Northeast
Governor Mala gets more votes from Yobe south senatorial district – Damagum

Governor Mala gets more votes from Yobe south senatorial district – Damagum
By: Yahaya Wakili
The Acting Public Relation Officer (PRO) of the All Progressive Congress (APC) Yobe state chapter, Alhaji Ibrahim Daushe Damagum has said that 75% of the people who vote Governor Mai Mala Buni are from Yobe South Senatorial district (Zone B).
Alhaji Ibrahim Daushe Damagum who is also the Chairman Hausa/Fulani Association zone B as well as stakeholders Fune local government started this in Damagum while answering questions from the Newsmen.
” Governor Mai Mala Buni is my mentor for over thirty years and if you conducted the first election if you didn’t face the challenges you will not knowing the irrigularities to correct it.” Daushe said.
He revealed that, in the past four years of administration of Governor Mai Mala Buni in Yobe state, he try his best because people were surprised with his little age and he come one time nobody expect that he will perform well but he perform very excellent.
Alhaji Ibrahim Daushe Damagum maintained that, governor Mai Mala Buni is lucky he got the people of Yobe state loves him and he too he love them and they conducted the election at the same time he won the election in 2019 and he formed the government hundred percent successfully.
“In reality in Yobe state we have a kind of people that they will show you they know everything, they know better than you and Governor Mai Mala Buni is a very simple person if you come with your request he will not say no and he don’t want to chit any body that is why because of his simplicity even some people said let us do anty party what will happen and they did it and nothing happened to them.” The PRO said.
“Because they know Governor Mai Mala Buni is a person who can not talk, infact my fear is in 2027. In 2027 inshallah we and him we are going to struggle to bring a competent person who will replace him as governor of Yobe state under our great party Apc to me is better now to screen those who are saying that we are together but there are sabotaging us.
“25th February, elections has shocked us in Yobe state and this sabotuers are in the government the governor knows them but God knows that the heart of the governor and ours is clean so in the March election God help us we won the election but there is something wrong going round.” he added.
The Chairman Hausa/Fulani further revealed that, there are some big men who are holding a big position in the government but the votes come from their areas didn’t martch with the position there are occupied in the government.
Alhaji Ibrahim Daushe Damagum maintained that there are some people who surrounding the governor and they don’t want any body to come close to him and there are not helping him there are only chitting him, this people there are even follow him to Abuja, to Damaturu and even to Saudi Arabia.
Therefore, this time around when he constituted his new government, we would sit down with him and advice him to flush out this unpatriotic elements that surrounding him.
Governor Mala gets more votes from Yobe south senatorial district – Damagum
Northeast
Harassment of Muslim Women in Maiduguri Hospitals: An Assertion Amidst an Alarming Increase in Terrorist Activities in Nigeria’s Northeastern Region.

Harassment of Muslim Women in Maiduguri Hospitals: An Assertion Amidst an Alarming Increase in Terrorist Activities in Nigeria’s Northeastern Region.
By: Dr. James Bwala
The recent allegations made by the Muslim Rights Concern (MURIC), led by its director, Professor Ishaq Akintola, claim that security checks imposed on Muslim women trying to access certain hospitals in Maiduguri constitute harassment. This assertion comes amidst an alarming increase in terrorist activities in Nigeria’s northeastern region, particularly in Maiduguri, which has seen a resurgence in violence and attacks.
While the intention behind these security measures is ostensibly to protect patients and healthcare providers from potential threats, the implications of these allegations deserve critical analysis. Indeed, the tensions between security measures meant to safeguard communities and the potential for such measures to be perceived as discrimination or harassment may have revealed that MURIC’s claims are inadvertently an attempt to create vulnerabilities within the healthcare sector, particularly during a time when accessibility to medical facilities is crucial.
While I take a critical review of the statement by MURIC, I feel it is necessary to understand the broader context of security in Maiduguri. The city has been at the forefront of a prolonged conflict instigated by Boko Haram and other militant groups. The threat posed by these organizations has resulted in severe security protocols across various public domains, including hospitals. Security checks are designed to mitigate the risks associated with terrorist infiltration, ensuring that individuals entering sensitive areas, such as medical facilities, do not pose a security threat. However, these measures often require a delicate balance between maintaining safety and respecting the rights of individuals, particularly marginalized groups such as women and religious minorities.
MURIC’s allegations highlight the perception of bias against Muslim women who may feel unfairly targeted by security checks resembling racial or religious profiling. The notion that specific demographic features can lead to increased scrutiny and inconvenience raises ethical questions about fairness and equity within security protocols. Security personnel must be trained to conduct their duties without prejudice, ensuring that all individuals receive equitable treatment irrespective of their ethnicity, religion, or gender. Any failure to uphold these standards can exacerbate existing tensions and engender a sense of mistrust between the community and authorities.
In critiquing MURIC’s stance, it is essential to recognize the potential implications of their claims. While the organization seeks to advocate for the rights of Muslim women, their allegations could unintentionally offer cover for those with malicious intentions. If terrorists identified a chink in the security apparatus due to the controversial claims put forth by MURIC, they could exploit this situation to gain easier access to hospitals—or worse, perpetrate attacks there. The current security climate necessitates vigilance and strict adherence to procedures designed to thwart terrorist operations. Thus, the line between legitimate protest against perceived discrimination and enabling dangerous entities must be navigated with caution.
READ ALSO: https://newsng.ng/troops-neutralise-four-iswap-terrorists-rescue-two-hostages-in-gajiram/
Moreover, it is worthwhile to consider what constitutes harassment. For many, harassment alludes to actions that create an intimidating, hostile, or offensive environment. While security checks undoubtedly add a layer of inconvenience, especially for vulnerable groups such as women, they are enacted with the aim of preserving human life and preventing violence. It becomes vital to distinguish between legitimate security practices and systemic discrimination. It is also important to question whether MURIC’s framing of the situation is unproductive, potentially creating further divisions and conflicts within the community, rather than fostering dialogues aimed at constructive solutions.
In examining the responses of relevant stakeholders, state governments, and health authorities in the region, it is important to emphasize the need for comprehensive dialogue. Stakeholders must engage in discussions with community representatives, including organizations like MURIC, to explore the nuances surrounding security measures without dismissing legitimate concerns raised by citizens. Targeted conversations can pave the way for improved protocols that guarantee safety while minimizing the risk of perceived profiling and harassment.
Communication strategies play a significant role in alleviating tensions; thus, hospitals should transparently communicate the reasoning behind security protocols to educate the public. An effort should be made to explain the necessity of thorough checks and how these measures significantly contribute to a safer environment for everyone, regardless of background. Open dialogues can cultivate an atmosphere of trust and cooperation among residents, enhancing their participation in security efforts while addressing concerns voiced by organizations like MURIC.
READ ALSO:https://newsng.ng/why-governor-zulum-directs-immediate-investigation-into-murics-claims-of-hijab-harassment-in-maiduguri-hospitals/
Another critical factor in this critique revolves around the role of media in shaping perceptions of security and community relations. The media portrayal of MURIC’s allegations may amplify feelings of alienation and enmity within an already vulnerable population. A nuanced reporting strategy is essential to avoid sensationalism that either downplays serious security concerns or escalates tensions unnecessarily.
On a deep look at the situation, it is essential to propose recommendations for improving the current situation. First and foremost, any security checks implemented within healthcare facilities must prioritize sensitivity training for security personnel. By emphasizing respect and understanding of cultural practices, personnel can uphold public safety without compromising dignity. Additionally, establishing feedback mechanisms can allow individuals to report grievances related to their experiences during security checks, paving the way for continuous improvement.
Secondly, the collaboration between government bodies, law enforcement, and community organizations should be fortified to address collective security challenges. Joint initiatives such as community workshops focused on building understanding around security measures can aid in forging stronger community bonds.
While the allegations made by MURIC about the harassment of Muslim women during security checks must not be dismissed, they serve as a reminder of the delicate interplay between security and civil liberties. During a time of heightened risks from terrorism in Maiduguri, it is crucial to maintain vigilance and prioritize safety without compromising the rights and dignity of individuals. The focus should be on collaborative efforts that enhance security while fostering inclusivity and understanding. Only through meaningful dialogue can communities navigate the complexities of safeguarding lives and upholding the tenets of justice, equity, and respect.
* James Bwala, PhD, a security strategy analyst, writes from Abuja.
Harassment of Muslim Women in Maiduguri Hospitals: An Assertion Amidst an Alarming Increase in Terrorist Activities in Nigeria’s Northeastern Region.
News
Zulum Orders Immediate Investigation into MURIC’s Claims of Hijab Harassment in Maiduguri Hospitals

Zulum Orders Immediate Investigation into MURIC’s Claims of Hijab Harassment in Maiduguri Hospitals
By: Michael Mike
Borno State Governor, Prof. Babagana Zulum said he received with great concern a statement by the Muslim Rights Concern (MURIC) alleging the harassment of muslim women for wearing hijab in some hospitals in Maiduguri.
Zulum noted that while the government is not aware of any official report or complaint regarding such incidents, his administration has taken the allegations with utmost seriousness.
In a directive issued on Thursday through his spokesperson, Dauda Iliya, Zulum, ordered the Commissioner of Health and Human Services, Professor Baba Mallam Gana, to undertake an immediate and thorough investigation to ascertain the veracity of these claims.
The statement noted that Zulum reiterated his administration’s commitment to protecting all citizens’ religious rights and dignity, particularly that of women. He stated that Borno State, being a predominantly muslim society, holds hijab in high esteem and any form of harassment against those who choose to wear it, is unacceptable and will not be tolerated.
“The welfare and rights of our citizens, especially our mothers, wives, and daughters, are paramount. We have zero-tolerance for any form of discrimination or harassment. While we have no prior record of such complaints, we are not taking these allegations lightly. This investigation will be swift and transparent. If any wrongdoing is found, appropriate disciplinary action will be taken immediately,” Zulum assured.
The statement added that Zulum urges the public, and specifically individuals who have experienced such treatment, to come forward and assist in the investigation with credible information to ensure a fair and just outcome.
“I assure the public that, that Borno State government under my leadership will not tolerate any action that unjustly targets or humiliate any segment of our society,” he concludes.
Zulum Orders Immediate Investigation into MURIC’s Claims of Hijab Harassment in Maiduguri Hospitals
News
Adamawa Court fixes Nov. 3 for Furore Emirate case defense

Adamawa Court fixes Nov. 3 for Furore Emirate case defense
Adamawa State High Court IV sitting in Yola on Wednesday adjourned a case challenging the Adamawa government for the creation of the Fufore emirate council from Adamawa emirate to November 3rd and 4th for defense.
Justice Musa Usman who presided over the case said, this at the end of two days hearing from the principal witness, plaintiffs.
The case which was filed by the three traditional titles holders of Adamawa emirate; Alhaji Musa Halilu, Dujuma Adamawa, Mustapha Dahiru, Yarima Adamawa and Alhaji Mustapha Ahmadu, Sarki Noma Adamawa that due process was not followed before the creation of Fufore emirate.
Manga Nurudeen (SAN), counsel to the plaintiffs, told newsmen at the end of the seating that they had called four witnesses in the case and concluded.
“As you may have seen, the court has adjourned to 3rd and 4th of November for the defense, for the government and the new airmen to bring their own witnesses to be cross examined.
The defense counsel, state Attorney General and Commissioner of Justice, Afraimu Jingi, also said they have successfully taken the evidence of the plaintiffs during the two days of seating.
“They listed five witnesses they were able to call four and they closed their case.
“And fortunately we have been able to answer the questions to our mind that we thought we can discredit them to our mind which is left to the court to determine”, he said.
According to him, they were satisfied with the proceedings and they do not have any burden on them as the next agenda will be defense.
Adamawa Court fixes Nov. 3 for Furore Emirate case defense
-
News2 years ago
Roger Federer’s Shock as DNA Results Reveal Myla and Charlene Are Not His Biological Children
-
Opinions4 years ago
THE PLIGHT OF FARIDA
-
Opinions4 years ago
POLICE CHARGE ROOMS, A MINTING PRESS
-
News2 years ago
EYN: Rev. Billi, Distortion of History, and The Living Tamarind Tree
-
ACADEMICS2 years ago
A History of Biu” (2015) and The Lingering Bura-Pabir Question (1)
-
Columns2 years ago
Army University Biu: There is certain interest, but certainly not from Borno.
-
News6 months ago
FAILED COUP IN BURKINA FASO: HOW TRAORÉ NARROWLY ESCAPED ASSASSINATION PLOT AMID FOREIGN INTERFERENCE CLAIMS
-
Opinions2 years ago
Tinubu,Shettima: The epidemic of economic, insecurity in Nigeria