Connect with us

Feature

“Freedom of the Press and the Portrayal of Women in the Media”

Published

on

“Freedom of the Press and the Portrayal of Women in the Media”

By : Atifete Jahjaga

Dear Mr. Orav,
Dear Mr. Fontana,
Dear journalists and media professionals from all over the world present here today,
Ladies and Gentlemen,
Dear all,

Freedom of the media and the safety of journalists are essential in societies that want to prosper, aspire to be just and to be guided by accountability. Their work is essential. It has been such in Kosovo’s not so short tradition of media pluralism that has defined our republic’s making and even now when we find ourselves as the only country in Europe that no longer has a printed newspaper.

We are well aware and we should be reminded every day that Democracy has no chance to survive and no ability to thrive in information darkness. We have lived in one and we will never go back there again. A free and thriving press is a value – one of the greatest values I may argue – and we need strong willed, responsible journalists and editors in the newsrooms as we forge Kosovo’s way forward. They need to remind us of who we are and who we are committed to be and hold us to account every single day of how we are measuring up to our goal of being a free and fair country to all that call Kosovo their home. They need to inform the public of promises kept and promised unkept.

Media not only creates social and national cohesion by helping build a sense of community, as Benedict Anderson so diligently described in The Imagined Communities, but it also sets an agenda of priorities, big and small, that come to construct our public engagement mosaic and define our roles and responsibilities.

And here in lies the challenge. Given this enormous expectation that the public vests on media and journalists, this enormous power to keep institutions and all entities honest, it is just as essential for media to live up to their duty to serve the public’s right to know and to foster a fact-based conversation that keeps the institutions and the citizens at the receiving end of the decision-making engaged and responsible.

While this may have been a more straightforward matter in times of national tormet, during the Kosovo war, since its liberation Kosovo, like many democracies, has struggled to define these roles and responsibilities. We have seen institutions, both local and international, limit media’s access to information. We have seen them use and misuse national interest as a way to limit transparency, accountability and the public’s right to know. And we have seen that it has damaged all parties involved – it has weakened the political processes that are key to Kosovo’s future, it has shaken the trust in media and it has undermined the democratic progress.

In my public engagement, I too have stumbled upon challenges and I have had my share of frustrations, especially with the ways media characterized my presidency and how my gender became a target. Sometimes it felt personal, but most times I worried about the repercussions it will have on the general portrayal of women in public office and the discouragement that comes with it.

We need to do our outmost ro ensure the freedom of the media for it is essential, so that the information it disseminates is fact-based and reliable, so no hand or power should affect or try to affect the dignity of this institution. When I talk about the pressfreedom, I also emphasize their moral, professional and legal obligation to provide reliable news, deep and qualitative analysis, and especially the immediate avoidance and elimination of gender and sexist prejudices against all women who are part of public life.
The portrayal of women belonging to public professions by the media is an area that requires our attention but also our criticism, focused on big and significant changes, despite the positive changes in some aspects of the functioning of the media, this area we can say that still leaves a lot to be desired for further improvements.
As the first female president of Kosovo, I faced unique challenges in how the media portrayed my leadership. Local media coverage often focused more on my gender, my appearance, my private life than my policies. When I stop and reflect on my tenure, I cannot ignore the unfair and unprofessional treatment I have received from the media, and all of this treatment has come as a result of my gender identity, being a woman, and the President, for someone it was too much. Despite my dedication and raising the state of Kosovo to high pedestals, the country’s media focused on other aspects, such as my appearance or wardrobe.

The media’s portrayal of women often reinforces stereotypes, affecting public perception and limiting women’s roles in politics and society. This not only undermines women’s contributions but also perpetuates a culture of discrimination. It’s crucial to address these biases to foster an inclusive society.

For my part, I learned to engage with the media strategically, using interviews and press conferences to amplify my message while advocating for more balanced coverage of women in leadership, something that I try to do to this day.

Dear all,

To understand better this current state of affairs, we need to identify the challenges that the media face, and their struggles are many. Not only have media faced unprecedented challenges with the rise of social media and lately AI, which require them to constantly change and adapt to an ever shifting environment of wants and needs, but they are often a function of a market competition that is outside of their control.
Yes, indeed, we often think of media as a public service, a right and a good which ensures that every citizen is informed if she or he chooses to, but in a free and open market, media are dependent on business models that could make them susceptible to influences that in the long-term undermine their objectivity, their impartiality and eventually the public’s trust.

Some of these forces don’t have immediate fixes. They are part of a longer chain of events interlinked and interdependent that are tied to our ability to create stable economies and strong democracies that withstand the earthquakes of today’s rapidly changing world.
But what we can do is to ensure that we – institutions, civil society and the public – do our outmost to ensure the freedom of the media, for it is essential, so that the information it disseminates is fact-based and reliable, so no hand or power should affect or try to affect the dignity of this powerful and key estate.
When I talk about the pressfreedom, I also emphasize their moral, professional and legal obligation to provide reliable news, deep and qualitative analysis, and especially the immediate avoidance and elimination of gender and sexist prejudices against all women who are part of public life.
Dear,

We are living in the time of clicks, everything revolves around the number of clicks a news story gets, without worrying about its authenticity or analysis, it is enough to publish it quickly, with a bombastic headline and a picture that will attract readers to click on the news, but what that text contains is not important at all.

There are many reasons why such a thing happens, but the most important is the financing. Many media have serious economic problems, so they compete with each other as to who will publish the news first, without worrying about its content as well as professional and human ethics.
Disinformation, hyperbolization of events, and the apparent decline in the quality of work are unfortunately characterizing journalism in Kosovo and beyond, and this is quite worrying.

Yet I am optimistic for the fact that Kosovo enjoys a media pluralism with a variety of voices and figures heard on television, radio and other online platforms, which are owned by different entities, allowing room for independent reporting and a diversity of viewpoints.

But unfortunately the political polarization and politicization has affected every field, profession, and person, so even the media have not been immune to this challenge.

But there is one essential element to anchor us through all this. In a democracy, it is essential that every power be independent of each other, no one should try to extend force or influence in any sphere that falls outside its responsibility.
In order to preserve their educational and sensitizing role, the media should be allowed to exercise their profession and their role unhindered. For its part, the media should also be committed to an ethical standard so that the dignity of each and everyone is preserved.
We all need to better ourselves – Institutions need to become more transparent and let media do their job. Media executives should do some soul-searching about their impact on the fabric of the society and perhaps rethink how they themselves could agree to hold themselves to an account through stronger self-regulation to ensure equitable representation and to challenge harmful narratives. In an increasingly globalized world, Kosovo faces significant challenges from foreign entities attempting to manipulate public opinion and destabilize its young democracy. It is essential to educate the public about recognizing misinformation and understanding the sources of their information. Supporting independent journalism and promoting fact-based reporting is vital in building resilience against external narratives that threaten our democratic values.
It’s crucial for all stakeholders-government, civil society, and the media-to work together to safeguard our democratic institutions. Encouraging transparency in media ownership and funding sources can help combat the influence of foreign actors seeking to disrupt our democracy. Engaging citizens in dialogue about their rights and the importance of informed decision-making is essential for a robust democratic process. I remain committed to advocating for gender equality in media and politics while ensuring that Kosovo’s democracy is safeguarded against external threats. Together, we can build a stronger, more inclusive society.
Dear,
I am more than aware of the fast flow of time and life nowadays, everything is commercialized, but I am also convinced that we still have people who do their work with dignity and do not allow anything to touch the sanctity of their work, as every work is valuable. There are many issues that must be raised, many things that must be eliminated so that we all feel safe to speak, work and act freely in our country, without fear of who and what will write about us. Truths are always welcome, but blackmail, fake news and infringement of privacy are a line we should pledge not to cross.

Strongly advocating for the freedom of the media, their protection by law, as well as not violating the identity of the media and all professionals in this field, as well as for a quality, educational and informative work of the media, I also want to convey this message:
Dear Media,
You have the opportunity to bring the whole world together, you are one of the fastest and most important connectors today, you have the power to do great things, so please use this opportunity with honesty and dignity, with dedication and work tireless. There is nothing more important than being the eyes, ears and voice of the people, and you are, you have been given and have earned this opportunity, so that there is as little hesitation, threats and interference in your work as possible, let law, work ethic and professionalism be your guide.

Let me repeat it again: we should be reminded every day that Democracy has no chance to survive and no ability to thrive in darkness. We need a free and thriving press and we need strong willed, responsible journalists and editors in the newsrooms as we forge Kosovo’s way forward. They need to remind us of who we are and who we are committed to be.
Atifete Jahjaga, is the first Kosovo’s Female President.

“Freedom of the Press and the Portrayal of Women in the Media”

Continue Reading
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Feature

The Satellite That Refused to Stand Still: Why Nigeria’s Space Asset Is Finally Coming Into Its Own

Published

on

The Satellite That Refused to Stand Still: Why Nigeria’s Space Asset Is Finally Coming Into Its Own

By Danjuma Amodu

For more than a decade, Nigeria has occupied a unique but under-celebrated position in Africa’s digital story. Since 2011, the country has operated its own communications satellite—an achievement few nations on the continent can claim. It placed Nigeria in a select league of countries with sovereign space-based communications infrastructure, a strategic asset capable of shaping everything from national security to broadband access. Yet for years, that satellite seemed to orbit in quiet contradiction: full of promise, but only partially woven into the fabric of everyday Nigerian life.

That contradiction is now being challenged.

When Jane Nkechi Egerton-Idehen assumed leadership of Nigerian Communications Satellite Limited in 2023, she stepped into an institution that reflected a broader pattern in Nigeria’s public infrastructure—significant capital investment without corresponding utilisation. The satellite’s broadcasting capacity was underused, its broadband services had lost commercial traction, and the organisation leaned heavily on government patronage. In a country where millions remained unconnected, the gap between capability and impact was glaring.

Her arrival coincided with a policy shift under President Bola Ahmed Tinubu, whose Renewed Hope Agenda placed digital infrastructure at the centre of economic transformation. That alignment of leadership and national policy created a narrow but critical window: the chance to reposition satellite technology not as a technical luxury, but as foundational infrastructure.

To understand the significance of what has followed, it is important to situate Nigeria’s satellite programme within a broader historical and economic context. Nigeria’s space ambitions date back to the early 2000s, driven by a recognition that terrestrial infrastructure alone could not solve the country’s connectivity challenges. Vast rural expanses, difficult terrain, and the high cost of fibre deployment meant that millions would remain excluded unless alternative technologies were deployed. Satellite offered that alternative—capable of reaching the unreached, connecting the disconnected, and doing so at scale.

But infrastructure, by itself, does not guarantee impact. It requires strategy, partnerships, and, crucially, a market.

What has changed in the past two years is not the satellite itself, but how it is being positioned. Under Egerton-Idehen’s leadership, NIGCOMSAT has shifted from a largely government-facing agency to a more commercially aware and partnership-driven enterprise. The expansion of television channels on its platform—from 45 to 150—and the growth of its audience from 2 million to 7 million Nigerians are not just statistics; they represent a deliberate effort to maximise existing capacity and prove relevance in a competitive media landscape.

Equally important is the organisation’s role in Nigeria’s Digital Switch Over, executed in partnership with the National Broadcasting Commission. For years, the transition from analogue to digital broadcasting has been slow and uneven. Satellite infrastructure, with its wide coverage and reliability, provides the backbone needed to accelerate that transition. In this sense, NIGCOMSAT is not merely a participant but an enabler of a long-delayed national reform.

Perhaps the most consequential shift, however, lies in connectivity. Nigeria’s digital divide is not just a technological issue; it is an economic and social fault line. Urban centres continue to attract investment in fibre and mobile networks, while rural communities remain underserved because the business case for traditional infrastructure is weak. By partnering with companies such as MTN Nigeria and IHS Towers, NIGCOMSAT is positioning satellite as a complementary layer—extending coverage to places where cables cannot easily go.

This has real-world implications. It means a rural clinic can access telemedicine services. It means a school in a remote community can connect to digital learning platforms. It means security agencies, including the Nigerian Navy, can maintain communication in environments where terrestrial networks fail. These are not abstract gains; they are practical interventions in some of Nigeria’s most persistent development challenges.

The introduction of the NIGCOMSAT Accelerator Programme in 2024 adds another dimension to this transformation. Historically, space infrastructure in many countries has been treated as a closed system—owned and operated by government, with limited avenues for private sector innovation. By opening access to startups, NIGCOMSAT is effectively democratising its infrastructure, allowing entrepreneurs to build solutions on top of it.

The significance of this cannot be overstated. More than 80 startups have already passed through the programme, developing applications that range from security-focused drone systems to healthcare connectivity platforms. The example of rural hospitals being linked through VSAT technology illustrates a broader point: when infrastructure becomes accessible, innovation follows. By training over 500 young Nigerians—many of them women—the programme is also investing in human capital, ensuring that the country is not just a consumer of technology, but a creator.

At the policy level, voices like Bosun Tijani have reinforced the strategic importance of satellite technology. His assertion that satellite systems sit at the centre of global digital transformation reflects a growing consensus: connectivity is no longer optional; it is foundational. In this context, Nigeria’s status as the only West African country with its own communications satellite is not just a point of pride—it is a strategic advantage that must be fully leveraged.

That advantage is set to deepen with the planned launch of NigComSat-2A and NigComSat-2B, approved by the federal government and scheduled for 2028 and 2029. These satellites will expand capacity, improve redundancy, and position Nigeria to meet growing demand for broadband and digital services. More importantly, they signal continuity—a recognition that space infrastructure is not a one-off investment, but a long-term commitment.

Yet, even as progress is evident, it would be premature to declare victory. Challenges remain. The sustainability of commercial gains, competition from global satellite providers, regulatory bottlenecks, and the broader economic environment will all shape the trajectory of NIGCOMSAT’s transformation. The real test will be whether these early gains can be consolidated into a durable, self-sustaining model that continues to deliver value beyond government support.

Still, there is a clear shift underway. For years, Nigeria’s satellite story was one of quiet existence—present, functional, but largely peripheral to the national conversation. Today, it is becoming central to discussions about connectivity, innovation, and economic inclusion.

Egerton-Idehen captured this vision succinctly when she framed investment in space as an investment in education, healthcare, security, and commerce. That framing matters because it reframes the narrative: from space as a distant, technical domain to space as a practical tool for development.

In the end, the story of Nigeria’s satellite is not just about technology. It is about utilisation, leadership, and the ability to translate infrastructure into impact. After years of circling with untapped potential, the satellite that once seemed content to stand still is now moving—steadily, deliberately—into the centre of Nigeria’s development agenda.

Danjuma Amodu is a journalist and public analyst based in Abuja. He writes on governance, digital infrastructure, and public policy.

The Satellite That Refused to Stand Still: Why Nigeria’s Space Asset Is Finally Coming Into Its Own

Continue Reading

Feature

Amupiutated – In Touch, The Nation newspaper

Published

on

Amupiutated – In Touch, The Nation newspaper

By Sam Omatseye

The man in the nightmare of Atiku, Mark, Aregbesola and company must be one Nafiu Gombe. He was a sore thumb on creation day. That is, when the rains started to beat the coalition. He did not resign. No one has asked what the fellows in the Ralph Nwosu-led executive took from the army of occupation that Gombe did not get. They did not drop out for nothing. ADC was not formed for charity. It was no virgin asking for a rapist. The coalition of the wounded gave something. We want to know why and what.

We should also know why Gombe has not flinched. Did he get the offer and look the other way? Was he not ready to succumb for the cheap. What was the scale and character of the settlement?

Many media folks and reporters love the ADC folks too much to expose them? Maybe the few reporters and editors who want the truth ought to dig and soil their shovels. In Warri, in my boyhood years, we delighted in the phrase, “cheap article dey run belle.” It simply means, if you prefer to buy infested piece of food because it is cheap, a running stomach awaits you. ADC is in the belly of storm.

The ADC folks did not want to do the work of forming a political party. They settled for the aje butter formula. They want what is easy instead of what is true. They did not want to sweat, wait, get bruised, stumble and follow the narrow path. When they tried, they formed ADA. It sounded like a sister’s name. Then they learned it was a copycat. They did not know how to even name a party. So, they wanted a soup already cooked. Now they are having running stomach and they are blaming someone else who spent all day in the kitchen deploying heat and ingredients. What ADC has done is what Eleyinmi in Village Headmaster will call “nonsense and ingredients.”

Let us have some language lesson with the word ante bellum. It is latin, and we know lawyers have afflicted themselves with that ancient language. So, we can start with ante, and it means ‘before,’ ‘in front of’ or ‘prior to.’ Bellum means war or warfare. INEC chair Prof. Joash Amupitan has cleared the fog in his interview with Arise TV anchor Reuben Abati.

The folks in the ADC and their television lawyers are alien to this fact. When the Court of Appeal says the factions should revert to the status quo ante bellum, it means before the war in the ADC. So, when did the war in the ADC begin? Was it not when David Mark and his disciples browbeat the party executive to stand down? They did not resign a bloc. There is no constitutional recognition of group abdication. They did as individuals. Their trouble is with Gomb, who says it is his emilokan moment to be the party chairman.

ADC says he resigned. He said he did not. ADC is circulating what looks like a letter. It reads like a form. Did the ADC produce a stock letter for resignation whereby a person fills his name like a form? Everyone resigns for different reasons. But the letter in circulation looks like one written as though everyone must sign with the same reason and the same language. Even the handwriting in the same so-called letter is not consistent with a conflict of cursive and straight penmanship. Again, the letter was sent to INEC about four months after his purported resignation. Mariama Ba wrote a work titled: So Long a Letter. For ADC, so long a letter travels. We want to know if the ADC has the audacity to tender a forged letter in court; if, that is, Gombe’s denial is right. It will be defending a crime with a crime. It is also called double jeopardy. Fela would call it deady body get accident… Deady body break bone..Na double wahala for deady body and the owner of deady body.

The subplot of this drama is a battle of memory. Are they trying to play with the remembrance of things past, apologies to Marcel Proust. It is not like Proust which happened a long time ago. This is just months. Or is it like when Shakespeare says that they are making “a sinner of memory to credit a lie.”?

So, ante bellum means before that moment when the hostilities fomented, and it means before Mark was installed. Gombe never accepted Mark, and he believes he (Gombe)is the authentic chairman. That makes, in his lights, Mark a usurper.

Because the ADC folks are no respecters of the law, they have vowed to conduct their conventions and congresses, even though the court warned against any act on both sides. It means the folks are not serious. One Chidi Odinkalu said the professor – and Chidi is nowhere near a professor – who is INEC chair should not interpret the court verdict. A hollow man indeed he is. He wants Amupitan to go seek legal clarification in court. I know Chidi and his folks cannot write a manifesto yet, but who stops him and his ADC from going to court to seek same?

They cannot form a party. They cannot take over a party. They cannot settle everyone. They cannot interpret a court decision. They cannot write a manifesto as yet. They cannot obey court order. They are busy playing a club of political retirees without knowing it. They even have representatives abroad. Maybe they should ask for that task one of their stars, Rabiu Kwakwanso, who has been barred for terror reasons from the United States. He, too, should go to the Hague. Chidi should be his attorney for top dollar. ADC can pay.

They see themselves in ADC as a kaleidoscope of our politics. ADC glitters but no gold. Real gold takes a lot of digging. They should ask the president how he did his work. Some of the ADC men like Rauf know it.

Tinubu started his work years ago, and his political career in this republic began with the Alliance for Democracy. He did not found it but he ran from its grassroots to be governor. Just like his tour as president, he started with crisis. He did not cry. Rather he tackled the foes. One group was the elders of the Afenifere who wanted to lord it over him. They wanted to make him a marionette. They tried to impose Ganiyu Dawodu, who almost purloined his victory for Funsho Williams. He did not cry but worked within the party to get it back. They wanted to control Tinubu, his policies, his appointees. He defeated them. The trojan Babatunde Raji Fashola (SAN), who was Tinubu’s chief of staff tells for my upcoming book an incident when he banged the table in his office about not ceding an inch to them. The other battle was with Obasanjo, who planted spies and worms in the AD, wanted to weaken the party for the 2007 polls, a story told with Pathos by Olawale Oshun in his book The Kiss of Death. Tinubu did not cry like ADC about OBJ trying to kill his party. Neither did he compromise. He manoeuvred and blindsided and ambushed the general by forming the Action Congress. The stealth and imagination that led to the formation of AC reads like the story of witchcraft. But the details must not be unveiled here until my book tells it blow by blow. It was a political thriller. Even OBJ cannot tell it in public to save his ego. And some of those who took part in the scheme did not know who was pulling the strings and why. In an interview with one of them, he confessed, “But I was not aware.”

Yet, in the 2003 elections, when other states fell in the Southwest to the OBJ shenanigans, Lagos State was left unscathed. How did Tinubu ride the Tiger to his destination and the tiger was thankful and only growled away. Both beast and rider waved goodbye. He was going to beat the tiger later and reinforce the image of the last man standing.

Even if OBJ did sweep the Southwest states for his men, the same Tinubu did not weep. He went to work and the states, Edo, Oyo, Ogun, Osun, Ekiti, Ondo, all became progressives. In a famous Fashola line, they came back “one by one by God.”

After that, Tinubu pitched for the centre. No one can doubt that he was the architect and spirit behind the fall of PDP with Jonathan’s ouster. In one sweep, he redeemed Buhari and ended what was dreamed as a dynasty for 60 years.

Emilokan and Olule came as a war cry from Abeokuta. He beat his party leaders. Not strange to him. He did that in Lagos with Afenifere. He had said in Yoruba that they who wanted to scuttle his ambition with fuel and currency scarcity did not know the way home. The rest is history.

The ADC folks are crying because Amupitan obeyed the law. They were Amupiutated and they are crying. No legs to kick and hands to blow. The Supreme Court has not ruled, yet they are taking the laws into their hands. They plan to scare us by catastrophising the situation. They are imagining hell because they have no power to fight. They boasted over FCT polls that it would be bellwether of their popularity. How hard they fell.

As the cliché goes, you cannot make an omelette without breaking an egg. They want it served hot. It invokes Herman Melville’s classic novel Moby Dick where an ambitious amputee captain goes to sea to avenge of a white whale.

Amupiutated – In Touch, The Nation newspaper

Continue Reading

Feature

General Chris Musa, Hi-tech Fencing of Nigerian Porous Borders and the Foolish Pride of Sowore

Published

on

General Chris Musa, Hi-tech Fencing of Nigerian Porous Borders and the Foolish Pride of Sowore

By: Bodunrin Kayode

This is like a distraction to my daily routine in Maiduguri but there was no way my binoculars could miss the recent unnecessary rant of Yele Sowore who dared to demonize one of the warriors of the “hadin kai” theatre General Chris Musa by calling him a “foolish” man simply because he rightly suggested that we need a fence to protect residents from our known and unknown enemies. A high tech fence that can even compete with what the Israelis have against their known enemies. I told myself I had to leave whatever I was doing to defend the General and the Borno people. And to correct the ignorant impression he has painted with such misplaced comments.

Reading such despicable bile coming from someone who is not in touch with the trauma of Borno residents and has never visited even the capital city of Maiduguri spells volume about a man who wants to be the Commander in Chief of the armed forces yet so ignorant about Nigeria. He sounded so daft in his presentation that one begins to wonder if indeed he was educated as he claims to be. He actually spoke as if he was paid to do so because nothing happens in the vacuum in Nigeria these days.

You are very wrong Yele

Let me educate him on why this fence will help our war Commanders in the operation Hadin Kai especially if the contract would be given to military engineers who will build with one hand and handle weapons for protecting themselves with the other hand. This is because no civilian contractor will be safe enough to take such a big risk meant to stop insurgents to cross cross as they will.

Borno is the only State sharing massive borders with three African countries. Chad, Niger and Cameroon. That places the State in a very critical situation when it comes to the management of intelligence and warding off the criminals related to the 16 year old lingering insurgency war. It puts our Intel agencies at a vulnerable defensive state rather than proactive position of strength to help the military.

And indeed, like several other countries have done to protect their people, hi-tech fences were built with sentry towers to ward off external aggressors. In our case, those enemies of state who will get to terrorist cells in Libya, Mauritania and even the Magreb region to train and return with standby mercenaries to kill, steal and destroy the existence of our people. They have been doing it since 2009 and will not stop till General Chris Musa succeeds in positioning a memo that will sail through the national executive council for the first phase of the fence building spree to commence.

I watched Sowore vomit so much gibberish recently about General Chris Musa that i wonder if he knows that he can never rival the pedigree of the Minister of defence. He should equally know that he is just a confused brat in terms of pedigree compared to the towering image General Musa has built for himself. Sowore therefore is not qualified to de-market the Minister for any reason at all under the sun. He is rather the “foolish” one using his language, that needs to apologize to Gen Musa for talking out of point. How much will it cost to build the Israeli type of fence even if we must get it from the stolen commonwealth EFCC and ICPC are recouping daily for government?

Yele’s lack of focus and failed Presidential ambitions

Sometimes I wonder if we as Africans don’t believe in reverencing our role models rather than spending time firing arrows of the Pull Him Down syndrome (PHD) against them out of foolish pride and envy. That Yele contested for the position of President on the platform of an obscure party does not mean he is qualified to hold the political position of councillor even in his state Ondo. He should go start at the level of councillor to see how acceptable he is before daring to want to be our Commander in Chief which he will never get.

He even had the audacity to call General Musa “foolish man”. I don’t blame him, its because talk is always free in Nigeria. If not, that people like him give unnecessary importance to themselves even without electoral value who would have known him even as an ordinary ilaje boy. How on earth do you demonize a man who is fighting to save his country from eminent collapse so we do not have a repeat of what happened in Afghanistan here. A situation where after a long generational fight of asymmetric warfare, the Americans had to leave the county for their very enemies, the Taliban to take over the reigns of government.
I used to think Omoyele had some grits around his persona but it is obvious he is just a confused empty barrel fit for the noise he makes around himself.

Sowore who has never held a political position in his life should know that right thinking people in Nigeria do not take him serious because of the lack of focus in his pattern of activism. I wonder why anyone would think building a fence like other countries faced with terrorism is a stupid idea when he has not come to Borno for an informed survey on the matter. Sowore has really touched the raw nerve of Borno people by de-marketing an actionable idea which most of the informed residents here think will make sense. How foolish he looks now!

Yes Borno needs a hi-tech fence with all the sophistication of technology we can get

You really need to be in Borno state to understand why President Tinubu must build a fence to restrict infiltration of criminals into the country. For as long as there is a sahelian insurgency going on in Mali and Libya, we really need to build that fence as quickly as possible. Mali alone has a coalition of two groups liked to ISis and Al-qaeda while Libya is equally polluted because they have a massive power vacuum created after the death of Gaddafi. From Mali, fighters are passed through Niger into our territory.
For the information of Yele, Saudi Arabia built a fence to stop Iran long time ago from having incursions into their territory and today they can sleep with their two eyes closed. The Saudi Kingdom started the 900km fence against terrorists from Iran in 2014 and are trying to fence the entire country against extremists bent on bringing them to their knees. Pakistan equally has a 2,600 km fence with Afghanistan to prevent smuggling and religious extremism caused by incursions. Many countries with similar challenges are thinking about it so why should Nigeria be different? At least 40 countries have constructed security fences around their borders to avoid extremists infiltrating into their communities since 9/11. America isn’t exempted either.

So what is Sowore talking about? As far as I am concerned , he does not live in Borno and is not qualified to know what is biting the residents on ground. Someone should tell Sowore to stop that foolish rant he started against a solid professional like Minister Musa because it is an unsellable and unwinnable campaign. The proposed fence will generate over 5000 jobs and we in Borno are waiting for it.

Bodunrin Kayode writes in from Maiduguri

General Chris Musa, Hi-tech Fencing of Nigerian Porous Borders and the Foolish Pride of Sowore

Continue Reading

Trending

Verified by MonsterInsights