News
US Tightens Sanctions on Cuba, Targets Tourism Ministry in Fresh Pressure Campaign
US Tightens Sanctions on Cuba, Targets Tourism Ministry in Fresh Pressure Campaign
By: Michael Mike
The United States has expanded its sanctions against Cuba, targeting the country’s Ministry of Tourism and nine other state-linked entities in a fresh escalation of Washington’s decades-long economic pressure campaign against the Caribbean nation.
The latest measures, announced by the U.S. State Department, add 10 Cuban entities to Washington’s sanctions list, extending restrictions to organisations involved in tourism, fuel imports, exports and foreign trade operations. Among those sanctioned are ENETEC S.A., Coreydan S.A. and the Foreign Trade Business Group (GECOMEX), all of which play roles in Cuba’s international commercial and energy sectors.
The move marks another step in the Trump administration’s efforts to tighten economic restrictions on Havana, with the Ministry of Tourism—one of Cuba’s most important foreign exchange earners—becoming a key target. The sanctions were imposed under an executive order signed by President Donald Trump on May 1, broadening the administration’s authority to increase pressure on the Cuban government.
U.S. Secretary of State Marco Rubio said Washington would continue deploying economic and diplomatic measures as part of its policy toward Cuba, maintaining that the sanctions are intended to hold the Cuban government accountable.
The Cuban government, however, condemned the latest restrictions, describing them as an attempt to deepen the country’s economic crisis and intensify what it calls the U.S. economic, commercial and financial blockade that has been in place for more than six decades.
Havana argued that the new sanctions seek to discourage foreign companies and investors from doing business with Cuban state institutions, particularly those linked to strategic sectors such as tourism and energy.
The sanctions come at a time when Cuba is grappling with one of its worst economic crises in decades, characterised by persistent shortages of fuel, electricity, food and medicines, soaring inflation and a wave of outward migration. Cuban authorities have consistently blamed the U.S. embargo for worsening the country’s economic hardship, while Washington argues that Cuba’s centrally planned economy and government policies are primarily responsible for the crisis.
The latest U.S. action also follows renewed international criticism of the embargo at the United Nations. Earlier this month, the UN General Assembly overwhelmingly adopted a resolution calling for an end to the U.S. embargo against Cuba, with 136 member states voting in favour, nine—including the United States and Israel—voting against, and 30 abstaining.
The General Assembly has adopted similar resolutions annually for more than three decades, reflecting broad international opposition to the embargo. Although the resolutions are not legally binding, they have consistently underscored the diplomatic isolation of the United States on the issue.
Relations between Washington and Havana have remained tense since the United States imposed sweeping sanctions following the 1959 Cuban Revolution led by Fidel Castro. While some restrictions were eased during the Barack Obama administration, relations deteriorated again under President Donald Trump, who reinstated and expanded sanctions aimed at limiting Cuba’s access to foreign currency and international financing.
The Biden administration retained many of those restrictions, and Trump’s return to office has been accompanied by a renewed commitment to intensify pressure on Havana.
Cuban officials warned that the expanded sanctions would further strain the country’s fragile economy and increase hardship for ordinary citizens, accusing Washington of pursuing a policy designed to force political change on the island. The United States has consistently rejected that characterization, insisting that its sanctions are aimed at the Cuban government and entities linked to it rather than the Cuban people.
The latest measures are expected to further complicate Cuba’s efforts to attract foreign investment and revive its tourism industry, one of the country’s principal sources of revenue as it struggles to recover from years of economic contraction and declining international visitor arrivals.
US Tightens Sanctions on Cuba, Targets Tourism Ministry in Fresh Pressure Campaign
News
Troops Rescue Injured Farmer, Seize 27 Cattle After Violent Herders’ Attacks in Plateau
Troops Rescue Injured Farmer, Seize 27 Cattle After Violent Herders’ Attacks in Plateau
By Zagazola Makama
Troops of Sector 8, Operation Enduring Peace have rescued an injured farmer and confiscated 27 cattle following separate incidents involving suspected violent herders in Mangu Local Government Area of Plateau State.
Intelligence sources told Zagazola Makama that the first incident occurred at about 4:05 p.m. on Aug. 3 when troops deployed at Komtul responded to a distress call over an attack on a farmer, Kopdi Istifanus, at his farmland in Maraban Village, Pushit District.
The sources said the troops’ swift intervention forced the suspected herders to flee, while the injured farmer was rescued and evacuated to Miton Clinic, Pushit, for medical treatment.
In a related development at about 6:57 p.m. the same day, troops responded to another report of herders allegedly attacking farmers across the Bwor River in Mangu LGA.
On arrival, the troops reportedly sighted some herders chasing farmers away from their farmlands while armed with knives.
According to the sources, the situation became violent when the herders allegedly attempted to attack the troops with a knife during efforts to restore order.
The troops consequently fired two rounds of 7.62 x 39mm special ammunition to subdue the assailants, who abandoned the knife and fled the scene, leaving behind their livestock.
Security personnel recovered the knife and confiscated 27 cattle belonging to the fleeing herders for further necessary action.
Troops are maintaining dominance in the general area, while efforts are ongoing to apprehend the fleeing suspects and prevent further attacks on farming communities.
Troops Rescue Injured Farmer, Seize 27 Cattle After Violent Herders’ Attacks in Plateau
News
Five ISWAP Bomb Experts Killed in Premature IED Explosion in Borno
Five ISWAP Bomb Experts Killed in Premature IED Explosion in Borno
By Zagazola Makama
Five suspected Islamic State West Africa Province (ISWAP) terrorists, including an alleged medical officer and four improvised explosive device (IED) specialists, have reportedly been killed in a premature explosion while assembling explosives in Marte Local Government Area of Borno State.
Intelligence sources told Zagazola Makama that the incident occurred at Maina Daya Village, located between Sabon Tumbu and Jubilaram, about 29 kilometres east of Monguno.

According to the sources, the explosion killed Usman Dan Fulani, described as an ISWAP medical officer, alongside two foreign Arab IED technicians and two ISWAP bomb-making experts.
The sources said the incident occurred while the terrorists were allegedly preparing improvised explosive devices for deployment, suggesting the group was planning further attacks along key military supply routes in the Sector 1 area of Operation HADIN KAI.
Security analysts believe the loss of experienced bomb-makers is a significant setback to ISWAP’s IED network and could temporarily weaken the group’s capability to carry out roadside bomb attacks in the Marte-Monguno axis.
Military sources disclosed that troops have been directed to exploit the development by intensifying patrols, cordon-and-search operations, and precision offensive actions around Monguno, Marte, and Gamboru Ngala to prevent the terrorist group from regrouping or rebuilding its IED capability.
Five ISWAP Bomb Experts Killed in Premature IED Explosion in Borno
News
Lawyer Wants Police, Army, EFCC to Pay Victims of Wrongful Arrests, Hails DSS Accountability Policy
Lawyer Wants Police, Army, EFCC to Pay Victims of Wrongful Arrests, Hails DSS Accountability Policy
…Says Security Agencies Must Compensate Innocent Nigerians for Operational Errors
By: Michael Mike
A senior legal practitioner and human rights advocate, Hamza Dantani, has called for a sweeping reform of Nigeria’s security architecture, urging the Nigeria Police Force, the Nigerian Army, the Economic and Financial Crimes Commission (EFCC) and other law enforcement agencies to institutionalise compensation for innocent Nigerians wrongfully arrested, unlawfully detained or injured during security operations.
The call, which comes amid persistent concerns over arbitrary arrests and alleged abuses by security agencies, followed commendation for the Department of State Services (DSS) over what Dantani described as a groundbreaking policy of compensating victims of operational errors.
In a statement titled “DSS Compensation Initiative Sets Standard for Security Agencies,” the lawyer described the initiative introduced under the leadership of the Director-General of the DSS, Oluwatosin Ajayi, as a significant departure from the long-standing culture of impunity that has often characterised security operations in the country.
According to him, the policy demonstrates that security institutions can admit mistakes, provide redress to innocent victims and still retain public confidence and operational effectiveness.
“This is a bold, commendable and unprecedented gesture that deserves national recognition,” Dantani said.
“It demonstrates that while security agencies have a constitutional responsibility to protect the nation, they also have a moral and legal obligation to acknowledge mistakes and provide remedies to innocent citizens whose rights have been violated.”
The human rights advocate argued that while the fight against terrorism, banditry, kidnapping and organised crime remains one of the nation’s foremost priorities, security operations must always be guided by the Constitution and respect for fundamental human rights.
“The pursuit of security must never come at the expense of justice,” he said.
“National security and respect for fundamental human rights are complementary principles that strengthen one another.”
Dantani maintained that accountability should not be viewed as a sign of institutional weakness but rather as evidence of professionalism and commitment to justice.
He noted that by compensating victims of wrongful operations, the DSS had demonstrated that public institutions could accept responsibility for mistakes without compromising their mandate to safeguard national security.
To buttress his argument, Dantani cited several individuals who reportedly benefited from the compensation policy.
Among them is Kaduna-based farmer and herder Nura Idris, who allegedly received ₦3 million after being wrongly accused of links to Boko Haram.
He also referenced Abuja businesswoman Chineze Ozoadibe, who reportedly received ₦10 million after her wrongful arrest over allegations of oil bunkering.
The lawyer further mentioned a Sokoto trader who was mistakenly shot during a security operation in Jos in 2016 and was reportedly compensated with ₦20 million alongside lifetime medical care.
He also listed Umar Ibrahim, Alhaji Bello Rabiu and Jaja Sarki Bamo, who allegedly shared compensation after wrongful arrests over accusations of banditry and kidnapping, as well as 11 artisans from Osun State, who were reportedly compensated after being cleared of terrorism-related allegations.
According to Dantani, wrongful arrests often inflict devastating financial losses, emotional trauma and irreparable reputational damage on innocent citizens and their families.
Although financial compensation cannot erase such suffering, he argued, it represents an important acknowledgment that injustice occurred and that the government accepts responsibility for its actions.
He therefore urged the Nigeria Police Force, the Nigerian Army, the EFCC, the Nigeria Security and Civil Defence Corps (NSCDC), the National Drug Law Enforcement Agency (NDLEA) and other security institutions to establish transparent compensation mechanisms for innocent persons who become victims of operational mistakes.
The lawyer also proposed broader institutional reforms to reduce the incidence of wrongful arrests, including improved intelligence gathering, stronger identity verification systems, wider use of forensic investigations, enhanced inter-agency intelligence sharing, continuous human rights training for personnel and the establishment of independent complaint review panels.
He cautioned security agencies against using arrests as investigative tools rather than as actions based on credible evidence.
“An arrest should never be treated as punishment, and detention should never become a substitute for proper investigation,” he said.
He expressed optimism that the DSS initiative would inspire similar reforms across Nigeria’s security sector and promote a culture of transparency, accountability and respect for constitutional rights.
“The true measure of a justice system is not only its ability to punish offenders,” Dantani added, “but also its willingness to protect the innocent, admit mistakes and provide justice when those mistakes occur.”
Background
Wrongful arrests and prolonged detentions have remained recurring concerns in Nigeria’s criminal justice system, with courts frequently awarding damages against security agencies for violations of citizens’ fundamental rights.
Human rights organisations, including local and international advocacy groups, have repeatedly called for greater accountability within law enforcement institutions, arguing that arbitrary arrests and unlawful detentions undermine public confidence in the justice system and weaken cooperation between citizens and security agencies.
Under Chapter IV of the 1999 Constitution (as amended), Nigerians are guaranteed fundamental rights, including the right to personal liberty, dignity of the human person and fair hearing. These rights are further reinforced by the Administration of Criminal Justice Act (ACJA) and various judicial pronouncements requiring law enforcement agencies to operate within the confines of the law.
Analysts believe that if compensation mechanisms similar to the one praised by Dantani are institutionalised across Nigeria’s security agencies, they could significantly improve professionalism, strengthen public trust and encourage greater respect for the rule of law.
For many observers, the debate is no longer whether security agencies should be held accountable for operational mistakes, but how quickly reforms can be implemented to ensure that innocent Nigerians are protected while the country’s security forces continue the fight against terrorism, banditry, kidnapping and other violent crimes.
Lawyer Wants Police, Army, EFCC to Pay Victims of Wrongful Arrests, Hails DSS Accountability Policy
-
News2 years agoRoger Federer’s Shock as DNA Results Reveal Myla and Charlene Are Not His Biological Children
-
Opinions4 years agoTHE PLIGHT OF FARIDA
-
News1 year agoFAILED COUP IN BURKINA FASO: HOW TRAORÉ NARROWLY ESCAPED ASSASSINATION PLOT AMID FOREIGN INTERFERENCE CLAIMS
-
News2 years agoEYN: Rev. Billi, Distortion of History, and The Living Tamarind Tree
-
Opinions5 years agoPOLICE CHARGE ROOMS, A MINTING PRESS
-
ACADEMICS2 years agoA History of Biu” (2015) and The Lingering Bura-Pabir Question (1)
-
Columns2 years agoArmy University Biu: There is certain interest, but certainly not from Borno.
-
Politics1 year ago2027: Why Hon. Midala Balami Must Go, as Youths in Hawul and Asikira/Uba Federal Constituency Reject ₦500,000 as Sallah Gift
