno State Contributory Healthcare Management Agency (BOSCHMA).

In a statement by the Special Adviser to the governor on Media, Dauda Iliya, the appointment is for an initial term of four (4) years.

The appointment is in accordance with the powers vested in the Governor under Section 5(1) of the Borno State Contributory Healthcare Management Agency Law, 2018.

Hajiya Mairo Bunu Lawan is a seasoned administrator and held various leadership positions including permanent secretary in the Borno State civil service in the ministries of Agriculture, Budget and Planning and Water Resources. She was also the former state Accountant General.

She holds a Masters degree in Business Administration (Finance) at University of Maiduguri, and Fellow of several professional bodies including Institute of Certified Public Accountants of Nigeria, Association of National Accountants of Nigeria, Institute of Public Administration of Nigeria and member Nigerian Institute of Management.

The newly appointed chairperson have attended numerous courses within and outside the country including Policy Strategic and Leadership course at the Institute of Policy and Strategic Studies Kuru, and training in International Public Sector Accounting Standards conducted by Pricewaterhouse Coopers (PwC) in London, among others.

Governor Zulum congratulated the newly appointed Chairperson and urged her to bring her wealth of experience to bear in advancing an effective contributory healthcare scheme in the state.

The appointment is subject to confirmation by the Borno State House of Assembly.

Zulum Apoints Hajiya Mairo Bunu Lawan as Chairperson of BOSCHMA

Continue Reading

News

ECOWAS Court Dismisses Claims of Property Rights Violation Initiated by Nigerian Software Developer

Published

on

ECOWAS Court Dismisses Claims of Property Rights Violation Initiated by Nigerian Software Developer

By: Michael Mike

The Community Court of Justice, ECOWAS on 12 May 2025 delivered its judgment in Case No ECW/CCJ/APP/25/24 concerning alleged property rights violation, specifically, breach of intellectual property rights. However, the Court dismissed all claims of rights violation considering that there was no deprivation of property or unlawful control of another’s property.

Case background
The Applicants – Mr Solomon Ekolama, a Nigerian and registered Engineer suing alongside a company registered in Nigeria – Far-Reaching Technologies claimed they developed a security software for crime management which was registered and certified by an agent of the Respondent – The Federal Government of Nigeria, in 2016. They averred that they submitted a copy to the National Information Technology Development Agency (NITDA) an agency of the Respondent, after which both parties held series of meetings and presentations that enabled access to their intellectual property.

They argued that NITDA published an identical software application on Google Playstore under a different name. They added that the functionality and administrative procedure of the Respondents’ application is a direct copy of their creation, accusing the Respondent of violating their right to property, theft of software application and invasion and infringement of their right to property.

The Applicants concluded that the Respondent was liable for intellectual property theft resulting in unquantifiable loss to them. They notified the Respondent of its breach of intellectual property rights on 14 August 2019.

The Respondent – Federal Republic of Nigeria denied the claims of the Applicants adding that the efforts and expenses incurred in the development of the software were done “within the freewill and pleasure of the Applicants.

Although the Respondent admitted the software was registered and certified by its agency, it argued that it did not contract the Applicants to produce or design a software and that it does not award contracts except through a procurement process in line with its Public Procurement Act. It added that the security number of its application differs from that of the Applicants’ and that the matter was premised on allegation of intellectual property theft which falls within the competence of national courts. Consequently, the Respondent urged the Court to dismiss the case in its entirety.

Court’s Findings
The Court noted that:
· The Applicants relied on Article 14 of the African Charter (ACHPR), Article 26 of the International Convention on Civil and Political Rights (ICCPR), the Berne Convention for Protection of Literary and Artistic Work and the World Intellectual Property Organisation (WIPO) Copyright Treaty as well as the Constitution of the Federal Republic of Nigeria.
· In accordance with Article 9(4) of its Supplementary Protocol, it could determine the matter as it relates to Article 14 of the ACHPR and Article 26 of the ICCPR but that the Berne Convention for Protection of Literary and Artistic Work and the World Intellectual Property Organisation (WIPO) Copyright Treaty were body of laws outside its areas of competence.
· The Applicants’ submissions under Sections 42 and 43 of the Constitution of Nigeria were understand as the Court lacks competence to examine laws of Member States or review decisions of national courts.
· The Application meets the requirements for admissibility under Article 10(d) of the Supplementary Protocol.
· The Applicants’ claims and evidence suggest a theft of their propriety interest which is a crime and not violation of right to property, and contrary to the civil character of the Court.
· The Applicants still possessed ownership of their software creation and no unlawful control has been exercised by the Respondent. Therefore, there was no breach of Article 14 of the ACHPR.
· On the right to equality under Article 26 of the ICCPR, the Applicants made no credible submissions.

Court Decision
The Court:
· Declared it had jurisdiction to determine the matter.
· Declared the matter was admissible in relation to Article 14 of the ACHPR and Article 26 of the ICCPR.
· Dismissed all claims for violations of rights including right to property and right to equality before the law.
· Ordered the Respondent to bear the costs.

Judicial Panel
The judgment was rendered by a panel comprising:
§ Hon. Justice Sengu Mohamed Koroma (Presiding Judge and Judge Rapporteur)
§ Hon. Justice Gberi-Bè Ouattara (Member)
§ Hon. Justice Edward Amoako Asante (Member)

ECOWAS Court Dismisses Claims of Property Rights Violation Initiated by Nigerian Software Developer

Continue Reading

News

This Is A Great Time To Invest In Nigeria, VP Shettina Tells Islamic Devt. Bank

Published

on

This Is A Great Time To Invest In Nigeria, VP Shettina Tells Islamic Devt. Bank

  • Says President Tinubu reforms creating conducive environment for investments

By: Our Reporter

The Vice President, Senator Kashim Shettima, has said it is currently a great time to invest in Nigeria, as the administration of President Bola Ahmed Tinubu has addressed most of the grey areas that hitherto served as disincentives to investors.

According to him, the foundation laid by the Renewed Hope administration through critical reforms in key sectors of the economy is creating the right environment for investments in Nigeria.

The Vice President stated this on Tuesday when he received on a courtesy visit to the Presidential Villa, a delegation from the Islamic Development Bank (IsDB) led by the Head of its Regional Hub, Mr Hammad Hundal.

“It is an exciting opportunity to invest in Nigeria. The administration of President Bola Ahmed Tinubu has created the enabling environment and is still doing so by addressing most of the grey areas that hitherto served as a disincentive. So, this is a great time to invest in Nigeria,” he said.

Senator Shettima pointed out that with well-thought-out interventions in human capital development, nutrition, agriculture, health, education and promotion of digital trade, the administration has demonstrated commitment in addressing challenges in the critical sectors.

“This administration is poised to address the challenges that we have in key areas of human capital development, financial inclusion, infrastructure and nutrition. In fact, we have no option but to address most of these issues, and we will continue to act in the right direction,” he maintained.

The Vice President applauded Nigeria’s partnership with the Islamic Development Bank, noting that both entities are based primarily on the country’s national interest.

He urged IsDB to continue on the path already laid through its support for key government programmes such as the Special Agro-Processing Zones (SAPZ) programme, the i-DICE project and other initiatives, including the development of a Halal economy in the country.

He continued: “Let us cross-pollinate ideas and come up with a design for your Country Engagement Framework (CEF). I want you to record in your Country Engagement Framework, the development of a Halal economy, promotion of digital trade, financial inclusion and other areas. I urge closer collaboration to enable us to address some of these challenges.”

Senator Shettima further noted that the bank’s programmes in Nigeria aligned with the Renewed Hope Agenda of President Tinubu across different sectors.

He called for improved support from the bank in areas of agriculture, human capital development, gender inclusion, investment in education and health infrastructure, and nutrition.

Earlier in his remarks, the IsDB’s head of regional hub in Abuja, Mr Hundal, said the bank was committed to scaling up its intervention through a holistic review of its Country Engagement Framework (CEF) in Nigeria to prioritise key aspects of the agenda of President Tinubu.

He identified key areas of its intervention in the country, including economic infrastructure, support for the private sector, energy security, and the i-DICE programme.

The highpoint of the meeting was the presentation of the bank’s Country Engagement Framework (CEF) to the Vice President by its Country Economist, Dr Obioma Asuzu.

The CEF highlights key broad strategic objectives of boosting recovery, tackling poverty and building resilience, and driving green economic growth.

She said the IsDB CEF for Nigeria is driven by the country’s national priorities, partnerships with critical stakeholders, and resource mobilisation.

This Is A Great Time To Invest In Nigeria, VP Shettina Tells Islamic Devt. Bank

Continue Reading

Trending

Verified by MonsterInsights